Cargill and Stephens to both play on Sunday perhaps? (1 Viewer)

Otis · Feb 2, 2016

Just checked and Stephens can play defensive midfield as well as, as a defender. With Vincelot suspended, could TM maybe play him there?

Then Cargill can take Ramage's place alongside Ricketts. Just can't see Ricketts being dropped as he is the captain. I thought Lorentzson looked pretty good at right back too, though obviously ring rusty.

So for Port Vale, the back line and defensive midfield could look like this .....

RCC

Lorentzson Cargill Ricketts Stokes

Fleck Stephens.

matesx · Feb 2, 2016

Martin could be in contention too

AFCCOVENTRY · Feb 2, 2016

Possibly. Looks quite good on paper.

With the 6 loan signings Bigi surely will be dropped.

matesx · Feb 2, 2016

tough game this

WestEndAgro · Feb 2, 2016

matesx said:
tough game this

They are all tough, it's virtualy impossible to pick a result in this league.

skybluepm2 · Feb 2, 2016

matesx said:
tough game this

It sure is. They've only lost once at home all season which surprised me. Pressure from the teams below us will only increase. We need to stop the rot by gaining at least a point but I'm not too hopeful given our current form and lack of confidence.

ClarkeZ · Feb 2, 2016

Otis said:
So for Port Vale, the back line and defensive midfield could look like this .....

RCC

Lorentzson Cargill Ricketts Stokes

Fleck Stephens.

Tough game, Port Vale only lost one at home all season I think? I would take a point before the game if offered it.

Possibly too soon to change too many starting faces? Drop Bigi immediately, maybe start JOB alongside Fleck. Good energy, teams don't often like playing against them, he causes issues and he's a serious engine for the team. Back 4 looks much more solid though, just hope Cargill will calm Rickett's nerves a little so hes less chaotic.

Captain Dart · Feb 2, 2016

Otis said:
Just checked and Stephens can play defensive midfield as well as, as a defender. With Vincelot suspended, could TM maybe play him there?

There are lots of options with so many midfielders available even without Vincelot (a player like that is bound to take a few suspensions).

Hunt, Fleck, Cole (maybe), Lamerias, Murphy, Bigi, Rose, JOB, Maddison, only 2 loans.

fernandopartridge · Feb 2, 2016

Same starting 11 as Saturday apart from:

Fleck for Bigi
Rose for Vincelot
Cole for Maddison
JOB for Hunt
Cargill for Ramage

Dimi_Konstantflapalot · Feb 2, 2016

RCC

Lorentszon – Ricketts – Cargill – Stokes

Fleck – Rose

JOB – Maddison – Lameiras

Armstrong

Hobo · Feb 2, 2016

fernandopartridge said:
Same starting 11 as Saturday apart from:

Fleck for Bigi
Rose for Vincelot
Cole for Maddison
JOB for Hunt
Cargill for Ramage

Thank God for that same 11 with only 5 changes this week.

stupot07 · Feb 2, 2016

fernandopartridge said:
Same starting 11 as Saturday apart from:

Fleck for Bigi
Rose for Vincelot
Cole for Maddison
JOB for Hunt
Cargill for Ramage

Agree apart from Stephens instead of cargill.

Fergusons_Beard · Feb 2, 2016

js_lilley said:
Possibly too soon to change too many starting faces? Drop Bigi immediately, maybe start JOB alongside Fleck. Good energy, teams don't often like playing against them, he causes issues and he's a serious engine for the team.

Can't play JOB centre-he's not disciplined enough. TM can't rely on him to play right sided midfield-too many times he goes a-wandering & affects the shape of our team-leaving wide open spaces and encouraging the counter attack.

In went in off Ferguson's beard....

Otis · Feb 2, 2016

Fergusons_Beard said:
Can't play JOB centre-he's not disciplined enough. TM can't rely on him to play right sided midfield-too many times he goes a-wandering & affects the shape of our team-leaving wide open spaces and encouraging the counter attack.

In went in off Ferguson's beard....

Agree. JOB would be all over the place in that clearly defined, disciplined role.

That's why I said Stephens. He has played there and is comfortable with both feet I would presume, as he started off as a right back, but was then converted to left back and can play anywhere across the back line and also at DM.

Would think he is the obvious choice.

When Rose came on he played much higher up the pitch.

covcity4life · Feb 2, 2016

think i would play rose with fleck in middle

maybe go with cargil and stephens at back from off although prob makes more sense to reunite stephens and ricketts with stokes and lorentsken as fullbacks

nice to have some options at back!

fernandopartridge · Feb 2, 2016

Hobo said:
Thank God for that same 11 with only 5 changes this week.

I did think that but it was easier than typing out the whole team

Skyblueweeman · Feb 2, 2016

Although Maddison has signed for Norwich, will the deal start from the summer? If not, I assume we now need to include him in the 'loans' numbers??

Anyone know?

Nantwich Skyblues · Feb 2, 2016

Stephens is further on than cargill in his development , he was excellent at swindon and should be a shoe in for the weekend at CB

covcity4life · Feb 2, 2016

rcc
stokes
stephens
ricketts
lorentzken
rose
fleck
cole
murphy
job
armstrong

standupforcity · Feb 2, 2016

Think we need to leave JM out as much as poss...to get used to not having him as an option, to develop winning ways again without him...and to give Lameiras the break he so deserves!

stupot07 · Feb 2, 2016

Skyblueweeman said:
Although Maddison has signed for Norwich, will the deal start from the summer? If not, I assume we now need to include him in the 'loans' numbers??

Anyone know?

He is a Norwich player and now on loan.

Otis · Feb 2, 2016

standupforcity said:
Think we need to leave JM out as much as poss...to get used to not having him as an option, to develop winning ways again without him...and to give Lameiras the break he so deserves!

Why leave him out as much as possible? Why would you do that? You play your best team surely and pick the team that can win you the game.

We can't think about not having him next season, we have to think in terms of how he can help us get promotion THIS season.

If he can do a job and he's professional enough to be up for it, you pick him.

I would maybe just leave him on the bench for Sunday though. Maybe let it all sink in for him, but after that I would very much expect him to be a vital part of our match day squad.

ajsccfc · Feb 2, 2016

Surely if you're leaving Maddison out in order to get used to playing without him, for similar reasons you'd need to be benching Armstrong and Murphy for Tudgay and Fortune.

Otis · Feb 2, 2016

Yep.

All the loans we've brought in, let's leave them out!

Sent from my Hudl 2 using Tapatalk

stupot07 · Feb 2, 2016

ajsccfc said:
Surely if you're leaving Maddison out in order to get used to playing without him, for similar reasons you'd need to be benching Armstrong and Murphy for Tudgay and Fortune.

That wouldn't work, they won't be here next season either

ajsccfc · Feb 2, 2016

Let's hope that's not true. I predict multi-year extensions for both, with a ticker tape parade to greet the news.

Earlsdon_Skyblue1 · Feb 2, 2016

Either way Murphy needs to be dropped so he can evaluate his attitude. I'd go with:

Burge

Lorentzon Ricketts Cargill/Stephens Stokes

Fleck

Rose JOB
Maddison Ruben

Armstrong

Ccfcisparks · Feb 2, 2016

for me saturday its
RCC
Lorentzson Ricketts Stephens Stokes
Fleck Rose
Murphy Cole Job
Arma

Personally i feel what Maddison contributes on a match day is overrated, he constantly slows down counter attacks which is what we thrived on start of the season.

rupert_bear · Feb 2, 2016

Suddenly seems lots of options how about a back 4 of Ricketts, Stephens Cargill Stokes and a midfield five with Lorentzen out wide right Rose, Cole, Fleck Hunt or Murphy, then there's Maddison and Lamieras JOB on the bench with AA up front. That squad should beat any team in our league IF we get the tactics right

Otis · Feb 2, 2016

Ccfcisparks said:
for me saturday its
RCC
Lorentzson Ricketts Stephens Stokes
Fleck Rose
Murphy Cole Job
Arma

Personally i feel what Maddison contributes on a match day is overrated, he constantly slows down counter attacks which is what we thrived on start of the season.

That's the team for Saturday, but what line-up are you going to then choose for Sunday you reckon?

Gazolba · Feb 2, 2016

js_lilley said:
Tough game, Port Vale only lost one at home all season I think?

We hadn't lost any until recently, now we've lost two, so they can be upset. We need three points, but I'd settle for one. We must not lose though.

No Way Back · Feb 2, 2016

Be so nice to get a few goals after such a miserable January. If they can keep Arma quiet we'll be in for a tough afternoon.

StevieM · Feb 2, 2016

There is always the option of three at the back, we have several players who could fit in that configuration?

shmmeee · Feb 2, 2016

To be honest, I'd pick Cole over Maddison all things being equal, and as we won't benefit from any game time he gets any more, the incentive to play him is less. Also, if you leave Bigi out we have no-one on the bench for 2 midfield positions.

RCC
Lorentzson Ricketts Cargil Stokes
Rose Fleck
JOB Cole Murphy
Arma

S: Burge, Stevens, Haynes, Bigi, Lameiras, Hunt, Tudgay/Sambou (is Tudgay fit?)

Nantwich Skyblues · Feb 2, 2016

shmmeee said:
To be honest, I'd pick Cole over Maddison all things being equal, and as we won't benefit from any game time he gets any more, the incentive to play him is less. Also, if you leave Bigi out we have no-one on the bench for 2 midfield positions.

RCC
Lorentzson Ricketts Cargil Stokes
Rose Fleck
JOB Cole Murphy
Arma

S: Burge, Stevens, Haynes, Bigi, Lameiras, Hunt, Tudgay/Sambou (is Tudgay fit?)

Stephens needs to play as center back and will.. mowbray really rates him

Cargill and Stephens to both play on Sunday perhaps? (1 Viewer)

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

New Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Users who are viewing this thread

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency