Well they bought them knowing there was planning for a 15000 stadium at some point plus other development
The idea of dropping legal action is reasonable. But it needs to be on the proviso of 'drop the legal action, and we will help you make this happen if you are going to do this' rather than 'drop the legal action and we might have a little think about it'
Let's be honest - CCC haven't exactly demonstrated truthfulness and honesty over the last 18 months have they?
So if that was the case why would they leave it to CRFC to initially bring this into public domain?
Exactly, there's no reason talks can't take place. Then if and when it gets to a stage that things are ready to really start moving forward thats the point for dropping legal action.
Just saying we're not even talking to you unless you drop all action is foolish and shows continued refusal to help the club on the part of CCC.
So if that was the case why would they leave it to CRFC to initially bring this into public domain?
True. But then who is paying for this 15-20k expansion and what is our role? Tenants again?
Weird isn't it? Many posters have said the same thing over and over again. It wasn't SISU or the Club who said anything, it was CRFC. We would never have known if they hadn't released details.
I would think some kind of joint ownership with a new management company, so both clubs get revenue and the deck is loaded for one player like it is at the Ricoh.
Funding for the project would be provided by forming a joint property company with the football club and ongoing revenue would be secured by the two organisations forming an events company to handle the day to day running of the stadium.
I would think some kind of joint ownership with a new management company, so both clubs get revenue and the deck is loaded for one player like it is at the Ricoh.
Yes but doesn't sound that way torch. Sounds like sub letting to me. Remember sisu aren't going to pay a penny towards moving so it seems to me tenants again. Even that Sharp bloke said as much.
I would think some kind of joint ownership with a new management company, so both clubs get revenue and the deck isn't loaded for one player like it is at the Ricoh.
Still eagerly awaiting that statement from the Trust.
Sure there was something like that but they don't seem too hot on sticking to their own rules. Reckon if there was solid evidence something was happening they'd happily add a few years on.wasn't there a deadline from the Football League (when we were first got permission to go to Northampton) in which to establish a "permanent" base? 8 years seems to stick in the memory.
So that's italia brilliant plan, stop all legal action and give wasps more money. We'll be in the Champions League before you know it
How can somebody write so much but say so littleNo but nor have our owners as I say both as bad as eachother Ian. Both looking after themselves and this is where we are left.
Personally I think this is all a bargaining chip to staying at the Ricoh. as I said above in the next year or two something has to happen as our rent deal concludes at the Ricoh. We can't move again surely?
..... or your plan which is to support them in aimlessly 'battering' everybody and just talk about a stadium but never ever get there.
It's never going to happen for reasons everybody knows already. Location, parking, residents and cost.
Add in we aspire to be a PL club then it's fails on so many counts.
We all agree that we should own the Ricoh but leaving it should not be at any cost.
We need to buy into the Ricoh until we have a better plan.
We need to give Wasps an incentive that when we get to the Championship/PL they will benefit.
We need to get as much access to incomes as possible, but we need these stupid legals out the way first.
Of course unless anyone thinks the Ricoh is being knocked down we could always play a game there should we get a big cup time and there be the demand.
Yes it would, we would be full and those that can't get a ticket, tough luck.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
We have plans to downgrade to 15kStoke, Norwich, West Brom all have plans to expand. Swansea's stadium has the ability to expand to 40,000.
Had a bit of a play around in photoshop putting some other stadiums into the space available. If the small park could be purchased and a few design tricks you could get a 30K plus stadium in.
Don't think that's on the cards at all but if things start to move forward on this it might be worth looking into.
This type of post is usually when someone is struggling a bit with their point.Why do you always post these "off the scale" replies?
I would think some kind of joint ownership with a new management company, so both clubs get revenue and the deck isn't loaded for one player like it is at the Ricoh.
Not my plan at all, my preferred option is to do whatever is best for the club longterm. You dismiss anything that doesn't involve handing money over to Wasps.
The chap from CRFC was denying things after the LR exklusive. Pinch of salt..The chap from CRFC has already confirmed that.
So that's italia brilliant plan, stop all legal action and give wasps more money. We'll be in the Champions League before you know it
Well the council show themselves up to be utter cunts again. What a fucking surprise.
Sent from my HTC One_M8 using Tapatalk
The one you kept mocking?The chap from CRFC was denying things after the LR exklusive. Pinch of salt..
It could take years to get to a deal and during that time you cannot sit opposite your court opponent and have a neutral conversation. The legal action must go first. Ok, get some form of "treaty" before dropping the JR and all future stadium connected litigation.Exactly. Get to the negotiation table, but make it clear that the legal action goes when a deal is done.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?