My point was when the agreement was done surely there must have been a clause if he had a bad injury while on loan with us we could not expect to be obliged to sign him , this current injury he has could come into this clauseWhat long term injury ? He played 32 games for Doncaster last season
Yes, we do. Given Kelly's injury record, and James' likewise
It’s a clickbait article from the CET.Why ain’t robins coming out and praising the lad and speaking about taking up the obligation ?
Nah he’s good at being private. Fully expect sheaf to sign and at £750k and at that price it’s a steal for me
I can’t believe you’ve just watched Hamer give away the ball twice for a goal and used that as an opportunity to have a go at Sheaf.Yes money stolen from our budget
I can’t believe you’ve just watched Hamer give away the ball twice for a goal and used that as an opportunity to have a go at Sheaf.
You’re such a perfect parody of a clueless Cov fan I really think it must be a windup.
Ha, your eyes alright or can you not read? Show me the bit where I say I rate Sheaf over Hamer?You rate Sheaf over Hamer and I am a wind up merchant.
My issue with Sheaf is our budget is really tight 750k in that particular position for me is a waste of funds just on potential and I don't think he did enough this season to justify that risk.
Ha, your eyes alright or can you not read? Show me the bit where I say I rate Sheaf over Hamer?
Sheaf isn’t worth 200k let alone 750k
He’s poor and at best league 1 standard, to pay 750k for him would be crazy and a complete waste
ou posted it two minutes after Hamer's mistake when Sheaf had been mentioned after the thread was dormant for sever hours. If that didn't inspire you to dredge up the thread what did? If it was notifications then you obviously weren't paying the game which makes sense as you haven't got a clue what you're on about. on this or anything else.I was wondering about your eyes, as I comment on a thread about Sheaf and his future, that I don't think we should pay 750k as I see it as a different type of steal to Pete. I was responding to Pete who had responded to me so he was on my notifications.
You said I used hamer giving the ball away as an opportunity to have a go at Sheaf
Go figure you brought Hamer into it not me wtf are you on about if you aren't comparing them wtf is your point?
Invest it elsewhere than wasting it on a player we don’t need.....James or sheaf? Oh yeah James
James is going to cost loads more in wages and not improve while he’s here, which is our entire financial model.
Name a 22 year old we can get for £750k who is better. One another Championship side has bought maybe.
Y
ou posted it two minutes after Hamer's mistake when Sheaf had been mentioned after the thread was dormant for sever hours. If that didn't inspire you to dredge up the thread what did? If it was notifications then you obviously weren't paying the game which makes sense as you haven't got a clue what you're on about. on this or anything else.
I was actually comparing them, I was alluding to one midfielder who cost £1.5m making the same mistakes a midfielder who (will) cost £750k makes. I didn't say I prefer one or the other. Just pointing out the hypocrisy that people can say one is shit and one is brilliant when they do much of the same in so many games.
Do you get that or do I need to say it slower in single syllable words?
I just knew you would be getting involved in anotber sheaf debate mr FrostieExactly.
Decent point of comparison would be his Midfield partner at Doncaster last season - Ben Whiteman.
Different sort of player to be fair & 24 years old so more at his prime (but less potential to develop). Similarly not played above League One previously but joined Preston for more than double the touted Sheaf fee.
Absolute uproar from Doncaster fans too that they didn't get more than that too.
Still think he will be a decent signing and add a bit of depth to our squad. With Hamer, Sheaf, James, Kelly(?), Eccles its a good selection to pick from. Allows us to focus in other areas.Sheaf was at the Ricoh with the rest of the squad yesterday.
Seems odd to send him back to Arsenal for treatment and then drag him back here to look round the Ricoh if he's not going to be here next season...
The fact the deal dragged out so long when he came tells me we wanted to have a look before we buy,as you say in regards to robins he’s seen plentyThe first thing is can Robins and the coaching staff develop players? I think we have seen a number of players develop here so yes.
Do they have the raw skills?
Do they have the right attitude to training and the ambition to develop?
In the case of Ben Sheaf I am sure Mark Robins has seen enough to answer the above and already knows whether he will stick or twist.
There were suggestions that a clause in the agreement with Arsenal that if we stayed up, we would buy himThe fact the deal dragged out so long when he came tells me we wanted to have a look before we buy,as you say in regards to robins he’s seen plenty
Not necessarily if it was described as an obligation to buy rather than an option. There are myriad reasons why it may have been structured that way, from the perspective of both clubs and the player himself. I think the most likely is CCFC status and cash flowThe fact the deal dragged out so long when he came tells me we wanted to have a look before we buy,as you say in regards to robins he’s seen plenty
Probably although I suspect the injury issues betterdays mentioned may have also played a part.Not necessarily if it was described as an obligation to buy rather than an option. There are myriad reasons why it may have been structured that way, from the perspective of both clubs and the player himself. I think the most likely is CCFC status and cash flow
Honestly be amazed if we aren't seriously in for Walsh though. Then talk of maybe offering this Colkett lad a deal really does mean would have loads of defensive central midfielders.I think he will be a decent signing, certainly good enough for the bench, and he and Eccles will be good cover for Kelly, James and Hamer.
We really need to move on from Walsh, yes he was great for us in league 1 but he seems to be one of those players who gets better and better the longer he doesnt play.Honestly be amazed if we aren't seriously in for Walsh though. Then talk of maybe offering this Colkett lad a deal really does mean would have loads of defensive central midfielders.
We really need to move on from Walsh, yes he was great for us in league 1 but he seems to be one of those players who gets better and better the longer he doesnt play.
You're just forgetting how good he was, you don't win multiple awards playing for the champions and get into the team of the season for nothing.We really need to move on from Walsh, yes he was great for us in league 1 but he seems to be one of those players who gets better and better the longer he doesnt play.
You're just forgetting how good he was, you don't win multiple awards playing for the champions and get into the team of the season for nothing.
https://www.facebook.com/
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?