He’s still our representative on the FSA
The wording of that clause is pretty odd isn’t it? Everyone has to raise exactly the same motion (which yes can be done) and then the board arrange a special meeting.
There’s nothing that requires them to put that date on a communication platform either from what I can see
He’s still our representative on the FSA
Can there be two Club Supporter Groups on the FSA?
Dont think so.
I would agree with this.Just a few points and these come from someone that signed up more people for the Trust than anyone else.
1. Why have the Trust not asked for additional subscriptions after the original £1.00 to join?
2. How many of the “membership” would pay even £1.00 now for continued membership?
3. How many meetings whether you agree with the formats or not of meetings have been held since the move to Birmingham?
4. Why do you think the Trust will not criticise CCC or Wasps?
Just a few questions I have more but enough to be getting on with. I have my answers which are
1 Because they would be embarrassed
with the number
2 probably not more than 100
3 Don’t think there has been 1
4 They think they can have some sort of influence I we go back to the Ricoh and SISU go.
The Trust can only be credible if they stick with the number originally claimed.
The Trust at one time did speak for me, unfortunately no longer.
Can there be two Club Supporter Groups on the FSA?
I do fear the club wont ever engage with the trust under these owners as the bridges have been burnedStill think we'd be better off moving the existing trust in the right direction. That may mean changes of board members as some are maybe too entrenched. Don't necessarily need a complete change to enforce a change of direction. Key things are opening up meetings and voting into something in keeping with 2020. Key to the trust should also be reopening lines of communication with the club.
We don't want to get into a Judean People's Front / People's Front of Judea situation.
Yeah, I know that. It's confusing how they let that happen. That aside, there should still be a vacancy on the trust board, I've not seen any replacement announced.
They said there were 6 vacancies & 6 valid nominations.
After it was repeatedly pointed out to them about the questionable characters of Ellis & Kalns neither is ultimately on the board (apparently).
Therefore there should be 2 vacancies still.
I do fear the club wont ever engage with the trust under these owners as the bridges have been burned
You only need to be a member of a Trust to represent that Trust, not a board member (though I suspect that's not the norm)He’s still our representative on the FSA
You only need to be a member of a Trust to represent that Trust, not a board member (though I suspect that's not the norm)
Neil or the Trust won't reply to my question about whether Mr Ellis is still a member of the Trust.
With his background, I certainly don't want him representing my club at the FSA.
It was more that they told us he'd resigned - Sky Blue Trust - The Sky Blue Trust Accept The Resignation of Secretary Roger EllisI'm sure he'll still be a member of the Trust, and I don't think he could have his membership removed.
I'm sure he'll still be a member of the Trust, and I don't think he could have his membership removed.
I think they would if different personnel were involved.
You only need to be a member of a Trust to represent that Trust, not a board member (though I suspect that's not the norm)
Neil or the Trust won't reply to my question about whether Mr Ellis is still a member of the Trust.
With his background, I certainly don't want him representing my club at the FSA.
Daft ape so that was an up to date article!!!!! Bloody hellNeil has stated that in the interviews given this week the interviewer only wanted to know about the atmosphere at St Andrews so it was not appropriate to mention the indemnity
Oh dear.Neil has stated that in the interviews given this week the interviewer only wanted to know about the atmosphere at St Andrews so it was not appropriate to mention the indemnity
The relevant bit would be what’s needed to be a Supporters Trust. That’s the bit I’m fairly sure you can only have one of. And only Trusts can be affiliates from my reading of thag.
There's already loads of them, to be fair.Why cannot you be a "Supporters Group" ?
Just asking
Why cannot you be a "Supporters Group" ?
Just asking
They aren’t treated the same. Saw something about five votes per affiliate and one per associate or something.
Christ, he really thinks he's a cut above and everyone else is an idiot. Absolute prickNeil has stated that in the interviews given this week the interviewer only wanted to know about the atmosphere at St Andrews so it was not appropriate to mention the indemnity
It was more that they told us he'd resigned - Sky Blue Trust - The Sky Blue Trust Accept The Resignation of Secretary Roger Ellis
Resigned from the board, not resigned membership. A lot of us are members, he's no different.
The relevant bit would be what’s needed to be a Supporters Trust. That’s the bit I’m fairly sure you can only have one of. And only Trusts can be affiliates from my reading of thag.
Are you really that dumb?
You really are just a vindictive little c**t.Are you really that dumb?
There's no evidence of him still being on the board. I'm not one for conspiracy theories.
Now, if you are asking if he still has influence, that's a different question. Its entirely possible he could have influence as one of what I assume is a handful of people who attend trust meetings.
You really are just a vindictive little c**t.
He never goes to meetings - he lives In Manchester
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?