18 games in 2 years, we should stay well clear.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
You would then have to sign 2 more centre backs as there's no emergency loans apparently next season, otherwise ricketts and harries will be playing most of the season. No, we should just leave both well alone.That's less than Reda
Both on a pay as you play
If some rumours are to be believed
RCC
WILLIS
TURNER
STEPHENS
STOKES
VINCELOT
GHADZEV
FLYNN
BAKER
JONES
CLARKE
I know this won't happen , but that would be top 6 surely
We are obsessed with ex players.Please can people stop with the Carl Baker talk.
Jesus fucking Christ....
We are obsessed with ex players.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
I said No, no, no
I would like Turner and Reda as our CB pairing, TM wants dominant defenders.
However, the injury records for both players is a issue, we need a solid, stable back 4 next season.
I would be happy to offer them both pay as you play deals, even if its until January with a clause to give them a 1 year deal that is triggered if they play X amount of games
Luckily MKD want to offer him a new deal, don't they?
Trouble is even if we signed/re-signed both of them, they'd probably never be fit at the same time.
Both turner and Johnson injury prone and both left footed...I think even if both fit TM would only play one of them. If we can get turner then take him
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
What injuries has he had? If the medical staff are confident in his fitness I would love to have him here.
Ankles are made of glass if I remember rightly, his injury here looked innocuous I think. I think he jumped up with a header and when he landed it didn't look particularly painful but he injured it for another 4 months in the landing impact.
Maybe if we had both, we might get 25 games between the twoI'd take him back, even if we only got half a season, low wage and high appearance fee though, same as any deal for Reda. Not sure I'd want them both though, depends on how much they would cost when injured.
Think about it this way, we had both of them last season at different times, and they still only covered about half the season between them. Too much risk I'm afraid. I think Ben and Reda are great players, but it's no good if they are not on the pitch for at least 60-70% of the season.Maybe if we had both, we might get 25 games between the two
<snip> depends on how much they would cost when injured.
Think about it this way, we had both of them last season at different times, and they still only covered about half the season between them. Too much risk I'm afraid. I think Ben and Reda are great players, but it's no good if they are not on the pitch for at least 60-70% of the season.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?