At least we can now concentrate on the league and avoiding relegation.
Sad game when it is probably the only time this season CCFC will have a world wide televised audience.
There is also the FA Cup and JPT. Even the pundits were laughing at us this evening...
Can't see us winning going for 2-1 Cardiff
Excellent video shame you never videoed the home fans joining in Oh yes only a hand full at the front joined in fuckin disgrace.[video=youtube;2tMUszmCITY]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2tMUszmCITY[/video]
Jesus Christ !!! You've studied the game and you'd actually start with McQuoid what did you study fucking champ manager he's bloody awful and at best will manage ten goals. Won't disagree with the formation though and dropping Webster (not hid my feelings on him), calling a formation change ain't hard after what we've seen.
He's played twice, thought he showed a couple of nice touches when he actually got the ball
Went up the hill tonight as I walked up to the ground I saw a sorry state of a ground.
Couldn't stop laughing that some would actually pay to go into that place.
Spoke to Nigel tonight he was phoned up by Fisher and offered 2 Free tickets to the game.
Fair play to him told them to F Off and came on the hill.
Cracking atmosphere from the hill tonight never stopped for the whole game.
All 156 off us all ages many virgins to the hill well done to you all and well done to the Cardiff fans for joining in the protests. shame more of our own didn't care enough to join in from inside.
Oh and as for the game the less said the better on to forget me thinks.......
Excellent video shame you never videoed the home fans joining in Oh yes only a hand full at the front joined in fuckin disgrace.
There were City fans near the Cardiff fans who sang all night and protested and actually started the Cardiff protest just for what it's worth.
There were City fans near the Cardiff fans who sang all night and protested and actually started the Cardiff protest just for what it's worth.
[video=youtube;2tMUszmCITY]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2tMUszmCITY[/video]
He put more than one decent cross in.
Lolling at the fact Ryan Haynes puts one decent ball in and some of you think he's worthy of a starting spot ahead of Pugh
Lolling? Is that a new word? What does it mean? Please explain.
Ahahaha I'm 20 tbf, and I actually think playing FIFA is ruining a generation of football fans as it gives them a warped understanding of the game. Good stereotype to throw out though
To be fair, the stereotype of the 20 year old who thinks he knows everything is a much better one
True, let his marker get the better of him and consequently scored an own goal.
How appropriate that after that crap, the first advert on Sky us beleaguered City fans see if one for erectile dysfunction.
These crafty marketeers know their demographic.....
Hmm. Before you start lolling, you might just want to take a look at that goal again.
That OG was actually the result of an error on the other side of the pitch. High ball up the line, which our right-back/wing-back misjudges, gets caught under and flicks on. The whole defence is now turned and running back towards goal, full pace, whilst their left mid has time to run on unchallenged and then drill one across the six yard box. Haynes is actually in a pretty decent position at this point; the correct side of the attacker with relation to the cross, and touch tight - but because he's running back full tilt it's going to be hard to do anything except push it towards goal. I'd still rather he tried, because at least he's trying to disrupt, whilst the attacker on his shoulder is trying to score.
Most people who've played and/or watched the game know how dangerous that ball is, and how difficult it is to defend. That's why you try not to get caught having to defend them. Far better defenders than Haynes would have done the same thing, or worse, been on their heels and five yards behind the attacker watching him knock it in. If you're pulling his performance apart based on that OG then politely, I don't think you've got your analysis quite right.
Wasn't pulling his performance apart at all, just bemused at people calling for him to play ahead of Pugh
From what I saw last night, I'm not surprised. We had more creativity from the left when Haynes was there. I've no problem with Pugh fwiw, but on the evidence of last night, and assuming SP sticks with the same formation, I'd say that Haynes offered more. All mho, as ever.
To be fair though duffer, the whole team played poor and were on the back foot for the first 70 minutes, had Haynes started and Pugh came on for the last 30 mins we would probably be saying the same about Pugh. Haynes played well, but he also played during the 15-20 mins when we as a team actually played quite well and had 2 strikers on the pitch.
Yep, take your point - you could also say he's playing against players who were more tired. However, as I saw it he did little wrong, and offered more than Pugh. Accepted, it could well be that if the roles were reversed we'd be talking about Pugh taking Haynes place in the starting line up. Into the balance though, if you were being really harsh on him, would be the fact that Bradford's goal on Saturday came from a cross from Pugh's side (iirc).
It's one for the manager really, it could be that Haynes is better as an impact sub. But I think the one thing I didn't agree with is the suggestion that replacing Pugh with Haynes is somehow laughable - to me it's a pretty tight call.
Danny Pugh - Hundreds of games for Preston, Stoke and Leeds at a higher level
Ryan Haynes - Looks like a ghost
Yeah, pretty tight tbh
Danny Pugh - Hundreds of games for Preston, Stoke and Leeds at a higher level
Ryan Haynes - Looks like a ghost
Yeah, pretty tight tbh
Now that's risible (posh word for LOL).
I thought you knew something about football. What does looking a bit pale have to do with it. Or the hundreds of appearances for Pugh. What matters is what he's doing now, which is made two appearances on a losing team. If you're saying something is laughable, on the pretence on a better understanding, then back it up mate. For all of the facts and figures I wonder if you actually bother to watch what goes on in a game.
For me it is laughable, for starters the reason we've lost both games isn't down to who's playing at left wing back. It's due to the formation as I've previously said....
...I'm not all about facts and figures, I have a decent understanding of the game. I watch and give my opinion
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?