He's watching the under 18s this morning with Thomas Finch, Whitmore and Shpley.Standing just next to me. Kelly Evans twins just arrived
It is believe meSounds painful
Shoot me down for this but sisu's thinking with Stevenson is most probably sell now for 2mill plus add ons because what sort of fee can we command if we dont sell this window and we get relegated to league 2?
Hindsight is always difficult, but a lot would depend on whether his post transfer form was because of the transfer, or just what was going to happen anyway.if we had have held on to Madison and been promoted how much more would he have been worth if we'd sold him in the summer?
The dynamic around him changed from the standsHindsight is always difficult, but a lot would depend on whether his post transfer form was because of the transfer, or just what was going to happen anyway.
I honestly think they just have no clue about the game. They don't understand player value or transfer windows or anything else. Just figures on a spreadsheet.
Which players have they stood firm and negotiated a decent deal on? I can't think of one. We've sold everyone at the first sniff of interest.
Gary Borrowdale was a good deal
Another way to look at it in sisu,s prospective is the tax year ends in april and im assuming the accounts need publishing around the same months so january falls at a perfect time to claw back loses with sales and investors to see the accounts figures in the green. (thinking away from football just as a business to try understand the logic).
Nope, company accounts are made up to a set date, for the CCFC companies this happens to be the end of May. The accounts should be published 10 months later, i.e. the end of Feb.
The main issue is cash flow, generally for a Football Club the flow is highly positive for the short time season tickets are on sale, then fairly steady across the rest of the season and highly negative in the summer when there is no gate money. The transfer window in January provides an opportunity to top up a sickly looking bank account.
Another way to look at it in sisu,s prospective is the tax year ends in april and im assuming the accounts need publishing around the same months so january falls at a perfect time to claw back loses with sales and investors to see the accounts figures in the green. (thinking away from football just as a business to try understand the logic).
The personal tax year ends in April. Corporations are different. Their end of year is usually on the anniversary of when they form.
We've just signed 3 players on the opening day of the transfer window.Our cash flow can't be too bad in the summer as most of the players will be out of contract and we sign any new ones at the last second
We've just signed 3 players on the opening day of the transfer window.
And lost how many?We've just signed 3 players on the opening day of the transfer window.
And lost how many?
.
Actions have consequences.
That's true. For instance. If a club goes out of its way to piss off it's fan base, sorry, customer base its hardly surprising that said customer base is leaving bringing hardship on said business.
There seems to be less of an issue ATM. Players are coming in before they have all gone for once.We'll find out at 11pm 31st January.
Not sure what the issue is. We've always sold our best and we always will. Particularly now when we are skint.
Actions have consequences.
Yes it has always happened that I remember. But the lack of replacing them in recent years has hurt us badly.Yeah fair comment. Its the rest of us left to see players sold, but as i said it has always happened. Gary Gillespie is the first I remember being pissed off about.
We've always sold our best and we always will.
Not at the first sniff Torch. I remember us turning down offers. I remember there being rumours of players leaving without it immediately happening.
No one has caused us to lose money. This myth that it's the fans fault is just that. When a club has no success crowds drop, that's all there is to it. If they want higher crowds, they have to get higher up the league.
Yes it has always happened that I remember. But the lack of replacing them in recent years has hurt us badly.
But not enough to pay their wages. That is why we are here now.Presumably we had enough money to run the club AND buy players but those days are long gone.
But not enough to pay their wages. That is why we are here now.
But what I meant is we sell and don't even put just 20% back into purchasing a replacement. Someone who then could be sold for a profit at a later date. We are always going backwards. And then we are in competition for the free signings with everyone else.
Sounds like party time TorchAll true but as i say that is where we are now.
True, so it shouldn't be a surprise we have to sell regardless of who we are blaming today. Apparently we've turned down two offers from Brentford, so maybe we're learning to negotiate at last.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?