Andy Turner - Load of Rubbish, it will never happen (3 Viewers)

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
I am not a Wasps fan but some of this Butts talk is in the realms of romantic fiction. To develop that site and not probably to our requirements; well the deal they wouldn't do for the Ricoh would have been cheaper.

But that deal isn't available now so there is no option but to look at alternatives.
 

Hobo

Well-Known Member
But that deal isn't available now so there is no option but to look at alternatives.
But you are looking for deals to match SISU's pocket, which are not that deep that is the reality. But it will suit their agenda to make the right noises.

I am not excited by this yet.
 

Sky Blue Harry H

Well-Known Member
I'd love to have a fast forward option on this saga and keep using it until this sorts itself out. Just want our own ground / or a better deal with the Ricoh - get promoted, then buy the Wasps out(and make the m play at The Butts as Coventry RFC B team).
 

martcov

Well-Known Member
I think the council have to be worried at the volatility of having Wasps as tenants of the city, they have moved their franchise once, chances are they will do it again before too long, if BPA is expanded they will then almost certainly have one empty 25,000+ stadium, which one it is depends on wether CCFC buy it from Wasps when they decide theyve had enough of Coventry.

Why? Do Wasps owe them any money?
 

martcov

Well-Known Member
But that deal isn't available now so there is no option but to look at alternatives.
Exactly. BPA short term emergency measure when the 2 years with Wasps are up, but no big investment. They may have a bit more capacity in 2 years, but never a new stadium. Keep looking for alternatives - your thinking on a Central Arena as part of the rejuvenation of the city centre would appeal to me. We no longer need so many retail units in town. The arcade, IceLand and that whole area should be ripped down and replaced with culture, sport and leisure. We have retail parks and Internet for shopping. Town should be for going out and/ or doing things - sport, theatre and other leisure activities. Watching CCFC as far as I'm concerned.
 

torchomatic

Well-Known Member

CCFC88

Well-Known Member
Why? Do Wasps owe them any money?

Not a risk in a financial sense, but if Wasps do up in and go in 10-15 years time and CCFC have built an alternative 25,000 stadium, there is going to be a huge empty stadium in the city doing nothing. Wouldn't look good on the council alloeing that to happen.
 

martcov

Well-Known Member
Not a risk in a financial sense, but if Wasps do up in and go in 10-15 years time and CCFC have built an alternative 25,000 stadium, there is going to be a huge empty stadium in the city doing nothing. Wouldn't look good on the council alloeing that to happen.
I suspect that will never happen, but an empty Ricoh would be an embarassment IF that ever happened.
 

torchomatic

Well-Known Member
I suspect that will never happen, but an empty Ricoh would be an embarassment IF that ever happened.
They'd just blame the club. Sorted.

Sent from my SM-N910F using Tapatalk
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
In 10 years time there May not be a SISU owned club to blame..

Never mind i am sure you'll get over it quickly and move on
 

Ashdown

Well-Known Member
It's Laughable that people { the same people} are giving this smoke screen any credence at all. Just go out and buy your season tickets quickly and I'd say very soon SISU will announce more court action against CCC and Wasps. This BPA bollocks is just a warning to Wasps not to kick us out as {'We could pull sticks again and piss off '} we have some other suckers ready to play our devious games with us.
1 SISU want somewhere to kick a ball around whilst litigation continues
2, CRFC are being drawn in by the promise of hitting the big time with increased revenue
3, CCC are being set up to be the bad guys by refusing permission somewhere down the line.
4 Wasps, actually are the only party trying to act with a level of professionalism [ And that being down to wanting CCFC fans footfall }
 

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
I don't think CCFC will revive till SISU are gone, why would anyone want to deal with them with the threat of constant litigation. They have dragged the club down.
 

torchomatic

Well-Known Member
It's Laughable that people { the same people} are giving this smoke screen any credence at all. Just go out and buy your season tickets quickly and I'd say very soon SISU will announce more court action against CCC and Wasps. This BPA bollocks is just a warning to Wasps not to kick us out as {'We could pull sticks again and piss off '} we have some other suckers ready to play our devious games with us.
1 SISU want somewhere to kick a ball around whilst litigation continues
2, CRFC are being drawn in by the promise of hitting the big time with increased revenue
3, CCC are being set up to be the bad guys by refusing permission somewhere down the line.
4 Wasps, actually are the only party trying to act with a level of professionalism [ And that being down to wanting CCFC fans footfall }

I've read some shit on here (and written a lot) but that is laughable.
 

torchomatic

Well-Known Member
Can you elaborate then Mastermind ? We'll see how it plays out then shall we mystic Meg !

Why? I'll just ask you as you know how it's going to work out, don't you?

CCC are the bad guys too. SISU don't wear black hats and CCC white. They're both bad guys, they have both fucked the club over, but you can't admit that, so you have to resort to some conspiratorial nonsense.
 

Ashdown

Well-Known Member
Can I please refer you to my post # 33 on 'Trust statement about the Butts'...............then feel free to apologise !
 

torchomatic

Well-Known Member
Oh, I see. So why does every other post you make angrily contradict that then, like the one in this thread?
 

Ashdown

Well-Known Member
They don't contradict anything. I've always maintained that the council have had their fingers in the pie and their sale to Wasps was disgusting. I just happen to think that the tactics by the hedge fund have been equally if not more disgusting, especially dragging the club away to Northampton. I had 3 kids going to the City with me, it was a family occasion and they broke that cycle. No way would I travel to Sixfields and in the meantime my girls slipped away and started doing other stuff, also other friends who used to go, gave it up and haven't come back, I'll never forgive SISU for that !
 

Senior Vick from Alicante

Well-Known Member
It's Laughable that people { the same people} are giving this smoke screen any credence at all. Just go out and buy your season tickets quickly and I'd say very soon SISU will announce more court action against CCC and Wasps. This BPA bollocks is just a warning to Wasps not to kick us out as {'We could pull sticks again and piss off '} we have some other suckers ready to play our devious games with us.
1 SISU want somewhere to kick a ball around whilst litigation continues
2, CRFC are being drawn in by the promise of hitting the big time with increased revenue
3, CCC are being set up to be the bad guys by refusing permission somewhere down the line.
4 Wasps, actually are the only party trying to act with a level of professionalism [ And that being down to wanting CCFC fans footfall }

Wasps will never be involved in direct litigation with Sisu. They would only be named as the beneficiary of what the council did when selling them the lease. That's for the future though as Sisu will be going all the way with the current JR, they wont lie down until its over. This is when I think the trouble starts, its when either Sisu goes JR2 about the wasps deal or gets out. That will mean either 5 more years of litigation or them extricating themselves in a way that makes business sense to them but not us.
 

Ashdown

Well-Known Member
I understand that, but just their name being dragged through the courts is going to piss them off I would think. You're right though whilst the club doesn't cost them any money to run they'll hang in and keep engaging lawyers to the bitter end. CCFC won't advance under that back drop either, it's a farce !
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
I am not a Wasps fan but some of this Butts talk is in the realms of romantic fiction. To develop that site and not probably to our requirements; well the deal they wouldn't do for the Ricoh would have been cheaper.
It is wish fulfilment I think. Sky blue tinted spectacle thinking.

It's all fine saying go to the Butts, but we need a stadium for our long term future and not just for 5-10 years. We need something to be our home for the next 50-100 years.

When we built the Ricoh the area was just wasteland and there was an enormous amount of space. With the Butts it is a really tight space and surrounding by new developments that will never get pulled down and access in and out would cause huge traffic problems.

Add to that the fact the Cov Rugby are very much talking down any concept of 25,000 and you can see the whole idea is awash with problems and the cost as a result, with all the limitations and ajustments and potential new road access is simply going to go up and up and up.

In an ideal world for me, Hearsall Common would be perfect. Stacks of space and lots of scope for new roads in and out. Again though, that is just fantasy talk because we all know the opposition would be huge and the land is common land.
 

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
I see that under Turner's article there is someone claiming that the best outcome would be for CCFC to be sold to the owners of Wasps. So, they want to sell to a hedge fund that actually moved a club 100 miles permanently. This logic is utterly insane and I am sure that there are more than a few who share this belief.
 

Nick

Administrator
I see that under Turner's article there is someone claiming that the best outcome would be for CCFC to be sold to the owners of Wasps. So, they want to sell to a hedge fund that actually moved a club 100 miles permanently. This logic is utterly insane and I am sure that there are more than a few who share this belief.

I'd ignore the comments section, some of them are insane. 1000's time worse than the worst on here.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
I see that under Turner's article there is someone claiming that the best outcome would be for CCFC to be sold to the owners of Wasps. So, they want to sell to a hedge fund that actually moved a club 100 miles permanently. This logic is utterly insane and I am sure that there are more than a few who share this belief.

There was someone the other day suggesting we merge with Cov United!
 

Covstu

Well-Known Member
I think clearly if we are looking at the Butts site it shows that we are limited in options, clearly there is no other site that can be used to build a stadium? Its clear that CCC don't want us to get this deal ahead and will block this at every avenue. Maton's usual shit at the bottom of this statement just wind me up further. Deals can be done - sorry damage has already been done here.
Both options show lack of ambition for our club but with dwindling crowds, I think a workable Butts groundshare would be preferable. Talk of getting a regular 25-30k attendance in the premier league is bullshit, we have never had that and never will apart from the grade A games.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
clearly there is no other site that can be used to build a stadium
Thats the problem. People say it would be too small but if the Ricoh isn't a viable option for us long term then what's the solution?

Plenty of people have said they wouldn't step foot over the city boundary and CCC have stated there is nowhere within the boundary for a new stadium.
 

Covstu

Well-Known Member
Thats the problem. People say it would be too small but if the Ricoh isn't a viable option for us long term then what's the solution?

Plenty of people have said they wouldn't step foot over the city boundary and CCC have stated there is nowhere within the boundary for a new stadium.
This is my point really, our options are limited. I think Wasps are happy for us to stay at the moment but the Butts option may not be around forever. If we cannot agree a future with Wasps (or choose not too) then we will be effectively homeless again.
 

jimmyhillsfanclub

Well-Known Member
The Ricoh is simply a no-go with the franchise wasps currently nesting there.
Lets push forward with the Butts redevelopment....15K capacity is good enough for the level we are currently at.
Get it built, hopefully CRFC & CCFC both thrive there & gain promotions & more fans....
...meanwhile, we can promote & continue a boycott of the wasps games & hope, along with their already stuttering attendances, that they fail, fold & fuck off....

......then CCFC buy the ricoh for a song....club & ground finally re-united.....& CRFC are left with a lovely 15k ground & rightly reinstated as the top rugby club in town.....


"you may say I'm a dreamer....but I'm not the only one"

Happy Friday folks.
 

Hobo

Well-Known Member
Thats the problem. People say it would be too small but if the Ricoh isn't a viable option for us long term then what's the solution?" Quote
If it was an existing 15000 stadium it would be a good short term option. But as it stands it will take a lot of investment to build something that is too small for the football club and too big for CRFC. It is worth exploring but I think people are getting too carried away with its viability.
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
I think clearly if we are looking at the Butts site it shows that we are limited in options, clearly there is no other site that can be used to build a stadium? Its clear that CCC don't want us to get this deal ahead and will block this at every avenue. Maton's usual shit at the bottom of this statement just wind me up further. Deals can be done - sorry damage has already been done here.
Both options show lack of ambition for our club but with dwindling crowds, I think a workable Butts groundshare would be preferable. Talk of getting a regular 25-30k attendance in the premier league is bullshit, we have never had that and never will apart from the grade A games.

No, we wouldn't get 25,000 - 30,000 every week, but we would get that against Man U, Man City, Arsenal, Spurs, Chelsea, Leicester. You only play 19 home games in the Premier League so there's a third of your home games right there and then we would also get big crowds if Villa came back up and Newcastle and then if Wolves and/or Birmingham came up too
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
The Ricoh is simply a no-go with the franchise wasps currently nesting there.
Lets push forward with the Butts redevelopment....15K capacity is good enough for the level we are currently at.
Get it built, hopefully CRFC & CCFC both thrive there & gain promotions & more fans....
...meanwhile, we can promote & continue a boycott of the wasps games & hope, along with their already stuttering attendances, that they fail, fold & fuck off....

......then CCFC buy the ricoh for a song....club & ground finally re-united.....& CRFC are left with a lovely 15k ground & rightly reinstated as the top rugby club in town.....


"you may say I'm a dreamer....but I'm not the only one"

Happy Friday folks.


Would be perfect. Exactly my thinking too, that we could make the Butts temporary and leave Cov Rugby with a lovely stadium while we get our filthy mitts back on the Ricoh.

We can dream anyway can't we.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top