Actually the shares are worth the same as when they bought in - £NIL
Conventional football investment wisdom is that any money put in is put in as a loan - thats what SISU did ........... and that from the details of the first bid is what the GH Consortium is planning on doing too. So at a very basic level what is the difference ? The strategy/understanding/hopes are different but the mechanics of it are exactly the same ...... are exactly the same at nearly every club.
I dont think SISU fully understood what they were getting into - most importantly from the PR & fan connection side - but at some point someone had to say enough we cant continue like this and that was going to hurt on and off the pitch. YET we are pretty much asking GH to deal with the finances in much the same basic way (put money in by loans keep costs down etc) - albeit with the sweeteners of apparent investment in the squad, better PR & fan connection and because he is a fan.
Sorry, but you dont manage hundreds of millions without a great deal of business sense - they got some important things wrong at CCFC, lost the faith of 99% of the fans, made their remaining almost impossible - but they didnt get everything wrong.
As for Pompey I every sympathy with the fans to a point - to a point because while the club was succeeding yet being driven into the ground by ridiculous unaffordable wages there were very few saying a crash was coming, they were caught up in the apparent success. The club lived way beyond its means - gained a brief spark of success at great cost. What is most important ? ........... a season of winning something or the survival of the club ?