A more effective approach might be get to the trust's undeserved position as de facto spokesperson for all CCFC fan groups challenged and changed. That is a good story in itself and a good outcome would be for our group on SBT, as the largest and best voice of our club's supporters, to have the ear of the public in the local and national media that we deserve.What would it achieve? It would achieve pissing their fans off enough to maybe learn a bit about our situation. It would piss Eastwood and Co off enough to maybe understand our situation amd what were capable of as a family group. He'll realise that were not all anti sisu/pro w**ps like the lovely picture the trust have painted for them!
Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk
And I want a twelve inch penisA more effective approach might be get to the trust's undeserved position as de facto spokesperson for all CCFC fan groups challenged and changed. That is a good story in itself and a good outcome would be for our group on SBT, as the largest and best voice of our club's supporters, to have the ear of the public in the local and national media that we deserve.
I am sure there will be a free plinth Shortly as I think there are some complaints And people have been offended by a nude women mincing around the city on horsebackLet’s put in in front of the council offices
A more effective approach might be get to the trust's undeserved position as de facto spokesperson for all CCFC fan groups challenged and changed. That is a good story in itself and a good outcome would be for our group on SBT, as the largest and best voice of our club's supporters, to have the ear of the public in the local and national media that we deserve.
And I want a twelve inch penis
Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk
I am sure there will be a free plinth Shortly as I think there are some complaints And people have been offended by a nude women mincing around the city on horseback
It was interesting in a story the other day, it had some views from Sky Blues Talk. Swiftly changed when they got a call from the Trust and then the Sky Blues Talk reference went.
It does need the Trust to be undermined at every chance with the media.
Very kind of you.I will bring mine round next time you go to work.
I am sure there will be a free plinth Shortly as I think there are some complaints And people have been offended by a nude women mincing around the city on horseback
What the trust said on that occasion was actually quite positive to be fair.
I’ve been saying this for ages now. I wanted a boycott of all wasps affiliations and businesses around the Ricoh.Hit them in the pocket and those that support them. They've got a list of affiliated pubs on their web site that fans should steer clear of. Shame post Covid but if you nail your flag to that mast, that's the consequence. Maybe their chums at Wasps will bung them more than just a few free tickets.
Totally agree with this, no interest now in ever setting foot in that ground again. I would rather us erase all elements that have our club from the ground and be done with it. Take the bricks, the crest, statue and garden and make this final.But what would that actually achieve other than making the club and fans look fucking ridiculous? Fuck wasps and CCC. If you want to stick it to them, get a season ticket at Andrews and support the club and watch wasps die on their arses and then the council be left with an empty stadium
It was interesting in a story the other day, it had some views from Sky Blues Talk. Swiftly changed when they got a call from the Trust and then the Sky Blues Talk reference went.
It does need the Trust to be undermined at every chance with the media.
I’ve been saying this for ages now. I wanted a boycott of all wasps affiliations and businesses around the Ricoh.
That will soon get council attention
I say fuck them, we need a BIG statement! Something they camt fucking ignore!
It appears one of our so called fan groups person is in over drive on twitter.
I don't really understand their "right" to be saying it. They don't appear to be a legitimate organisation. Do they have a constitution and rules? Are they abiding by their rules? Do their rules allow them to issue statements whenever they like, purporting to represent the views of their members without ever consulting them? Where's the transparency?What the trust said on that occasion was actually quite positive to be fair.
I'll go for the trust nobody option, personally.Dave Boddy can be trusted
He's an honest man doing his best and acting honourably
As for Wasps and their cronies at the council
Recent events have pretty much shown their true colours
Who?
PSB
The tide is definitely turning on wasps. More and more anti wasps posts on Facebook group and all over twitter than i have ever seen Before
Well you’re not having mineAnd I want a twelve inch penis
Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk
He's your brother, quite right you don't give him away.Well you’re not having mine
I bet PSB group hates his mates being shouted down. The bellend.
A prime example of somebody made to feel special by wasps to push their shit for them.Jesus that guy is having a proper melt down bless him, what a horrible c**t
A prime example of somebody made to feel special by wasps to push their shit for them.
I was blocked many moons ago. Luckily dont have to look at anything the bloke says!Jesus that guy is having a proper melt down bless him, what a horrible c**t
They'll just divert and find another angle to bash CCFC/SISUOnce this all comes out and if it is wasps found to be in the wrong i can't wait to see what happens with all these special accounts and their viewpoints
Same as always, they go quiet for a bit. Then come back again next time something is said.Once this all comes out and if it is wasps found to be in the wrong i can't wait to see what happens with all these special accounts and their viewpoints
I got angry with myself for getting into arguments with him time and time againI was blocked many moons ago. Luckily dont have to look at anything the bloke says!
Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk
I don't really understand their "right" to be saying it. They don't appear to be a legitimate organisation. Do they have a constitution and rules? Are they abiding by their rules? Do their rules allow them to issue statements whenever they like, purporting to represent the views of their members without ever consulting them? Where's the transparency?
What is to stop Sky Blues Talk forming a more influential organisation representing a larger constituency? Or do we have to infiltrate the trust and take over? Is either (or both) of these approaches possible?
What, in the same way that Wasps and CCC notified the football club when they were doing the Ricoh deal?Just a couple of points, Wasps say they weren't consulted before the UoW announcement by the Club, but what the fuck was it to do with them? the Club didn't need their permission to agree a deal with someone else, and if all the negotiations are finished in Wasps terminology "for the foreseeable future", why do the Club need to stick with the NDA?? it's not as if Wasps will kick us out again.
I know and I really shouldn't tag him for the nth time asking the same question but I'm just so frustrated that we have someone on here who claims to be a city fan and had the power to try and change things but doesn't. Look at Pete and Mark, they have achieved so much more than the local press in getting answers, it all stinks to high heaven
To be 100% fair to the Cov Tel on this occasion, there's a lot going on there and within the Trinity Group... sadly for us, the CCFC/Wasps situation is not necessarily number one priority at the moment.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?