skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
Just caught some of the six nations on the Beeb and was just thinking how long would England legend Brian Moore last working for the BBC.
yes he’s comparing her language to the National Socialists - I wonder why? He also didn’t seem to cite any actual comparisons - I mean I’m sure he wasn’t trying to at all link the government to the Nazi party - I’m sure anyone who makes that comparison is really doing Gary a disservice
Today the shadow chancellor said his words wouldn’t have been what she would have said
Why on earth not?
I think several million Jewish people would have something to say about the semantics ! involed in his tweet.Not even semantics, he's talking about Bravermans language, its clear as crystal.
And regardless, if Neil, Sugar and others had been censored for their political comments I'd have no problem with the sme happening to Lineker, but they weren't.
I think several million Jewish people would have something to say about the semantics ! involed in his tweet.
If he wants to have his ridiculous say to be heard at not criticized , maybe he should stand down from his highly paid role at match of the day and stand in an election, and not use his position at the BBC for his unimpartial views.
I think several million Jewish people would have something to say about the semantics ! involed in his tweet.
If he wants to have his ridiculous say to be heard at not criticized , maybe he should stand down from his highly paid role at match of the day and stand in an election, and not use his position at the BBC for his unimpartial views.
hahahaWhatever problem you have with him don’t bring me into it
He said the language was similar which it is, your point is irrelevantThe difference between 1930s nazi Germany and Britain today Mr linaker is if you said anything against the Nazis in those times you would be in a ditch with a bullet in your face , he may want to remind himself of that when making ridiculous comparisons.
hahaha
oh grenners everyone thinks you're a c**t
this isn't really about Lineker or the language, it's all about the incompetence and lack of compassion in the Home Office, and is a total distraction form their failings.
Has anyone mentioned to you it’s 2023 and there’s a thing called ‘social media’ where people say what they think on their accounts to whoever chooses to look. You don’t have to look you know. He didn’t say it on his TV programme.Lineker should just stick to football the overpaid, big eared Leicester prick. No one wants to hear his personal political views. He should keep them to his friends and family and like minded people.
Why?Lineker should just stick to football the overpaid, big eared Leicester prick. No one wants to hear his personal political views. He should keep them to his friends and family and like minded people.
You can't compare economic migrants to the Holocaust. In power in 1930s Germany were the Nazis.
maybe Mr linaker and his million s should build a town with good facilities for these people in France a very safe country , far wealthier than ours at the moment or even start a regeneration program in they're country's of origin instead of biting the hand that feeds him.
I ve got a feeling he won't.
The policy in effect criminilises asylum seekers. It criminilises victims of rape, torture, and systemic abuse.You can't compare economic migrants to the Holocaust
Not even semantics, he's talking about Bravermans language, its clear as crystal.
And regardless, if Neil, Sugar and others had been censored for their political comments I'd have no problem with the sme happening to Lineker, but they weren't.
Suddenly you're a Rachael Reeves fan!
Well as labour chancellors go I’d prefer her to John McDonnell
He was quite complimentary about Corbyn at one point. I reckon he's a socialist in disguise.You've been quite complimentary about McDonnell!
I think the apologists are missing the point. Although he never actually uses the words , his meaning is all to obvious except for those who refuse to see it. He should apologize himself and either stick to presenting or stand down from motd.He didn't compare economic migrants to the holocaust.
You keep missing the point.
I’ve already spoken with themHas anyone mentioned to you it’s 2023 and there’s a thing called ‘social media’ where people say what they think on their accounts to whoever chooses to look. You don’t have to look you know. He didn’t say it on his TV programme.
Ps. Why are piping up on here rather than talking to your ‘friends and family and like minded people’?
"Shut up and dribble", right?I think the apologists are missing the point. Although he never actually uses the words , his meaning is all to obvious except for those who refuse to see it. He should apologize himself and either stick to presenting or stand down from motd.
I feel obliged to point out Oxford English is apologize, Chambers English is apologise."Shut up and dribble", right?
P.S. It's apologise. We ain't Yanquis.
I think the apologists are missing the point. Although he never actually uses the words , his meaning is all to obvious except for those who refuse to see it. He should apologize himself and either stick to presenting or stand down from motd.
You've been quite complimentary about McDonnell!
But when your employer relies on that government for its continued compulsory licence fee, maybe you should just use a little discretion and keep your gob shut and just continue to pick up your £1million salary.It's not about a personality it's about backing someone who is not afraid to speak out about this corrupt government
Because of his convictions yes but Reeves will be more John Major than McDonnell
Did you say the same when Alan Sugar was making actual, unambiguous, Nazi comparisons?
Who's Chambers? Did he play for us under Slade?I feel obliged to point out Oxford English is apologize, Chambers English is apologise.
2bf he never talked about the Jews specifically. In 1930s Germany - the nazis used similar language in describing - travellers, gypsies, political opponents, communists, trade unionists, migrants or any other undesirable Person they deemed unworthy.You can't compare economic migrants to the Holocaust. In power in 1930s Germany were the Nazis.
maybe Mr linaker and his million s should build a town with good facilities for these people in France a very safe country , far wealthier than ours at the moment or even start a regeneration program in they're country's of origin instead of biting the hand that feeds him.
I ve got a feeling he won't.
Absolutely mate. People have fallen for it in the past, but I hope not again. When the cost of living crisis means some families can't afford to heat their homes or feed their children surely they don't want to see the Government wasting their money in this rubbish. We have given £140 million to Rwanda for nothing.I'm sure I'm late to the party but this is it, this is the Tories play for the next GE.
It's the only way they have a chance, forget COVID, forget the living crisis, food banks, energy & gas prices, Brexit.
For the next two years, focus your hatred on the immigrants and those boats, tell you that labour will let in 'swarms of them' so you better vote for us unless you want to be living next to a foreigner.
It's going to get very nasty and people will fall for it.
This guy sums it up perfectly on QT, I'm surprised FionaBruceIsATory let him finish.
Sent from my M2101K6G using Tapatalk
While there is some truth about immigration being seen as the Tories trump card, (their only one) its also not about anyone living next door to a foreigner, that just debases the issue to one of racism, which it is not.I'm sure I'm late to the party but this is it, this is the Tories play for the next GE.
It's the only way they have a chance, forget COVID, forget the living crisis, food banks, energy & gas prices, Brexit.
For the next two years, focus your hatred on the immigrants and those boats, tell you that labour will let in 'swarms of them' so you better vote for us unless you want to be living next to a foreigner.
It's going to get very nasty and people will fall for it.
This guy sums it up perfectly on QT, I'm surprised FionaBruceIsATory let him finish.
Sent from my M2101K6G using Tapatalk
How are we still abiding to an EU law? ExplainWhile there is some truth about immigration being seen as the Tories trump card, its also not about anyone living next door to a foreigner, that just debases the issue to one of racism, which it is not.
We have numerous services that are under funded, NHS, Schools, councils, roads, etc etc, and just allowing free movement, unchecked of people into a country (any country) just continues the cost to the treasury of funding those services.
The overriding question is, if these people are in genuine fear of their lives, why didn't they plead asylum in France?
Under EU law (a treaty we are still bound by) anyone seeking asylum should do so at the first safe haven they come to. That way their numbers are allocated to member countries as per previous existing agreements.
People seeking assylum don't get to choose which country they fancy living in.
Massive misunderstanding there - there’s no law stating the first safe country. They absolutely can choose.While there is some truth about immigration being seen as the Tories trump card, its also not about anyone living next door to a foreigner, that just debases the issue to one of racism, which it is not.
We have numerous services that are under funded, NHS, Schools, councils, roads, etc etc, and just allowing free movement, unchecked of people into a country (any country) just continues the cost to the treasury of funding those services.
The overriding question is, if these people are in genuine fear of their lives, why didn't they plead asylum in France?
Under EU law (a treaty we are still bound by) anyone seeking asylum should do so at the first safe haven they come to. That way their numbers are allocated to member countries as per previous existing agreements.
People seeking assylum don't get to choose which country they fancy living in.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?