Callum Wilson ready to sign new deal with Coventry City (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter bluesky88
- Start date
No it's just common sense signing new contracts to the best players at the club when they have one year left. And scored 9 goals in 9 games
I'd rather we tied down the likes of CW & co, as what's the guarantee Messi would be a hit for the club
For every Terry Gibo, there's a Bellemy!
I do think SP is talking bull about loans not improving the team, would Ronaldo not improve CCFC?
i'm sure if ronaldo was offered, he'd take him. I agree with you though, Watford proved that loans can work and they went to the extreme. But i'm only for bringing in loans if they give us something we don't have and improve the team/squad. If not, whats the point? I'd rather he developed young players.
I'd rather we tied down the likes of CW & co, as what's the guarantee Messi would be a hit for the club
For every Terry Gibo, there's a Bellemy!
I do think SP is talking bull about loans not improving the team, would Ronaldo not improve CCFC?
He's bit talking Bull fella he is just being realistic
yeah but hes stated he wants to stay and buy house in cov etc so be very surprising if did, whereas before it wouldn't have been surprising in the slightest
according to a relation of his - he loves coventry and reallw ants to play for them
He did proviso this with "but money talks"
you could be really happy in your job - earning £20k a year
but if somebody offered you another and you would be just making the tea , but for £100k a year, you would take it
He did proviso this with "but money talks"
you could be really happy in your job - earning £20k a year
but if somebody offered you another and you would be just making the tea , but for £100k a year, you would take it
To be honest there is a pretty direct quote from Callum in the article.... I dare say that is this form continues somebody will buy him, but for now I think he buys into Pressley and what he is trying to acheive.
Good deal for city if approved.
FFP is ultimately irrelevant as sisu have the option of putting money into the club as long as it isn't a loan (which they have done with every single penny so far).
FFP is ultimately irrelevant as sisu have the option of putting money into the club as long as it isn't a loan (which they have done with every single penny so far).
You could be right.
Think people are confusing Uefa's FFP which were brought in for the top leagues, mainly because teams from those leagues play on Uefa competitions, with the football league adopted FFP rules.
