Any ideas if we can appeal it?? Defiantly wasn't a foul let alone a red card!!! Shocking officials as usual
Exactly, mate it was never a foul in a million years, its clearly shoulder to shoulder and the Rotherham player throws himself on the floor... should have been booked for divingI thought they changed the rules a couple of seasons ago, where if they gave a penalty, you no longer automatically receive a red card for a last man challenge?
Exactly, mate it was never a foul in a million years, its clearly shoulder to shoulder and the Rotherham player throws himself on the floor... should have been booked for diving
4th goal completely summed the game up!Tbh, it was just a stinker of a performance all round. I wasn't surprised that two penalties and a red card given against us.
We need him back alongside rose for Sunday though... thats the partnership that was working bestI wouldn't appeal as it'd be forcing someone to watch our defending which seems cruel, ideally all footage of Saturday would be incinerated.
Hyam is the best centre back at the club mate he is ahead of McFadz for meWe need him back alongside rose for Sunday though... thats the partnership that was working best
Hyam is excellent but the partnership of Rose and Mcfadz was working the bestHyam is the best centre back at the club mate he is ahead of McFadz for me
Harsh, he's been our best defender up until Saturday.... Hyam had a shocker too giving them the 4th goalHopefully he don’t win the appeal we don’t need anymore of that crap next game
It was literally shoulder to shoulder which i thought was allowed in football! He didn't push into him or trip him up!! One of the worst decisions I've seenIt was a foul, it was a deliberate attempt to stop the player. Pointless appealing.
Robins said on the radio after that we can't appeal
Because if we win, we'll have to play him on the tele where the whole country will see!Why?
If the ref said it was a professional foul to stop a goal-scoring opportunity then it's just a one game banIf it's a one game ban then probably not worth appealing it.
Could still be a one game banOnly seen once on tv and looked like he deliberately tripped him so that would make it a red as not trying to play ball.
Agree he looked better with Rose but he’s been making mistakes most games his passing is woeful at times he give them 2 goals Saturday 1 against Pompey it’s not good enough mate Hyam & Rose I hope will become our pairing.Harsh, he's been our best defender up until Saturday.... Hyam had a shocker too giving them the 4th goal
he only said that because he thought it was 2 yellows . he didnt realise it was a straight redRobins said on the radio after that we can't appeal
You might want to read the rulesIt was a foul and he was last man. It wad a red card.
Move on.
Sent from my G8441 using Tapatalk
You might want to read the rules
That could be a positive......Trouble is if we appeal and it’s rejected don’t they increase the ban by a game.
Yeah but that's not what was said was it. It isn't simply last man + foul = red anymore.He’s right though. As McFadz didn’t attempt to play the ball it had to be a red. The ‘double jeopardy’ ruling only applies if it is felt the foul is a result of a genuine attempt to play the ball.
He pushed him clearly with his left arm, it was no where near shoulder to shoulder. It was a clear pen and sending off.It was literally shoulder to shoulder which i thought was allowed in football! He didn't push into him or trip him up!! One of the worst decisions I've seen
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?