shmmeee
Well-Known Member
Didn't he spend it on shit loanees?
Weren't Pressley supposed to get some of Wilson's fee too?
I got the impression 60% was agreed, but that's just from here so could be totally wrong.
Let's say we get £5m, 60% of that is £3m. an average of £1m each on say a GK, CB and ST would work wonders for us. And unlike our last few managers, I'd trust him with the cash.
Let's say we get £5m, 60% of that is £3m. an average of £1m each on say a GK, CB and ST would work wonders for us. And unlike our last few managers, I'd trust him with the cash.
Must say I disagree. This season is all about trying to win promotion and if we can sell him and strengthen in maybe THREE positions I would take that all day long.
You also have to remember, the word is that he would be loaned back anyway.
Wembly 1987 was pretty special CD
Doubt we would be able to afford the championship wages of 3 off £1M pound players.
Your talking wages of 200 to 250k for per million pound rated player. Have to put aside close 750k just for wages. When at the moment only paying Maddison about 100k if that.
http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/sport/football/football-news/tony-mowbray-given-extra-cash-10765135IF TM is given funds of course.
Mates just txt me who is a spurs fan. he reckons on there website it says there talking to him at the minute with a view to signing and loaning him back for rest of season. Havnt checked there website so not sure..
Can not believe in reading some people prepared to sell him!? If you can not see the genuine quality that lad has got then you don't know football. If we let him go for anything under £10m he is undersold
Exactly! This is how football works and how clubs survive. Outside of the very top clubs in this country, every club is a selling club.It isn't anyone on here being prepared to sell him. It is people on here being realistic. And it would be a good move for all involved if it is for a large amount and TM is given the funds to secure promotion this season and then to get a side together that can compete in the championship.
Because he is allowed a little leeway with loans and frees does not mean he'll be seeing any of the Maddison cash.
TM said previously that he wouldn't sell anyone unless it was an offer he couldn't refuse. It took a lot of negotiating before he signed his contract. It is said that he gets 60% of all income to spend as he likes. He got the training ground done up. He got the team bus repainted. And now it has come out that he has more money to spend now that attendances are up.
1, Everything points towards TM having the final say in who comes and goes. So why would he sell Maddison if he never got any of the money to strengthen the squad?
2, Do you really think that Joy is stupid enough to go against the contract signed with TM and risk him walking away? He is her only chance of getting back the money previously wasted.
I don't mind anyone having a go at any of the sides that have had a hand in putting us where we are now. But SISU seem to be doing the right thing now. And I stupidly trust them to continue to let TM have the last say in everything.
My how things have changed. Just to clarify; you think that Joy has entered into a contract with TM about what funds she will or won't supply?
You trust them? Ah bless.
And as usual you only use the part of what I say that gives you a chance of having a dig and miss out the other half of the sentence.
So why did it take so long for TM to sign a new contract? And why has TM been given more funds now our attendances are up?
Don't get me wrong... I am thrilled that attendances are up and that our owners have responded by loosening the purse strings. But let's be clear... no manager, ever, ever has full charge of transfers/budgets. (unless he is also the owner) And the fact that you now 'trust' a hedge fund on the strength of half a season is pitiful.
Pitiful?
Ok. Try and call me wrong without taking what I say out of context for once.
Has TM been given 60% of all income to spend how he likes? We really don't know
Is he the only chance that we know of for Joy to get back the money wasted previously? Probably
Has TM done with the smallest budget what the previous managers have failed to do? Yes
Has anyone from SISU poked their nose into what TM has been doing? I've no idea and neither do you
Has TM had a full say in where the money has gone including painting the team bus? Over the modest buget he was given, yes
In fact for once come out with your reasons for saying I am wrong and my views are pitiful and tell us all why I am wrong. All you are doing is putting a view across without any reasoning behind it. Do you not like the fact that I don't have a go at any of the sides all of the time?
Clearly Ms Suppella finally sees a way out of this mess and has backed it.
I think you are a nice fella but very naive if you think that TM has full control and the leopard (hedge fund) has changed it's spots.
As I have said a couple of times already what evidence have you to show that TM doesn't have full say on the 60% of income budget? Or was it Joy's idea to do up the training ground after years of neglect and her idea to repaint the team bus as she doesn't like orange?
And why has his budget gone up with our attendances?
The best thing you have been able to come out with is your hedge fund comments. And before TM I would have agreed.
And as usual you only use the part of what I say that gives you a chance of having a dig and miss out the other half of the sentence.
So why did it take so long for TM to sign a new contract? And why has TM been given more funds now our attendances are up?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?