Timing. Anyway, why can't CCFC(H) Ltd & SBS&L find them? They seem to include some pretty important documents!
Frankly my dear, that's bullshit. The two statements don't have to contradict each other. You want to build a case, you have to make it watertight and x + y = 97 doesn't.
Still, interesting to know what we paid for Julian Darby and the fact that the Premier League Golden Share looks like it was made on 123certificates.com
I don't know enough about company law to comment. And I'd go back to asking if there was impropriety why have no bidders/creditors complained?
Still, interesting to know what we paid for Julian Darby and the fact that the Premier League Golden Share looks like it was made on 123certificates.com
Nobody seem to ask the question: Where did he get them ... who gave them to him?
no they don't, but the burden is on SISU to prove this. until that has taken place they contradict each other.
your far too quick to give them the benefit of doubt.
Because Bob have them?
Nobody seem to ask the question: Where did he get them ... who gave them to him?
does it matter?
surely the important question is why the documents weren't available in the administration process, who was holding on to them?
Nobody seem to ask the question: Where did he get them ... who gave them to him?
When is the reconvened Judicial Review?
I believe appeal hearing on 28th Nov, not sure if judgement will come then or after a further delay?
I really wish you'd stop repeating yourself...
I however will repeat myself. if you can;t see how those two statements don't contradict each other, then look again.
And look again.
And again until you do see that. take away the skewed glasses, and look at the words you quoted, and what's in front of you.
So when hinting people are liars, make sure there's a valid statement behind that, as opposed to a desperation to link things together.
Because Bob have them?
Nobody seem to ask the question: Where did he get them ... who gave them to him?
I think it matters.
Who is feeding Bob and leaking documents? What's his interest?
clearly i don't have as many GCSE's as you so why don't you help out a fellow CCFC fan and explain it to me, dumb it down for me please?
in who's interest was it for the documents to be in hiding?
Julian Darby's?
to get to the bottom of the truth would be my guess.
in who's interest was it for the documents to be in hiding?
Where does it say he's just passed them on?
Does that matter?
My guess though would be Joe Elliott.
The last filed accounts of Limited and Holdings would seem to match the 1995 documents exactly. I suggest Appleton may now have issues with his Insolvency Practitioners Association, start writing.
Ah, you think it's done to bring out the truth?
Well, I am not sure how these old documents can tell the truth of today.
And why do you think the documents have been hidden? Maybe they have already been shown to Appelton together with more recent documents making the old ones void and of no importance.
I don't know, but I can't dismiss the possibility. Can you?
Ah, you think it's done to bring out the truth?
Well, I am not sure how these old documents can tell the truth of today.
And why do you think the documents have been hidden? Maybe they have already been shown to Appelton together with more recent documents making the old ones void and of no importance.
I don't know, but I can't dismiss the possibility. Can you?
Correct, SISU obviously not disclosed documents otherwise why would their lawyers write the letter of 22 March to the Football League? They have blatantly lied to the FL and Administrators
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?