Clearly goes both ways and I've been on the receiving end both ways.
Clearly but when a racist crime is committed on a white person it's not a story (for whatever reason)
So this was against a black person for sure was it?
I'm sure the people who claim to know the accused can tell us, but who's to say what race the prick was?
Doesn't matter. A racist is a racist.
Take for example. The fella in question called someone a yid. Does that make him a racist? When the Tottenham fans openly call themselves yids?
I'm not really able to answer that mate. It's not a 'phrase' I'd be banding about to be honest.
A good test would be to find 3 if the biggest Jewish blokes you can and say it to them. That's the best barometer for this sort of thing. If you think you'd end up with a broken nose, there's the answer.
/sarcasm but also serious
Didn't realise you we're a double hard machine. As you were.
True racism is when someone is discriminated against, ie not given a job, beaten up, treated differently by the state.
Calling someone a name should not be a criminal offense. How many "racists" have ever been arrested for mocking someone with ginger hair?
Name calling is just rude, nothing more, nothing less. If we start deciding what can & can't be said then we will become a police state. Society should state what is acceptable to say, not the law.
Not double. Treble hard bastard me. But back to the thread. let's see what was said first. Take the clattenberg incident last year. He was accused but not found guilty.
Wonder if the black society of lawyers will get involved. The biggest group of racists out there with BNP.
Clearly but when a racist crime is committed on a white person it's not a story (for whatever reason)
Again, 'Society of Black Lawyers' only in name. Anyone can techinically become a member or contributor. Where as initially the BNP was exclusive, and their leading member didn't think I (mixed race people) should exist. Slightly different.
As for Clattenburg, false accusations should be punished. Simple as that, it was bang out of order.
Anyway, I think I know your sort. So I'm out.
Not a non story for a white person this time.
Only in the name? So why call themselves black society of lawyers if its open to everyone?
As for my 'sort' because I don't agree with you I'm a 'sort' haha makes me laugh that. Because I have a different opinion to you. Priceless. Narrow minded at the highest degree
cus wyken has always been pro bnp IIRC
Not at all, 'sort' meaning having an agenda without any facts. Asking spurious questions that don't really have a set answer to try and swing things in your direction.
Steaming in with unfounded rubbish. As proven with your assumption about different opinions!
I don't care if you have different opinions to me.
As for the black lawyers question. feck knows. I read it on their site when it was in the news a few months ago.
Edit: Also 'sort' meaning Bertie big bollocks windmilling in before thinking
Problem is, it isn't just a problem in football, but it is still a genuine problem in society today. There are still antagonisms and negative stereotypes between ethnicities that need to be ousted, through proper, real education.
Look at the BNP, 500+k votes, UKIP (closet racists IMO) nearly 1m. The embarrassment of the EDL's existence, and their hypocrisy shames our society.
Yes, he has. We've had these threads before and he's always complained about "us poor whites" never getting a fair deal. I remember a sentence even starting "I'm not a racist but..."
Seems like the modern day fashion for intimidating anyone with an unfashionable opinion by putting a label on them is at work here
UKIP racist? Have a day off
Torch - get off the bandwagon, nothing to see here. Stick to stamping books you socialist, left-wing SISU, Andy Thorn loving know-it all.
Guilty as charged.
Charged with what? Having an opinion? and point me to where im wrong? All ears.
FFS! I was agreeing with you. I am a socialist, left-wing and did like Andy Thorn. Guilty as charged!
wasnt he also obssesed with hoolaganism?
You utter fool. How are UKIP racists? Because they believe immigration is too high? I'd say ALOT of people would agree, that's not racist it's a fact that we fork out billions to immigrants on a yearly basis. Far too much.
As for Saturday, be interesting to hear what was said. A whole stand of Tottenham fans singing yid army was ok. A coventry fan calling someone a yid gets nicked.
Two sides to everystory before people jump on the bandwagon. Innocent till proven guilty eh.
All i can say in response to this, if you call me an english c*nt, I won't be bothered and will probably laugh. But black c*nt? You are in for trouble.
It is different and trying to suggest otherwise is wrong.
As for all the other chants? I don't sing any of them as I have respect for people.
Add to that of the 5 mates I go up with, one is Welsh, one is half french and one is Irish.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?