LeamingtonBootBoy
New Member
Interesting to hear AT (and some fans, although much less in number these days) still claim after the Pompey game that we are playing '...great football...'.
Sorry, AT, but passing the ball across your back 4, and then to Clingan to play triangles with the back 4, with the occasional cross from a full back does not constitute 'great football'.
If the football was 'great', then we'd be opening teams up and scoring goals...and we are clearly not doing that.
I'm sorry, but I just don't see where this 'great football' is...yes, AT tries to get the players to PASS the ball...but this is not the definition of 'great football', Andy....
Joke defending, a keeper who is a dodgy catcher of a ball, a midfield who do not beat their man nor get in many crosses, and only one player in the team to have scored more than 2 goals also leads me to believe that we are not playing '...great football..'.
And if AT is hell bent on this appraisal of the team he manages, a record of 2 wins in 21 would suggest that the football is not '...great...'.
The conclusion to all of this....I have always said we need to give AT half a season...well, even if he wins the next 3 games, we'll only have 22 points from 23 games and that's relegation numbers.
Sorry, AT, nice guy and all that, but we MUST AVOID RELEGATION AT ALL COSTS, and if that means trying someone else to get more from these players then so be it...we could do with the impetus from a new manager (just like AT had in March/April)...we need to try and achieve what Burnley/Millwall/Bristol C have done and strive for a couple/three wins...that's all that's needed to get back in touch with the pack...if those shitty teams can do it, so can we with the players we have...surely??????
Sorry, AT, but passing the ball across your back 4, and then to Clingan to play triangles with the back 4, with the occasional cross from a full back does not constitute 'great football'.
If the football was 'great', then we'd be opening teams up and scoring goals...and we are clearly not doing that.
I'm sorry, but I just don't see where this 'great football' is...yes, AT tries to get the players to PASS the ball...but this is not the definition of 'great football', Andy....
Joke defending, a keeper who is a dodgy catcher of a ball, a midfield who do not beat their man nor get in many crosses, and only one player in the team to have scored more than 2 goals also leads me to believe that we are not playing '...great football..'.
And if AT is hell bent on this appraisal of the team he manages, a record of 2 wins in 21 would suggest that the football is not '...great...'.
The conclusion to all of this....I have always said we need to give AT half a season...well, even if he wins the next 3 games, we'll only have 22 points from 23 games and that's relegation numbers.
Sorry, AT, nice guy and all that, but we MUST AVOID RELEGATION AT ALL COSTS, and if that means trying someone else to get more from these players then so be it...we could do with the impetus from a new manager (just like AT had in March/April)...we need to try and achieve what Burnley/Millwall/Bristol C have done and strive for a couple/three wins...that's all that's needed to get back in touch with the pack...if those shitty teams can do it, so can we with the players we have...surely??????