Exactly.Bradford got 1,360, their last home game was 15,935 and one before was 18,205.
I think it says more about the competition
Why have we been singled out in this?
because the club is sinking fast, crowds are even for the league are falling and, well, it's a new low. If you read the piece its more bad publicity for sisu.Why have we been singled out in this?
Because the BBC will do anything to put the boot into the club. It's a conspiracy I tell you. Right Nick
Why have we been singled out in this?
Because they are highlighting how pathetic a once great club has become. When you are bottom of stats you are a fact and not singled out.
Middlesborough got 308 for one of their games. think they will be bottom of the stats.
No the stats of a broader plane....we are bottom believe me.
I know you won't accept it but I'm pointing out this is an issue with the competition and not just down to our owners.
We're not bottom of attendances either in L1 or the EFL Trophy.When you are bottom of stats you are a fact and not singled out.
We're not bottom of attendances either in L1 or the EFL Trophy.
Portsmouth would have been a much better example. 17K against Doncaster in L2 then a few days later their lowest ever crowd, 1,355. Or maybe Swindon v Oxford, 9,013 in the JPT last year, 2,698 this year - the lowest ever for that fixture.
Usual trick then? Throw something out and get corrected. Then throw the sisu lover line.Hang on in there Chief...Hang on in there......
You are like the Brown suited accountant in the boardroom who hasn't grasped the ship is going down.
Hang on in there Chief...Hang on in there......
You are like the Brown suited accountant in the boardroom who hasn't grasped the ship is going down.
And has backed it up with facts, what a bastard.No, he just doesn't happen to agree with everything you say.
Usual trick then? Throw something out and get corrected. Then throw the sisu lover line.
I think your facts are probably better suited aren't they?Where have I said SISU lover, with spin like that Nick you should work at the Telegraph.
I think your facts are probably better suited aren't they?
Your reply about the accountant, that's what it insinuates. All he did was give you examples of bigger attendance drops.
All I have pointed out is where we are as a club....that won't be going to Wembley even in this Mickey Mouse cup. The task is and it is an all hands to the pump task, is to avoid relegation. Never quite understand why you are so twitchy and defensive Nick when it comes to the fact our owners are absolutely shocking. They have taken us back to before the Sky Blue era. You do support the Sky Blues don't you? I have never heard you spouting about the Bantams!
The discussion was about check a trade attendances wasn't it? It was also pointed out others have seen much bigger drops than we did.
Why is it twitchy to point something out that seems to have been missed?
Not saying I don't think the ship is sinking, just not sure why we've been singled out.Hang on in there Chief...Hang on in there......
You are like the Brown suited accountant in the boardroom who hasn't grasped the ship is going down.
It's both without doubtI know you won't accept it but I'm pointing out this is an issue with the competition and not just down to our owners.
If that really is true then Stu I'd like to know why the team budget is 400k less now.Whilst no one can dispute attendance s are falling (albeit the current league averge is only marginally smaller then 2 years ago, so it may be we are plateauing out) but this weeks attendance says more about the competition than it does about our general attendance. Attendances across thr competition are well down, bringing in the u23 teams has completely devalued an already poor competition which didn't really draw in fans.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
My guess is, costs are still high and they are still making a loss and have not quite managed to cut the wage bill quick enough, IIRC the entire wage bill has been more than 100% for at least 3 of the 5 years we've been in league one before you consider the other costs. If they want to run breakeven then that means squeezing more costs, regardless of whether your income/turnover is the same. They also got their forecasting wrong last season so they may have also reduced costs to reflect that too.It's both without doubt
If that really is true then Stu I'd like to know why the team budget is now 400k less now.
Not withstanding there's scope to go higher or lower crowdwise both this and next season.
Last night's attendance was the lowest at the Ricoh for a first team game. The lowest ever was not at Northampton but at Highfield Road. It was a Full Members' Cup game against Millwall in 1985 when neither team could qualify for the next round. The attendance that night was just 1086. I was one of them, there was only the main stand open and I'm sure it was a lower crowd than we used to get for reserve games.
The discussion was about check a trade attendances wasn't it? It was also pointed out others have seen much bigger drops than we did.
Why is it twitchy to point something out that seems to have been missed?
Based on the check a trade attendance?It's an article about the decline of CCFC, why would they mention other clubs?