Better without Hamer? (1 Viewer)

Warthog

Well-Known Member
In the two games he hasn’t featured in this season we have beaten top of the league 4-1 and got a point away at second
 

Warthog

Well-Known Member
Thankfully for you, Stevie G is spunking the whole of the January budget on Gus!

Evidently I’m not his biggest fan but I would happily double our money on him and get a better partner for Sheaf (who was superb again yesterday). I think atm I prefer Hamer to Kelly but you cannot question the results we have had without Hamer.

Hamer tends to be half a yard off the pace of a game which is why he gets booked so often. Either way from what I’ve heard I have a feeling he will be heading closer to Holland this year for reasons best not disclosed on a public forum.
 

stay_up_skyblues

Well-Known Member
giphy.gif
 

GaryMabbuttsLeftKnee

Well-Known Member
Evidently I’m not his biggest fan but I would happily double our money on him and get a better partner for Sheaf (who was superb again yesterday). I think atm I prefer Hamer to Kelly but you cannot question the results we have had without Hamer.

Hamer tends to be half a yard off the pace of a game which is why he gets booked so often. Either way from what I’ve heard I have a feeling he will be heading closer to Holland this year for reasons best not disclosed on a public forum.

Barring a ten minute spell that came off the back of Bournemouth going down to ten men, we were completely outplayed yesterday. I’m not saying Hamer would have completely changed that, but using yesterday as a yard stick to measure how well we do without him is disingenuous


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Warthog

Well-Known Member
Lol god we have clueless WUM

If Hamer played we would have won that. Missed his drives forward.

Check your likes to posts ratio and then tell me who is clueless. Clearly the forum can see I have a much better understanding of the game from you. All the clueless ones on this forum don’t live in cov and presumably don’t make many games. I’ll add you to that list
 

pusbccfc

Well-Known Member
Yesterday was the most obvious example of how important he is. Before the red we offered nothing going forward and a lot of that is because we missed Hamer and his driving runs.
 

Warthog

Well-Known Member
Lol god we have clueless WUM

If Hamer played we would have won that. Missed his drives forward.

You only get one like for every two posts you make so half your posts must be nonsense.

Our two best results came without Hamer. I simply asked a question on a forum I even said my preferred pair is Hamer and Sheaf and you’re calling me clueless. Throwing insults because I asked a question lol. Typical of this forum
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Check your likes to posts ratio and then tell me who is clueless. Clearly the forum can see I have a much better understanding of the game from you. All the clueless ones on this forum don’t live in cov and presumably don’t make many games. I’ll add you to that list

You are Grendel Jnr and I claim £5
 

Jamesimus

Well-Known Member
Check your likes to posts ratio and then tell me who is clueless. Clearly the forum can see I have a much better understanding of the game from you. All the clueless ones on this forum don’t live in cov and presumably don’t make many games. I’ll add you to that list

Don't get stuff like this. What does living in Coventry have to do with anything?

You can get a better picture of the game on ifollow than you can at the game, no question. Benefits of replays, knowing what player has done what etc (as long as you don't take Clive Eakins word as gospel...).

Obviously the atmosphere isn't the same but if I get the dog to bark incessantly and play crowd noise through my TV it's most of the way there. Plus when we score outside of normal time I can throw myself down the stairs like I'm really there.
 

Legia Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Check your likes to posts ratio and then tell me who is clueless. Clearly the forum can see I have a much better understanding of the game from you. All the clueless ones on this forum don’t live in cov and presumably don’t make many games. I’ll add you to that list

Hope you recognise the boost I've just given to your likes per post ratio!
 

skybluesam66

Well-Known Member
Don't get stuff like this. What does living in Coventry have to do with anything?

You can get a better picture of the game on ifollow than you can at the game, no question. Benefits of replays, knowing what player has done what etc (as long as you don't take Clive Eakins word as gospel...).

Obviously the atmosphere isn't the same but if I get the dog to bark incessantly and play crowd noise through my TV it's most of the way there. Plus when we score outside of normal time I can throw myself down the stairs like I'm really there.
james- sorry you are wrong - you get a much better picture being there - the camera follows the ball- . if you watch the game properly you can pick up the runs, positioning etc
 

Londonccfcfan

Well-Known Member
You only get one like for every two posts you make so half your posts must be nonsense.

Our two best results came without Hamer. I simply asked a question on a forum I even said my preferred pair is Hamer and Sheaf and you’re calling me clueless. Throwing insults because I asked a question lol. Typical of this forum
Lol...wtf? I'm not 16.....likes per post ratio...???

How sad.
 
Evidently I’m not his biggest fan but I would happily double our money on him and get a better partner for Sheaf (who was superb again yesterday). I think atm I prefer Hamer to Kelly but you cannot question the results we have had without Hamer.

Hamer tends to be half a yard off the pace of a game which is why he gets booked so often. Either way from what I’ve heard I have a feeling he will be heading closer to Holland this year for reasons best not disclosed on a public forum.

Heard from a geezer at the rugby club that his sons pal is shagging hamers wife That’s probably why hamer been of the mark
 

PUSB-We_are_going_up

Well-Known Member
Evidently I’m not his biggest fan but I would happily double our money on him and get a better partner for Sheaf (who was superb again yesterday). I think atm I prefer Hamer to Kelly but you cannot question the results we have had without Hamer.

Hamer tends to be half a yard off the pace of a game which is why he gets booked so often. Either way from what I’ve heard I have a feeling he will be heading closer to Holland this year for reasons best not disclosed on a public forum.
Or half a yard ahead
 

PUSB-We_are_going_up

Well-Known Member
Check your likes to posts ratio and then tell me who is clueless. Clearly the forum can see I have a much better understanding of the game from you. All the clueless ones on this forum don’t live in cov and presumably don’t make many games. I’ll add you to that list
I think quite a bit of it are people laughing buddy, you do sometimes have a good point but still
 

Jamesimus

Well-Known Member
Lol...wtf? I'm not 16.....likes per post ratio...???

How sad.

How do you find out your likes per post ratio, not that I'm at all interested and seeking validation, merely extremely curious and want to curate my posts specifically to get more likes and zero poos.

james- sorry you are wrong - you get a much better picture being there - the camera follows the ball- . if you watch the game properly you can pick up the runs, positioning etc

Also, I'll be sure to @ you in the match threads when you need to know who got the assist for the 8th goal against WBA
 

Paxman II

Well-Known Member
Hamer, Kelly, Sheaf is our best mix. They need to play together more often to form an understanding. Kelly was very good yesterday and whenever he gets forward he has a knack of creating something. Did that brilliantly yesterday and a great nutmeg.
Sheaf improving al the time, getting very dependable. Can't remember his last giveaway ball now! Hamer is the grid iron you need. He will tap ankles and let you know you're in for a tough game. Has that ability to score more and would like to see him venture forward more at times. Set pieces he are very good.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top