What is other peoples opinion, on the theory that the Ricoh was a poorly build stadium for playing football in?
We could in theory play better in different stadiums where football was the main focus...like Highfield Road was. Most the threads before we moved out of the Ricoh seemed to have the opinion that we played better away from home, than when we did at the Ricoh. Is there something about the Ricoh that has a negative effect on players? The changing rooms? Something with the pitch and distance from the crowd?
I really hope CCFC play back in Coventry again...but, I am skeptical if I want it to be at the Ricoh.
Never been in the changing rooms but be interested to know from somebody if they are to a good standard? I have been at pitch level and in the dugouts, it just felt generic and grey, nothing screamed out this is CCFC's football stadium...its is municipal and can be converted for different sports and events in no time at all.
Good point..but it's the fans that make the stadium.highfield rd in it's day was a great atmosphere but was dated.The ricoh is a great ground.fill it with swansea or cardiff fans and it would be an intimidating place to go.10, 000 cov fans in it with nothing to cheer about and its an empty souless bowl....could be a great ground but it might never get the chance to be*one.
It is rather different to many stadia, particularly the Lloyds Pharmacy stand..
and you can google the changing rooms http://farm7.staticflickr.com/6123/5990314948_5b33b71132_o.jpg
The Ricoh is great stadium.It needs better space utilisation, I accept too much area between the pitch and seatings. Advertising hoardings need to be brought up to the grass area. The red area around the pitch needs to be covered by seating, or terracing.Terracing is allowed in the 3 and fouth tier. Since the ricoh is never full the higher tier seating need to to closed off not used .
So those of us who won"t go to Northampton are boo boys, interesting viewpoint.The team play better away from the boo boys, the 'fans' who go to shout abuse don't generally go to away games or sixfields. The players can then play without fear of being jumped on for one bad pass
What is other peoples opinion, on the theory that the Ricoh was a poorly build stadium for playing football in?
We could in theory play better in different stadiums where football was the main focus...like Highfield Road was. Most the threads before we moved out of the Ricoh seemed to have the opinion that we played better away from home, than when we did at the Ricoh. Is there something about the Ricoh that has a negative effect on players? The changing rooms? Something with the pitch and distance from the crowd?
I really hope CCFC play back in Coventry again...but, I am skeptical if I want it to be at the Ricoh.
So 1200 at sixfields in a 7500 seater is better ?Maybe it's because there are now only fans that want to get behind them rather that shouting we want SISU out which does not help the players on the pitch??
It also doesn't help when you have a 32000 seater stadium with only 10000 fans spread out all around the stadium, just no real atmosphere.
I'm not a Sisu fan,and i want them out as much as anyone.If (and it's a big if)Fisher gets a stadium go ahead would you start going to NTFC.
So those of us who won"t go to Northampton are boo boys, interesting viewpoint.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?