I agree to an extent...though I wonder how many of these poor members of society have old fashioned &/or low spec modern TV's - how many of them have satellite/cable TV too?I particularly admire the BBC for the way they punish the least well off in our society, I take must enjoyed from the fact that they use threatening mail campaigns and "bailiffs" to lie and harass them. They do I good job of talking these people to court (1 in 10 of every court case in the UK is TV licence related) and getting them fined.....Bravo!
You can buy a decent TV for the cost of the licence these days, perhaps some people just have to make a choice. I wouldn't begrudge anyone getting a little enjoyment from owning a half decent TV, perhaps the less fortunate in our society should only be allowed to watch black and white portables, or stand in the street staring through windows at other peoples TV's.I agree to an extent...though I wonder how many of these poor members of society have old fashioned &/or low spec modern TV's - how many of them have satellite/cable TV too?
No idea myself but wherever I go I see loads of satellite dishes in less affluent areas.
...onwards & upwards PUSB
What on earth does the guys native tongue have to do with it?
From a shock level...people want to know about it if it's local
...onwards & upwards PUSB
Nor do I begrudge them a TV for a little pleasure. It's all about accepting responsibility to live within the mainstream accepted rules. Anyone buying a TV to watch knows full-well that they need to buy a licence, full-well that there are detector vans about & full-well they risk being fined by not having one.You can buy a decent TV for the cost of the licence these days, perhaps some people just have to make a choice. I wouldn't begrudge anyone getting a little enjoyment from owning a half decent TV, perhaps the less fortunate in our society should only be allowed to watch black and white portables, or stand in the street staring through windows at other peoples TV's.
Your view of what constitutes aggression is clearly as warped as your view on Muslims.Why such an aggressive response?
The left says terrorism has no religion. Although it looks seemingly that a lot more terrorism/barbaric attacks are commited in the west by muslims for their religion than say buddists, sikhs, or hindus. It's open to debate, but I think any realist would look at that above statment and agree with it.
A muslim guy hacks off the faces of two people in broad daylight and the left leaning msm don't report it. Had the background or tongue of the perpetrator been different, would it have been reported?
Academic analysis backs up your observations.Reported as a Terror attack or...?
I'm not saying the BBC don't report anything, I'm just saying they seem to wait until after everyone else reports it is terror, just to clarify. EDIT: or that's just the impression I get
Plus, I trust the BBC more as a source than the Daily Mail etc.
Your view of what constitutes aggression is clearly as warped as your view on Muslims.
As I pointed out in another post just because horrific offences are committed by someone of religious persuasion makes them no more newsworthy as horrific offences by non-religious people.
I can assure you that the vitims care not for the background or reasons they are are targeted by the maniac that attacks them.
As I said in another post...gun-toting Americans commit a massive number of offences in the west (including murders), that constitute terror for the victim. The difference in the level of horror of the attack is mostly felt by those left behind.
You're still more likely to be maimed in the street by a bad/drunk/drugged driver than by a Muslim.
...onwards & upwards PUSB
"Although it looks seemingly that a lot more terrorism/barbaric attacks are commited in the west by muslims for their religion than say buddists, sikhs, or hindus. It's open to debate, but I think any realist would look at that above statment and agree with it."What is my warped view of Muslims?
You clearly did get upset by my post because your response was very jumpy. I don't know why.
I'm not saying in the US that Americans don't commit more gun crime than anyone else, I'm just saying that when it comes to barbaric attacks/attempted attacks/terrorism offences that muslims are overrepresentated in the population for these crimes. That's not tarring everyone with the same brush either before you jump on that one...
Of course if a relative of mine got hit by a drunk driver, or got sliced up by a mad jihadi, my feelings towards the perpetrator would be equally unforgiving.
"Although it looks seemingly that a lot more terrorism/barbaric attacks are commited in the west by muslims for their religion than say buddists, sikhs, or hindus. It's open to debate, but I think any realist would look at that above statment and agree with it."
That seems to me to fall prey to media agenda. There may be a great many other religiously motivated attacks that just simply don't gain the same coverage.
I used the word 'warped' as there was absolutely no aggression in my responses. In fact I might be entirely accurate in saying much fewer than 0.5% of my responses have aggression attached.
...onwards & upwards PUSB
Well you can say what you like - to me you might have a warped view of 'normal' as well. Especially if everyone that disagrees with your thoughts you try to belittle with some hinted snide suggestion they are Express or Mail readers...which are tabloids...which still massively outsell the broadsheets.That statement I made (which you have quoted) was not warped in the slightest. It's a pretty common view with a lot of people feeling the same.
The media almost doesn't come into it unless you preach the mail/express, which most normal people don't.
Well you can say what you like - to me you might have a warped view of 'normal' as well. Especially if everyone that disagrees with your thoughts you try to belittle with some hinted snide suggestion they are Express or Mail readers...which are tabloids...which still massively outsell the broadsheets.
...onwards & upwards PUSB
I'm not belittling anything you said, I just disagree with a lot of it. I also believe a lot of people are worried about terrorism, particularly from radicial muslims, and I don't see how that is warped or beyond normal either.
You've completely condradicted that.
How can I supposedly have warped views of muslims, then class the righty newspapers as something different to my views and belittle them in response to arguing with you? What you said literally made no sense.
My quite balanced views in criticism for both sides gets shouted down a lot on here. Mostly by the left, it must be said.
I'm not belittling anything you said, I just disagree with a lot of it. I also believe a lot of people are worried about terrorism, particularly from radicial muslims, and I don't see how that is warped or beyond normal either.
Can't include me in that. I am opposed to such interference as it is largely aimed at grabbing more wealth for the chosen few rather than the greater good.Very true, but they're not so worried as to object to their own government interfering in the internal affairs of muslim countries and very often creating the terrorists of which they are now so afraid.
I'll be there in three weeks. Want to see the Musee D'Orsay, eat some ace cheese and not be killed
I'll be there in three weeks. Want to see the Musee D'Orsay, eat some ace cheese and not be killed
Terrorist attack confirmed
Agreed. Despite what some sections of the media like to peddle, the majority of British Muslims are integrated within British society.
there are certainly issues about intergreation, this has been like this for years. not something sikhs or hindus get accused of too much i notice though.
thing is intergrated or not i still dont see the majority of bradford or oldham hatching terrorist plans. it will still be a tiny minority. also lets not pretend the non asians in oldham and bradford are nice as pie and just wanna get along lol. unfortunetly thats something that needs to be fixed now but we wouldnt see results for a decade or so with kids growing up together and realising each other are not evil.
If you have money, you can afford to buy things, if you don't, you can't. It's always been that way.You can buy a decent TV for the cost of the licence these days, perhaps some people just have to make a choice. I wouldn't begrudge anyone getting a little enjoyment from owning a half decent TV, perhaps the less fortunate in our society should only be allowed to watch black and white portables, or stand in the street staring through windows at other peoples TV's.
I'll be there in three weeks. Want to see the Musee D'Orsay, eat some ace cheese and not be killed
Wonder if he's trying to affect the share price of anybody.Apparent;y a bloke arrested in London today with loads of knives
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?