1. You publish an article a few days after completely ignoring anything they have ever done wrong.
2. One of your board members uses multiple accounts to have a go at anybody who mentions the council, he makes things up to get away from it.
3. The person who wrote the article openly thinks there should be no pressure on the council or Wasps.
4. The article was checked over by an ex council leader.
How do we know they are pressured in any way, shape or form? Duggins doesn't seem to think so when he is bragging about Public Relations after making something up completely. Their PR company didn't think so when "Supporters Direct" were working with them.
Let's stop pissing about, people aren't thick and it's an insult to try and treat them as if they are. We aren't people who can be told "SISU are taking all the money" to get fired up.
Again, it's at the Trust in general rather than CJ the person!
This isn't happening and the aforementioned upcoming conformation of the facts will state that.
Considering you are doing it at a game that's on TV, do you not realise it is pointing fingers? Who exactly is it aimed at?
I'll be frank, the Trust are just looking like a PR company for hire. I will say now that any article they are involved with in the national media will say nothing that could be deemed as negative about any of the other parties.
It's no wonder Duggins can be so smug about it.
Maybe you are just being a bit naive?This is simply not true. It is possible to say in a demonstration "we've got a serious problem, there are multiple parties at fault but let's rise above that and concentrate on finding solution and showing the world what our club means to us and it's community". Please note it's obviously not going to be exactly that as it would be be a shit chant!
Fair enough they can;t talk about legal action. The question being asked now though is how are they going to keep the club in Coventry. Are they going to pressure London Wasps to agreeing a deal and if not what alternatives are they going to offer the club. There should be nothing stopping them answering these questions. If they refuse to answer then they should be targeted, if they was their hands they should be targeted and it needs to happen now.
How and where?This has happened and will continue to happen.
Maybe you are just being a bit naive?
How in any of that does it pressure ccc, sisu or wasps?
This has happened and will continue to happen.
It will certainly get people a bit fired up for a protest at the game won't it? Had best hope we win.Tbf it's not aimed at us. It's for the facebookers who will get all worked up about 'Tom' Fisher, frothing at the gash about anything and everything despite none of them having attended a game since Wembley.
How and where?
What did the trust say/ask of them? Do the questions have to remain confidential?
Why not?Meetings mainly. Same goes with the other parties. It's simply not always possible to broadcast what we've been doing.
Because of all parties the one who SISU would tell anything controversial that could affect any impending court case would be the Trust. I mean they've been such loyal SISU supporters ….Due to the legal action it probably will have too stay that way.
That's nonsense and you are hiding behind it.Due to the legal action it probably will have too stay that way.
Why not?
You are having secret meetings with one side but protests against others. David Johnson is letting slip a new club could play at the ricoh.
People really aren't stupid. The fact I and others have been one step ahead in predicting the meetings shows you that.
Like I said, people on here don't get fobbed off with a snippet. They add things up and all the trust keep doing is adding to it.
Does nobody understand why liquid gold suggested openness?
Does David have his meetings at SISU HQ 3pm Saturdays? Neither he or Joy attend games so it seems a perfect time.
It's nonsense. You can openly put a list to them.See previous posts. I can't say any more than that. I've just been advised I shouldn't.
Do you mean away games? David attended an away game with us, might have been Scunthorpe but could have been Wycombe and pretty much said he doesn't go to home games.Both of them do.
In fact what are you hoping to achieve? We'll look shitty to other fans as it's on tv and there will be many rightly saying why didn't they do this when things were going well, eg at Wembley. It will unsettle and create a hostile atmosphere, not to mention that it will be a splinter group not all out of not a huge following. They don't listen, they won't go and you're trying to antagonise them for no reason. They will sort the ground, I have faith it will still happen. This will go to the highest court before it finishes. The end game I am convinced will be soon after that. All parties are accountable in this mess, but it will be a demo only directed towards the owners. Support the team and enjoy doing so, that's our job as fans and let the other stuff take care of itself.
David doesn't go to home games. He told an interview why and it was made up.Do you mean away games? David attended an away game with us, might have been Scunthorpe but could have been Wycombe and pretty much said he doesn't go to home games.
There is one way that people can show they care about ccfc...We may look shittyif nothing is done on our only TV game. People will think we don't give a toss.
Or people who tune in to watch a L1 game at 12pm when they have United V Liverpool in the afternoon followed by Chelsea v Man City in the cup final, might actually not give a toss and want to watch the game rather than some overweight lunatics pretending to care, knowing their protest is futile and upsetting the team to boot. I doubt we'll get any sympathy or respect, so perhaps just back the team instead.We may look shittyif nothing is done on our only TV game. People will think we don't give a toss.
Is this the one where we all waved cards and then SISU sold up and left?Think back to Arsenal. That was the most effective form of protest we've had. As a fanbase I believe we need to show a united front and show what the club means to us. This is one way of doing it.
Was it? What did it achieve? That was at a packed Emirates.Think back to Arsenal. That was the most effective form of protest we've had. As a fanbase I believe we need to show a united front and show what the club means to us. This is one way of doing it.
There's loads of shit clapping at the Ricoh.The smell keeps most people away, particularly after his shit clapping.
Both of them do.
Can the Trust fund a simple survey of CCFC fans.
Q. Have you attend a Wasps game (Y/N)
Q. If yes, in the event that Wasps do not give CCFC a deal to remain at the Ricoh will you continue to attend any further Wasps games
We need a way to highlight to them the potential damage that they may cause not only ACL due to lack of revenues, but also Wasps due to fans that shun them as a result. Maybe the outcome of such survey would show negligible numbers, however it may help focus Wasps minds on the commercial impact of their decision. Money talks, bullshit walks and all that...
Specs
Would be a bit late then.If we are kicked out it should be full throttle on trying to get people to boycott Wasps games and for us all to protest.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?