Good point but we can only go with the answers we're given. I suppose if two court cases, an administrator, the football league and ACL can't find the golden share we were struggling to get some clarity from the offset
Goodnight all probably have a nightmare now about my club being relegated from prem then championship then administration loss of pointsetc but its alright i'll wake up in the morning and l'll realise it was only a bad dream
Lets not jump the gun. I think it was the day the administrator was appointed, he may have been told or shown it and just said no as it would be something else he may have to deal with.
J
Jack Griffin
Guest
Personally I don't give a monkey's proverbial what they said, its worthless, what matters now is what the administrator reports & what the judge decides.
Besides I expect their answers to be fully up to the hight standard of veracity that TF usually sets. :jerkit:
Besides I expect their answers to be fully up to the hight standard of veracity that TF usually sets. :jerkit:
No, it was last Monday or Tuesday I think. SISU said they were talking to their lawyers about the impending court case and they advised them to tell us not to print due to the court case.
As Jack said it's all a bit academic now anyway, but if Sisu withdrew their consent to the answers being published then I think it was sensible of the trust not to print them. The trust need to maintain some kind of relationship with Sisu while they are involved with the CCFC. In my opinion withdrawing consent just ended up being bad PR for Sisu - I think their capacity for self-inflicted harm is quite stunning.
The whole idea was to get the responses of both parties out on the website without comment from the Trust. So fans could read the responses and make their own minds up so it went somewhat pear shaped when SISU pulled the plug because it may have come across as one sided. But ultimately we decided to publish because (at that time) they were the only responses we had. I'm hopeful that we can get SISU's responses out very soon because that was our aim in the first place.
Withdrawing consent is probably a little harsh on them, if their lawyers regarded some of their answers as sub judice then it was the right call (for them) but you're right that it makes them look bad.
