CBS issues (40 Viewers)

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Will the club really receive an EFL sanction though? Or is that just yet another stick for Boddy to use to publicly beat Wasps with and conjure more vitriol towards them?

Well whether it actually happens or not it's a possibility, even a slim one. I'm just not convinced it's 4-D chess being played by Boddy and that he was delighted at losing out on the revenue.
 

KenilworthSkyBlue

Well-Known Member
Well whether it actually happens or not it's a possibility, even a slim one. I'm just not convinced it's 4-D chess being played by Boddy and that he was delighted at losing out on the revenue.

It's obviously not 4-D chess.

That being said there's clearly something going on, as the narrative coming out of the club raises far too many questions to be taken seriously.
 

oldfiver

Well-Known Member
probably - they’ll no doubt get some funding for a court battle

How barmy is that?

They will not get the ST money until the game is played. The walk up money is going to be lost in the main

Not to mention the immediate £30k>£40k to play tomorrow in Burton
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
It's obviously not 4-D chess.

That being said there's clearly something going on, as the narrative coming out of the club raises far too many questions to be taken seriously.

Well there is, they're sniffing blood about Wasps going under and/or the stadium coming up for grabs. But that doesn't detract from us being desperately short of cash ourselves and on the balance of probability preferring to have played on Sunday.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
How barmy is that?

They will not get the ST money until the game is played. The walk up money is going to be lost in the main

Not to mention the immediate £30k>£40k to play tomorrow in Burton

wasn’t there significant investment funding when the club went to sixfields?
 

Skybluebeliever

Well-Known Member
Will the club really receive an EFL sanction though? Or is that just yet another stick for Boddy to use to publicly beat Wasps with and conjure more vitriol towards them?
IF the EFL said we can’t play games away from home and we asked them, it seems it will be hard to get a sanction , as we put a solution in place in case this happens
 

oldfiver

Well-Known Member
Well there is, they're sniffing blood about Wasps going under and/or the stadium coming up for grabs. But that doesn't detract from us being desperately short of cash ourselves and on the balance of probability preferring to have played on Sunday.

Unless the proposed WMAC grant moves to any new owners why would anyone want the stadium

£20m of dilaps?
 

MalcSB

Well-Known Member
We’re either incredibly naive, someone massively cocked up or there is something we’re not being told.

Everyone and their dogs (except for Anthony Hornsby) could have told you that pitch was wrecked by the CWG, and unless there was a secret pitch relaying in the middle of the night it was going to start like that for the Rotherham game. If no-one at the club realised that then it’s on them.
And what could they have done about it?
 

MalcSB

Well-Known Member
You shouldn't have to, and as for the contract situation if you're renting the Arena for the purpose of playing football matches it's surely an implied term that the venue will be of a standard that will allow that to happen. It's literally not fit for purpose.

As for what that means though in terms of reparations is another thing. The contract may well be voidable, but the club aren't going to want to do that, but If there's no specific clause included regarding compensation I don't know what you can do other than set in motion yet another court case demanding loss of earnings and/or recouping costs incurred.

From the sounds of it I doubt we can make a claim about having a new pitch as it comes across that was more a gentleman's agreement than contractual, but the pitch not passing an inspection is an avenue that is definitely open.
It will be more than an implied term, it is an EFL requirement.
 

KenilworthSkyBlue

Well-Known Member
Well there is, they're sniffing blood about Wasps going under and/or the stadium coming up for grabs. But that doesn't detract from us being desperately short of cash ourselves and on the balance of probability preferring to have played on Sunday.

Indeed, and that poses two questions.

What is the club's strategy to bridge the shortfall over the next month?

And if SISU/the club do smell blood, what lengths are they willing to go to in order to apply further pressure?
 

oldfiver

Well-Known Member
I think the general upkeep piece

The lack of communication on this shows Wasps have no immediate solution and probably have bigger concerns , than making sure football can be played on the pitch

In short they are not interested in CCFC problems nor willing to spend time or money on them
 

MusicDating

Euro 2016 Prediction League Champion!!
If the ten year lease does have something in there about pitch maintenance, then I'm fully prepared to accept that SISU just sat back waiting for this to explode rather than assisting getting the pitch ready.
 

MusicDating

Euro 2016 Prediction League Champion!!
And by the same token, if there's nothing in the lease, I'm fully prepared to accept that it's SISU's incompetence that meant we haven't checked on the pitch!
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
I'm sorry and it is painful to say this, but for an impartial observer the club relying on a statement about relaying the pitch made some time ago in lieu of having a day to day relationship is just ridiculous

Our person delivering messages is just a lot more believed but it’s all the same
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
WASPs said they would spend £100k on pitch - so far £7k. That's a lot of sand - which is useless

as I’ve said Vaughan and Eastwood are from the same smarm school and show the same levels of honesty as your pal fisher
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Are you saying my comment is not true?
Careful G !

No I’m saying it’s entirely true what’s odd is you don’t see the same nonsense Vaughan spouts is exactly the same as fisher has done for years and years. It’s on public record fishers quotes regarding new stadiums for a decade and it’s no more truthful than his comment, actually less as at least he spent some money on sand. Fisher didn’t even go through a charade of buying any land.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top