ovduk78
Well-Known Member
Yes he was, wasn't sureNo, signed by Gould in 1984.
Yes he was, wasn't sureNo, signed by Gould in 1984.
Well I'm in the minority. I really enjoyed the commentary today. Our front 3 did look isolated first half and Gouldy stated that he wanted more from them. He was equally quick to praise the team for the second half performance. But best of all he really loves this club and it was really great to hear that passion. I'd like him commentating more often.
In terms of the performance, Burge, and the back 4 VERY impressive again. Doyle and Kelly nicely controlling things in the middle. It was also great to see a set up where we have pace on both sides of the park in DKE and Jones. Jones is simply having a huge season and is an absolute nightmare for League 1 full backs. We'll be lucky to keep him in the next window. I'm a big fan of the Duck but we do need to get him running at defenders more often. Biamou didn't look entirely out of place but I didn't think he really kicked on today from his decent substitute appearance last week. We should have won by 3 or 4. It was a dominant performance.
I think Vincenti offers something but I don't see him as a wide man - team looked more balanced today with real pace on the flanks.
Yes I'd agree with that, I said last week that we are unbalanced with Vincenti on the left, hopefully DKE will become a good option from now on.Well I'm in the minority. I really enjoyed the commentary today. Our front 3 did look isolated first half and Gouldy stated that he wanted more from them. He was equally quick to praise the team for the second half performance. But best of all he really loves this club and it was really great to hear that passion. I'd like him commentating more often.
In terms of the performance, Burge, and the back 4 VERY impressive again. Doyle and Kelly nicely controlling things in the middle. It was also great to see a set up where we have pace on both sides of the park in DKE and Jones. Jones is simply having a huge season and is an absolute nightmare for League 1 full backs. We'll be lucky to keep him in the next window. I'm a big fan of the Duck but we do need to get him running at defenders more often. Biamou didn't look entirely out of place but I didn't think he really kicked on today from his decent substitute appearance last week. We should have won by 3 or 4. It was a dominant performance.
I think Vincenti offers something but I don't see him as a wide man - team looked more balanced today with real pace on the flanks.
So if we don't get a 'one on one' in a game it means we didn't get a chance all game?Not really, a shot could be from 50 yards. A chance is a one on one
It was an example of what a "chance" is.So if we don't get a 'one on one' in a game it means we didn't get a chance all game?
We missed some serious chances today. The chances were not the issue here today, it was how we finished that wasn't clinical. We need a decent striker in Jan!It was an example of what a "chance" is.
Just because it was a shot, it doesn't mean it was a chance created.
The opposition could make us resort to lame shots from outside the box which don't trouble them in the slightest.
We missed some serious chances today. The chances were not the issue here today, it was how we finished that wasn't clinical. We need a decent striker in Jan!
He just praised them for the 2nd half performance
No different to this thread
Not every shot from outside the box is a lame shot.It was an example of what a "chance" is.
Just because it was a shot, it doesn't mean it was a chance created.
The opposition could make us resort to lame shots from outside the box which don't trouble them in the slightest.
Not every shot from outside the box is a lame shot.
What do we call a 20+ yarder that flies into the top corner?
What is a shot, if not a chance?
What about that lame daisycutter that our new keeper managed to dive over a few weeks ago? The striker claimed it, the statititions put it down as a shot on target, therefor it's hard to say it wasn't a chance.
I know, but you can have 50 shots that are never troubling the keeper ever. Grasscutters, straight to the keeper and not have an actual decent chance.
"Chances" are generally when it's expected we get a goal from it. ie Jones and Biamou today.
It wasn't really a chance.. He shouldn't have scored it.What about that lame daisycutter that our new keeper managed to dive over a few weeks ago? The striker claimed it, the statititions put it down as a shot on target, therefor it's hard to say it wasn't a chance.
John Gayle would look like Lukaku in this league
Next week Gould explains the reason he signed Graham Withey
Kwame thomas scored from 25 yards today for Sutton Utd. He hit a very lame free kick that was skilfully avoided by every player and the keeper and ended up in the net. If you see the goal you'd hardly call it a chance, but they all count.
Wow, I thought I was the only person that didn't rate RegisRegis was shite and said until Sillett came he'd almost given up on football. Same for Bennett.
Not if it's rolling along the floor, I didn't say just one on one I mean clear cut chances.
Not really, a shot could be from 50 yards. A chance is a one on one
Yep, we did today. He was on about the last game however when they weren't really clear cut chances like we had today and the shots stat didn't really show that.
We probably had less shots today, but with Biamou, Jones and Duck missing very good chances.
Gould would have been better off signing Crystal Gayle, think she would have offered more upfront.Look like but not play like. Despite years of lower league dross, Gayle is still the worst player I've ever seen
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
A Goal?B-)Not every shot from outside the box is a lame shot.
What do we call a 20+ yarder that flies into the top corner?
Glad you both agree on somethingYou say potato, I say potato.
Erm.... Yes you did!
It was an example...
Because it was an example of a "chance", quite obviously.
Another thread, here you are being a prick with no input to the actual topic. You actually have to be a little bit clever to play clever buggers.
Still no input to anything about the match yesterday I see?
When you show up to join in its usually a good sign somebody else is right, you are consistently wrong.Err How can I? I never went to the game, and as others have said, "I'm not entitled to give my opinions coz I wasn't there" As for being a "Prick" The major player is YOU mate! You were wrong, but like Grendel, would never admit it!