covcity4life
Well-Known Member
yeah, ridiculous at that AT is shocked he went for more than cov kid wilson
Anderson CT interview (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter dynamoholbrooks
- Start date
yeah, ridiculous at that AT is shocked he went for more than cov kid wilson
torchomatic
Well-Known Member
Wilson had had one good season (and was injured for a quarter of it), Bournemouth took a risk. Rhodes has been doing it for a lot longer and with a less injury hit career.
Skyblueweeman
Well-Known Member
Rhodes has scored more goals in the top 4 divisions in the past 4 seasons than anyone else...more than Rooney, Aguero, Vardy, Wells etc etc...
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Nick
Administrator
What's his point about rhodes?
D
Deleted member 5849
Guest
He should say he wants to sign Messi, really test that statement to its limit.
The club have signed players, loans, old farts and even dragged some out of semi retirement. But if you look at selling your brightest young talent on the other scale, then i would suggest building foundations with the 7 signed, although true does not reflect the true story.
If some want to look at facts of 7 in 1 out then im not shocked he thinks he can fool the masses with his boloocks. These owners have no future or want a future they do not want promotion as they have no money to compete in levels above. I mean they are really close this year and instead of rejecting money and fighting to push they have took the money and painted a picture that they are thinking ahead. If they really wanted big things then Maddison would of been gone weeks before and 2 or 3 perm signings would of been brought in with next seson in mind. Or Maddison would of stayed and players would of been brought in. I dont expect some on here will agree with this but i dont care, Anderson is pissing on our backs and telling us its raining, like all those before him.
If some want to look at facts of 7 in 1 out then im not shocked he thinks he can fool the masses with his boloocks. These owners have no future or want a future they do not want promotion as they have no money to compete in levels above. I mean they are really close this year and instead of rejecting money and fighting to push they have took the money and painted a picture that they are thinking ahead. If they really wanted big things then Maddison would of been gone weeks before and 2 or 3 perm signings would of been brought in with next seson in mind. Or Maddison would of stayed and players would of been brought in. I dont expect some on here will agree with this but i dont care, Anderson is pissing on our backs and telling us its raining, like all those before him.
Last edited:
SlowerThanPlatt
Well-Known Member
Into the 'club' not the 'team'.
letsallsingtogether
Well-Known Member
What Made me laugh is his comment on clubs looking at the short term rather then long term.
How can we look at long term, when we keep selling anyone who is half decent and then just replace with loans that are only here for a season at most.
Then he goes on to say every penny of the transfer will go into the team, if we don't know what that figure is how do we know if that is true, they need to be honest for once.....
So was it £2M OR £9.5M
PUSB
How can we look at long term, when we keep selling anyone who is half decent and then just replace with loans that are only here for a season at most.
Then he goes on to say every penny of the transfer will go into the team, if we don't know what that figure is how do we know if that is true, they need to be honest for once.....
So was it £2M OR £9.5M
PUSB
letsallsingtogether
Well-Known Member
So true nothing has changed bar the spin doctors name.
thewards5579
New Member
Ian1779
Well-Known Member
Good to see that eagled-eyed you have managed not to be hoodwinked unlike poor old Tony Mowbray...
:facepalm:
dongonzalos
Well-Known Member
If the deal was to prepare us for the championship
If Liverpool Spurs and Norwich were all interested.
If we are currently self funding. For this season.
Do you think Maddison's value would increase or decrease by the summer.
For me based on his appearances this season I think increase. If the money is to set us up for the championship. I have say this doesn't add up.
Sell him in July for more money?
We needed that cash I hope over the next month we see why when we sign out attacking options as oppose to we were over budget and automatic promotion is suddenly a bit further way.
If Liverpool Spurs and Norwich were all interested.
If we are currently self funding. For this season.
Do you think Maddison's value would increase or decrease by the summer.
For me based on his appearances this season I think increase. If the money is to set us up for the championship. I have say this doesn't add up.
Sell him in July for more money?
We needed that cash I hope over the next month we see why when we sign out attacking options as oppose to we were over budget and automatic promotion is suddenly a bit further way.
Sick Boy
Super Moderator
The football league really do hate us!!!!! Nopm!!! Love the council hate cit...er sisu!!!
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
Just posting to mark the point you jumped the shark.
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
Did your parents have any children who grew up?
oldskyblue58
CCFC Finance Director
I think what is being said is probably reasonable as far as it goes but
- of course the money goes in to the club, its Otiums money for a player that company sold
- In to the club is not the same as all of it going on the playing squad.
- Our transfer fees are used to keep the club going because our turnover is not as big as it could be. That means not all the cash can be spent on players or players wages it has to be spent on other things. Turnover is limited by the inability to get some of the other stadium incomes (mainly naming rights) but also by an under performing commercial department in my opinion.
- If in League 1 then only 60% of the fee can be spent increasing the SCMP budget
- fact of life we have to sell to survive let alone build
all been said before by those other than Mr Anderson though hasn't it
http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/sp...ws/callum-wilson-cash-reinvested-back-7387302
- of course the money goes in to the club, its Otiums money for a player that company sold
- In to the club is not the same as all of it going on the playing squad.
- Our transfer fees are used to keep the club going because our turnover is not as big as it could be. That means not all the cash can be spent on players or players wages it has to be spent on other things. Turnover is limited by the inability to get some of the other stadium incomes (mainly naming rights) but also by an under performing commercial department in my opinion.
- If in League 1 then only 60% of the fee can be spent increasing the SCMP budget
- fact of life we have to sell to survive let alone build
all been said before by those other than Mr Anderson though hasn't it
http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/sp...ws/callum-wilson-cash-reinvested-back-7387302
rupert_bear
Well-Known Member
I think there's a lot of hogwash surrounding what Anderson said opposed to Mowbray. Anderson is hardly going to spill any beans to what Mowbray's plans may or may not be, I am certain if there is a player TM wants on loan, is available and we can afford he will get him as to having over the 5 allowed loan compliment some sit in the stands so what