I would probably say either AT or MA, because (in my eyes at least) they have achieved something with little money or backing. The Adams era was before the SISU saga, so he obviously had better backing than Thorn, and this is reflected in the success he achieved. We finished eight is in his first season, but the following tailed away and he was sacked. Secondly, and I hear you cry, What success has Andy Thorn achieved? For me, he has and is doing a remarkable job. We are within touching distance of safety, and I think many of us expected us to be way off at this point. He has very little backing from the board, which makes his job even harder, look at players sold and their replacements. Some people may complain about his tactical naivety, I.e. sooner sube etc, but you have t remember that this is his first coaching job, and therefore I think you have to cut him some slack.