Acl back on cwr again (1 Viewer)

Was a time stated?

Whats been said? Im at work so I cannot hear it

FL has agreed to host a meeting between ACL and sisu. Joy said no, sign the CVA and we will consider.

the football league agreed to get acl and sisu together for a meeting.....surprise surprise joy refused...hard faced bitch :jerkit::jerkit::jerkit::jerkit::jerkit:

Apparently football league wanted to broker a meeting with both sides. Sisu would only meet if the CVA is signed. ACL said that is a separate issue so no meeting.

covkid69 said:

the football league agreed to get acl and sisu together for a meeting.....surprise surprise joy refused...hard faced bitch :jerkit::jerkit::jerkit::jerkit::jerkit:

Click to expand...

Strange. Seemed to omit the CVA?

It says it all. Once again, Sisu are not 'fit and proper persons' to run a football club. Crooks.

Hopefully even the Football League will now start to get a picture of what's going on.

ACL will only commit to the meeting while the CVA is on the table unsigned.

Somebody just needs to bang their fucking heads together and get this sorted. Our first home game is in 3 weeks and there is absolutely no need for us to be playing our home games in a fucking tin shed in Northampton!

Grendel said:

Strange. Seemed to omit the CVA?

Click to expand...

So you don't see it as a refusal?

Would you have seen it as a refusal if ACL had said that their pre-condition was payment of all rent arrears?

So, it's all about the CVA. The lease.
They are both fighting hard for their cases ... it's nothing to do with 'care for the fans' but all to do with saving their businesses.
Ball is still in ACL's corner - nothing will happen before they sign or reject the CVA.

Godiva said:

ACL will only commit to the meeting while the CVA is on the table unsigned.

Click to expand...

That's not what he said at all.

Godiva said:

So, it's all about the CVA. The lease.
They are both fighting hard for their cases ... it's nothing to do with 'care for the fans' but all to do with saving their businesses.
Ball is still in ACL's corner - nothing will happen before they sign or reject the CVA.

Click to expand...

The "ball is in ACL's corner" only because that's the way that Joy wants to play it. There is nothing stopping her going to a meeting.

Grendel said:

Strange. Seemed to omit the CVA?

Click to expand...

If it was my business I wouldn't be signing that CVA.

They have to reject the CVA, if they accept it they no longer have a legal case to pursue and the battle for CCFC will be lost

Godiva said:

ACL will only commit to the meeting while the CVA is on the table unsigned.

Click to expand...

I thought that ACL had agreed to a meeting with no preconditions.

ACL asked FL if they would broker talks on Monday at their meeting. ACL placed no conditions on the talks
JS was contacted Tuesday, needed time to think
JS replied mid day Wednesday said no not unless ACL signed the CVA first
Offer remains on table but will be reviewed after ACL see what happens at the CVA meeting 22/07

In ACL's opinion the ability to hold talks and the CVA are not linked. Whatever happens with CVA the assets of the club are presently in CCFC H and they are operating the Club. If CCFC Ltd liquidated the club would still be there

ACL want CCFC at the Ricoh

Question - why is the signing of the CVA so important ?

Grendel said:

Strange. Seemed to omit the CVA?

Click to expand...

Would you sign ?
That would say that SISU can have everything for a fraction of what they are owed. Signing the CVA would be an agreement at the meeting as a precursor for coming back to the Ricoh. FL get some balls.

oldskyblue58 said:

ACL asked FL if they would broker talks on Monday at their meeting. ACL placed no conditions on the talks
JS was contacted Tuesday, needed time to think
JS replied mid day Wednesday said no not unless ACL signed the CVA first
Offer remains on table but will be reviewed after ACL see what happens at the CVA meeting 22/07

Click to expand...

You still doing some work for them OSB?

So is it correct that SISU want something in return for just having discussions.
Not sign the CVA and we will come back to the Ricoh.
They are saying sign the CVA and we will chat to you?
They can then just not get anywhere in the discussions?

I hope they don't sign it and take them to court !! fuck the money its time to take SISU all the way now its the only way to get the truth about whats been going on at the club the FL/FA need to grow some balls and back the fans on this as well !!!

Grendel said:

Strange. Seemed to omit the CVA?

Click to expand...

We will perhaps agree with a meeting once you have already given us exactly what we want, once the lease is broken and once you no longer have any leverage, maybe... So sign here please.

mark82 said:

You still doing some work for them OSB?

Click to expand...

Never have worked for ACL

I posted just what was said on the radio

Noggin said:

We will perhaps agree with a meeting once you have already given us exactly what we want, once the lease is broken and once you no longer have any leverage, maybe... So sign here please.

Click to expand...

Pretty much spot on.

Grendel said:

Apparently football league wanted to broker a meeting with both sides. Sisu would only meet if the CVA is signed. ACL said that is a separate issue so no meeting.

Click to expand...

What is your opinion on that?

ACL must not be sign this cva. Once it is that kills dead any investigation into how this debt occurred. PWKH has just said on CWR that Joy Seppella has said she won't okay any joint meeting with ACL and the football league whilst this cva is unsigned, ask yourselves why. Ainsworth is putting pressure on from the Parliament angle and there is pressure from Companies House, our MEP and our two other MPs. have edms in too. SISU will have reasons to kill off any investigation into their affairs and if that cva is signed do you trust Seppalla, Fisher and co will honour any meeting or implement any proposal put to them. As for our continuing transfer embargo, under certain circumstances the FL will allow players to join, they did so last season at Portsmouth a number of times.

dongonzalos said:

So is it correct that SISU want something in return for just having discussions.
Not sign the CVA and we will come back to the Ricoh.
They are saying sign the CVA and we will chat to you?
They can then just not get anywhere in the discussions?

Click to expand...

I think they want to make sure the lease is dead and burried and not playing any part in potential future talks.
Surely ACL expected that.

And SISU the opposite. Stalemate. We're fucked.

Godiva said:

ACL will only commit to the meeting while the CVA is on the table unsigned.

Click to expand...

oldskyblue58 said:

Question - why is the signing of the CVA so important ?

Click to expand...

to avoid Liquidation and investigation, we would have to look at the consequences on Holding if limitied was liquidated, would we receive a -15 deduction thats a risk. surely the non filing of account prior to all this mess would be looked at negatively by the court which would sure raise suspicion that more than poor business practice was involved?

All we can really do is guess

Originally Posted by Godiva

ACL will only commit to the meeting while the CVA is on the table unsigned.

Click to expand...

I didn't hear this?


My Question is will this give the FL enough leverage to withhold the golden share/ permission to play at the tinpot stadium

torchomatic said:

And SISU the opposite. Stalemate. We're fucked.

Click to expand...

It's not stalemate, it's avoidance.

ACL have agreed to a meeting with no pre-conditions.

Joy is avoiding having a meeting by demanding that the CVA be signed before she will consider attending. If it wasn't the CVA, I'm afraid there'd just be another excuse.

Godiva said:

I think they want to make sure the lease is dead and burried and not playing any part in potential future talks.
Surely ACL expected that.

Click to expand...

Do you think it is right to expect that before you sit round the table. Or should that be part of the negotiations.
Without it what is ACL's bargaining chip?

The battle to keep the Sky Blues in Coventry will reach the Minister for Sport today.

Coventry North East MP Bob Ainsworth will meet with Hugh Robertson MP and urge him to apply pressure on the Football League to respond to unanswered questions surrounding the ratification of the club’s move to Northampton for at least the next three years.

He is seeking answers around the location of player contract registrations and details of any plans to return to Coventry .

“I want the minister to raise these two issues with the Football League because he is currently looking at football governance in response to a select committee report,” said the MP.

“If the Football League will not provide proper structure, and stick to their own rules, then some action needs to be taken.”

Mr Ainsworth also put two further early day motions (EDM) before Parliament yesterday , raising questions about the company structure of Coventry City FC.

He questioned the role of company secretary Adam Bradley as well as asking the government to review the law in relation to company secretaries.

Previously in an EDM Mr Ainsworth questioned whether there had been “a conspiracy to defraud” over how assets had been moved at the club – a claim the club’s owners have denied.

In the latest document he states: “Mr Adam Bradley of Taylor Vinters was company secretary of CCFC Holdings Ltd, CCFC Ltd and other entities in the group from 20 December 2010 to 26 June 2013.



“However, that he says he never gave any advice during that period on insolvency or administration and indeed was surprised when Coventry City Football Club (CCFC) Ltd was put into administration and has had no discussions about this with any directors or other stakeholders nor attended a board meeting during his time as company secretary.”

According to the documents, Mr Bradley “did not have contact with key personnel at CCFC and in particular, never spoke to or took instructions from Joy Seppala, never spoke to Mark Labovitch, had limited dealings with Tim Fisher.”

Responding to the EDM, Mr Bradley said: “The role of a company secretary, for most UK private companies at least, is very much more limited than most people imagine.

“Parliament has provided that UK private companies are no longer required to have a company secretary. Mr Ainsworth does raise a legitimate question at the end of his motion as regards this statutory position, which is still held by many individuals in the UK.”

A second EDM called on accountants BDO to sign off CCFC’s overdue accounts.

Tim Fisher, Chief Executive of Coventry City FC said: “As we said just a few days ago, if Mr Ainsworth has concerns, and clearly he does, we would be happy to hear from him outside the confines of Parliament and to clear up the inaccuracies in what he says.”


Petition by iPetitions