dongonzalos
Well-Known Member
If it is correct that they would control any administration then Unfortunately I concede
That you are correct. Death by 1000 cuts.
Looks like we will need to get behind the kids and hope they can cause a shock
You're all guessers! I'm one too - so let's not pretend we have any idea what Admin will cost us or what the club will be worth.
I see NO BENEFIT in SISU selecting the admin route. It can't be clearer since they are the major creditor. If we owed the banks and the revenue (which I guess could still happen as things are moved around) there would be a different picture, but otherwise it makes no logical sense for them.
Imo what they are trying to do is to cut as many costs as possible so that the team eventually breaks even or better. When that equilibrium is achieved, whatever league we happen to be in matters to them not one iota even if its the conference or lower. The only way they can now recoup their investment is to get hold of the revenue streams for all of the other associated schhemes at the Ricoh.
They can feed whatever lines they want as PR and appoint as manay new boards as they see fit, but they are clear that without gambling in a way they are not prepared to fund, we will not reach the promised land of the EPL. Without that golden carrot to aim for their is little in it for them other than the Ricoh. However, to walk away or go down the admin route will not hold much opinion to their investors who are their only real customers. Mr ABC who lives thousands of miles away does not care about Coventry City but does care about his investment and their duty is to get the best possible return on that.
If it is correct that they would control any administration then Unfortunately I concede
That you are correct. Death by 1000 cuts.
Looks like we will need to get behind the kids and hope they can cause a shock
We did it in the early 80's under milne and Sexton ,guess what they sold em all!!!
And they really were good.
Best team in a generation really ,should have propelled the future of the club on a successful basis for many a year ,who was chairman back then ,was it Pointon or did he come after,Common denominator lousy chairman
I believe (I don't know why) it was some guy called Ian Jamieson. Pointon was later.
We did it in the early 80's under milne and Sexton ,guess what they sold em all!!!
Yes unfortunately any kids who does well will be sold and replaced with a new one. My gut feeling is though division 4 would be the place where this approach maybe sustainable not division 3.
Yes unfortunately any kids who does well will be sold and replaced with a new one. My gut feeling is though division 4 would be the place where this approach maybe sustainable not division 3.
In the early 80's we sold a whole host of young players who all had already real experience and quality (in honesty a lot more than the current crop). We sold the lot to keep the club going and replaced them with a host of players from the 3rd and 4th tier of english football. We had one experienced player from the Premier (Div One then) who was hopeless.
We were bookies favourites to be relegated by Christmas.
We stayed up.
Spot the difference between then and now.
I can't read the Offal at work. Could somebody please summarise what the article says please?
Nobody????
In the early 80's we sold a whole host of young players who all had already real experience and quality (in honesty a lot more than the current crop). We sold the lot to keep the club going and replaced them with a host of players from the 3rd and 4th tier of english football. We had one experienced player from the Premier (Div One then) who was hopeless.
We were bookies favourites to be relegated by Christmas.
We stayed up.
Spot the difference between then and now.
Nobody????
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?