And why would PH4 and Byng be interested, you think?
And why would PH4 and Byng be interested, you think?
You may have a point but I can't see how any other owner could actually do anymore damage to a club than what has happened unnecessarily to CCFC ! It appears a good number of independent media sports writers take this view as well.
For the same reason. The Ricoh makes money. This to me makes it difficult to get the arena on the cheap. There will be others interested in something that makes money and that is making more each year. The council would have to listen to all offers. Maybe this is why Timothy has started to say about long term rental chances after saying as owners only. An average valuation is about 17 times profit. Can be a bit more but also much less, but this depends on the stability of the investment.
Maybe PH4 but Byng no, they (Byng and his investors) only wanted the the Arena and the land around it for the rail network.
Fantastic to see a local business doing so well.
Well done acl for putting the arena on the map. A great local asset for us Coventry folk.
I don't have any reason to trust any of them. But I have a reason to trust the plans of some less than others. This is why I have always said I am not against a sale for a proper price if it is sold. But the most secure owner is the local council. There is much more of a chance of them wanting what is best for our club and Coventry itself than anyone else. And ACL seems to be doing a decent job of running it so far.
Now if we could just get something to stick on that green bit in the middle we'd really dancing in the aisles.
Now if we could just get something to stick on that green rectangular bit in the middle we'd be really dancing in the aisles.
And why would PH4 and Byng be interested, you think?
In 2014 we are focused on attracting sport to the stadium bowl"
Well this is what sisu have gambled with. They believed that if they leave ACL will die without them.
ACL appear strong, and if they can attract more sporting events to the bowl then it will be curtains to CCFC.
It was always naïve to expect ACL to just sit around waiting.
Fair comment but what sporting team is there that can utilise the Arena? The Rugga doesn't pull big enough crowds..
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Well I did say if.
I imagine by that they mean using it as a neutral venue like they have for Rugby games before.
I saw that however until they have someone in it there is no point really saying much about it.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
In a logical world ACL would buy CCFC.
Where's 'RFC' to tell us why the Ricoh's a dead duck without CCFC?
Whilst I am really glad that the Ricoh is expanding its off the field activities, we will have to wait for the financial report on how well or badly they are doing. I really hope the Ricoh can make a profit without a sports franchise, but from an article recently in the Guardian about the Brazil World Cup it was mentioned that there was not a stadium in the world that could exist without a sports franchise. I agree SISUs plan is absolute pants but I dont think they will directly pay for any stadium.Yet some try and make out that the venue makes a loss and is a noose around the neck of the taxpayer.
We all know it isn't about the pie money. A 20m stadium which would just be a football bowl placed wherever they can fit it won't have the same income as the Ricoh. It is also something that is built up in time. Yet a few seem to think that all income would go to our club if SISUE did manage to get the Ricoh. They just seem to see our club as a means to get the stadium. How many times have we seen them do what is best for our club?