Jesus that caused a stir. That statement genuinely wasn't meant to be offensive. I'm allowed an opinion on the trust and it is of my opinion that I think they believe they are "elite" in comparison to the average sky blue fan. All this jibber jabber about this meeting yesterday makes me cringe. I don't think they give a shit what the average Cov fan thinks, they have meetings, discuss politics, what THEY want, then release a statement. All seems a little show business to me. I'm not knocking what they do, each to their own and all that. Just MY opinion. Cue the outrage.
I'm allowed an opinion on the trust and it is of my opinion that I think they believe they are "elite" in comparison to the average sky blue fan. All this jibber jabber about this meeting yesterday makes me cringe. I don't think they give a shit what the average Cov fan thinks, they have meetings, discuss politics, what THEY want, then release a statement.
Perryccfc
Yes your allowed to have an opinion, but you should get the facts first before you make such statements.
People like you have no idea, they just knock others for the sake of being different. You know nothing?
I'm stating an opinion and by challenging my opinion you are just reaffirming it.
So, if you say that in your opinion the sea is made of custard and I reply that I think you're wrong - that reaffirms your opinion that it is in fact made of custard?
So what is Mr Haskell's "sound and realistic plan"?
So, if you say that in your opinion the sea is made of custard and I reply that I think you're wrong - that reaffirms your opinion that it is in fact made of custard?
I'm always happy to get feedback eg comments on here after i was interviewed by SL after walsall game made me appreciate i didnt handle finance question very well. So if could say something more specific about why it would make you cringe that would be helpful.No offence, but I cringe at the image of PH4 meeting you people.
I think perry was just remarking on how cringy the SBT were on late kick off.
Two rules in here perry:
Firstly the trust are beyond reproach.
Secondly the stadium should never be in private hands, power to the people comrade and all that.
Two rules in here perry:
Firstly the trust are beyond reproach.
Secondly the stadium should never be in private hands, power to the people comrade and all that.
Whats the obsession with stadium ownership?
As long as the club receives income streams I wouldn't care if it was owned by John Mutton's Auntie Ethal.
i love rule 1 - just a shame it isn't true cos i've had more abuse on here than in my entire life!
Dont think i understand rule 2??
He means that the council will refuse anyone the ability to own the ground or gain maximum revenue from it - a view that worryingly many of our fans support.[/
QUOTE]
Cheers, Grendel. I may be entirely wrong but seems there will be a few sideshows but main feature remains the Administrator's report to creditors which isn't till next month. It's gonna be a long wait...
What an absolutely pathetic comparison!
Grovel. Give it a rest - the issue is no one besides a few apologists want Sisu to own the ground....
GMK has more info from AshbyJan on the 'meeting'
http://www.gmkonline.com/?page=forum&forum_id=6&thread_id=32556
My apologies - I was trying to pitch something at the intellectual level displayed in your posts
So through my posts I show a lack of intelligence?! Not a good judge of character my friend!
He means that the council will refuse anyone the ability to own the ground or gain maximum revenue from it - a view that worryingly many of our fans support.
From pretty much all of your posts you don't care who owns it as long as the football club don't.
When they said something you disagreed with?
No I agreed with most points
Just don't think they represent all Cov fans
U can be sure that if 100 pro sisu members joined them not 1 of them would be chosen by Jan for TV spots etc.
The Trust is a 100% democratic organisation. Any member can put forward a proposal and then people vote on it. Jan is one of 12 Board Members (10 elected, 2 co-opted to fill skills gaps) - the idea he decides who does what will certainly be giving several people a good laughNo I agreed with most points
I think these should now become stickys because I've posted these points so many times....
Just don't think they represent all Cov fans The Trust doesn't represent all fans - it represents the views of it members
U can be sure that if 100 pro sisu members joined them not 1 of them would be chosen by Jan for TV spots etc.
The Trust is a 100% democratic organisation. Any member can put forward a proposal and then people vote on it. Jan is one of 12 Board Members (10 elected, 2 co-opted to fill skills gaps) - the idea he decides who does what will certainly be giving several people a good laugh
No I agreed with most points
Just don't think they represent all Cov fans
U can be sure that if 100 pro sisu members joined them not 1 of them would be chosen by Jan for TV spots etc.
Will the board members bare knuckle fight for the seat on the ccfc board?
and will they be a true representive of what we supporters want.
can we vote for who we want on the board from the trust
Confirmed, I for one do not believe I am the right person to sit on any board and report back to members.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?