We will work with whomever has the means, ability and desire to bring the club back home. I will do whatever it takes to solve this dispute which has done nothing but damage our city, a great football club and a great facility. There is little merit in spending time and energy looking backwards. We are where we are. Enough is enough.
Yet again littered with emotive crap - and people say Fisher plays to the crowd.
Seems this "pathetic" demo on the council steps wasn't in vain. Full marks to Stuart Cosgrove. Let's not stop now.
Yet again littered with emotive crap - and people say Fisher plays to the crowd.
It's just a restatement of previous statements.
Yet again littered with emotive crap - and people say Fisher plays to the crowd.
Maybe so. I'd take as an olive branch the what's done is done stuff though, wouldn't you?
Encouraging that she doesn't rule anything out either, slightly more depressing that we probably now have to wait a further month for action... so I suspect the 'home by Christmas' is a bit like WW1.
Agreed, the tone is right, but then I never had an issue with the council's tone under Lucas
Well I for one think that's a perfectly worded announcement from Ann Lucas.
<<The Council wants the Sky Blues playing great football successfully and sustainably at the Ricoh Arena.
I, personally, and my council colleagues will do all we can to make this happen. But, once again, nothing has changed in terms of our responsibilities to Coventry taxpayers. The sums need to add up - in terms of revenue and cost to play at the Ricoh Arena. The arena is owned 50% by the Council and 50% by the Higgs Charity - and we own it on behalf of the people of Coventry. I will not short change them. The Ricoh Arena is a great asset, and it deserves a great future. >>
Well done madam, I'd say the Ricoh is in safe hands. What constructive contribution will you offer Ms Seppala?
Yet again littered with emotive crap - and people say Fisher plays to the crowd.
Perhaps you could let us know what you consider to be 'emotive crap'?
I must not talk about the details of the long running and often bitter dispute that has led to my beloved Sky Blues playing its home games more than 30 miles away from the magnificent arena that was built for the club to play in less than a decade ago.
That's because the judicial review, brought by the club's owners SISU, means a legal dispute is still ongoing.
Whatever I, and my colleagues, think of Sisu, or Otium's behaviour or activities in the past, they are the current owners of the football club. At the present time only they can bring the Sky Blues back to the Ricoh, and I call on them to do so.
That doesn't mean talking to people who, I'm sure with the best of intentions, want to jump on a bandwagon and make claims about "sorting out" the football club and reuniting it with the Ricoh Arena. Let's keep this focused and serious - it's too important for frivolous gestures.
Our local media - radio and newspapers - has played a vital part in explaining the complexities of this saga and challenging those involved, and I know they will continue to do so.
There's your problem. We're back to the $64,000,000 question. How much is the Ricoh worth?
@ Canyouhearthedrums...Which part of....Anne Lucas's QUOTE "We will work with whomever has the means, ability and desire to bring the club back home. I will do whatever it takes to solve this dispute which has done nothing but damage our city, a great football club and a great facility. There is little merit in spending time and energy looking backwards. We are where we are. Enough is enough. Let's sort this out now, and bring the club home for Christmas."...............................................Can't you understand, or find "Emotive crap"???
Agreed, the tone is right, but then I never had an issue with the council's tone under Lucas
There's your problem. We're back to the $64,000,000 question. How much is the Ricoh worth?
Answer those questions to the voting public its nothing to do with SISU! what are the plans for the RICOH!! where does it say SISU?
Is there not already a council meeting scheduled to discuss the plans for the Ricoh and it's sustainability without CCFC?
As far as I am concerned she has an 800 signature petition asking valid questions of the council which is what she needs to act on not make statements that do nothing in providing answers to those questions being asked.
Answer those questions to the voting public its nothing to do with SISU! what are the plans for the RICOH!! where does it say SISU?
I didn't know that
When is it?
So your one example of the 'emotive crap' you say filled the statement is 'my beloved Sky Blues'....
Wonder why the phrase 'putting your brain in gear before posting drivel' comes to mind?
And as for highlighting phrases like 'brought by the club's owners SISU' I fail to comprehend why you consider this as 'partisan stuff' rather than a simple statement of fact.
Who are SISU acting as in bringing this case?
I would imagine they're acting as SISU. And your point is??
They're acting as the Football Club. After all it is the club who has allegedly suffered a detriment due to the actions of the Council.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?