philmcc
Member
Just a quick genuine question and sorry if this is old ground, I have read a number of threads but not all so it may have passed me by.... would just like to know if ACL/PWKH/CCC have ever refuted Tim Fisher's repeated claims that groundshare is the only option, as there is no deal on the table for Holdings to play at the Ricoh?
I understand that both parties are blaming each other for breaking off negotiations, going back on deals and all the rights and wrongs etc. I would just like to know if its true that ACL are only prepared to let Limited play at the Ricoh, and that same offer has not been extended to Holdings ..? *
I understand that both parties are blaming each other for breaking off negotiations, going back on deals and all the rights and wrongs etc. I would just like to know if its true that ACL are only prepared to let Limited play at the Ricoh, and that same offer has not been extended to Holdings ..? *