I'mARealWizard
New Member
Result!
Harbouring a suspected rapist.
Top result.
I guess because he's not accused of rape.
He's accused of 'consensual unprotected sex'. Which is a crime in Sweden. That's quite different to rape. I highlighted the relevant part to aid your understanding.
And the authorities found no case against him during their original investigation.
But for some magical reason, the case was mysteriously opened at a much later date with a different conclusion drawn.
I wonder why... :thinking about:
Really? I thought that is exactly what we were doing. And so far, I have yet to even call you a c**t.
So because it doesn't "feel right" you class that as a "result" that someone is yet to face the serious charges a Supreme Court has judged there is a case to answer to?
Is that the point you are making?
What was your point of this thread?
You have swerved every single point I have raised on this thread. Why?
I'll tell you why because you started it without really thinking it through properly and were just jumping on the "ooh yeah it's cool to support Julian against those nasty Americans" brigade.
Try growing a backbone and having a little bit more conviction in your views rather than just following like a sheep because it's the cool "lefty" thing to do.
Why start a topical thread and then when someone has the audacity to disagree with your viewpoint and prove that you may be wrong do you then suddenly squirm and refuse to enter into debate?
Was it the bit where you found out the charges against him weren't 'consensual unprotected sex'? You know the bit that you so kindly highlighted to aid my understanding?
Don't believe everything you read on Searchlight.
My good god.
Taking liberties, storm the place, crack some heads.....
It's been said I m a little old school
So if someone was taking refuge in a British embassy abroad you would be okay with that country doing the same?
So if someone was taking refuge in a British embassy abroad you would be okay with that country doing the same?
Of more importance is why do American civil laws apply to non-American's, living outside of America?
If I carry a handgun down the high street, can I then champion American liberties and request extradition?
Also I think if Assange is guilty of these charges why wont Sweden offer guarantees over the extradition, or at least meet him in the embassy?
Tell you what here is a quiz question for you. Which of these 3 counties has the worst human rights record:
Big bad America
Sweden
Equador
Go figure.
Correct me if I am wrong on this point, but I'm not aware of Sweden or Equador engaging in an illegal war in Iraq and invading Afghanistan because someone was allowed to fly into their buildings.
There are 6 articles of Human Rights Law that are considered the worst. Torture, slavery, liberty, freedom of movement, political freedom etc.
Most South American countries (including Equador) fail on atricles 19,13 and especially Article 3 Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person. The USA does not.
So the death penalty in US States ensures the right to life just how exactly?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?