But hey wouldn't be able to purchase 100% of the stadium until they got into the prem :thinking about: 50% yes, but whilst we linger in L1, they would take a long, long time to make a return in profit.
I dont understand why TF chooses to conduct the PR he does, if anything he seems to be losing the bit of belief the fans had. He seems to be doing ACL's PR for them. The more he says the less the fans believe what he says.
If it hadnt been for the appointment of MR and how he has galvanised the team then CCFC could possibly have been in a short but terminal decline ............... fans voting with their feet, and the life blood of the club cut off.
Question - if SISU got hold of the stadium how long do you think they would actually continue funding CCFC ?
just as a clue i repeat what i put earlier The only driving forces of a hedge fund is money and a return on their investment in the shortest time possible then move to the next hit - we would do well to remember that A loss making club would only decrease that return...... and i dont think SISU are willing to fund a drive to the premiership, the odds are not good of achieving that with too many variables - Hedge funds do not take those kind of gambles, yes they do gamble but it is very calculated with a good chance of success. Football just isnt that sure an outcome
just my opinion
Once they have their investors & loans repaid and their fee for doing it then it is not inconceivable that they wind up the SBS&L Group. Not good news for CCFC at all SISU owning the lease
15 pages so far debating the biggest load of horse shit the Telegraph have ever printed. Only 85 to catch up with the 'continually amazed at what Portsmouth get up to' thread.
I just cant believe that the Telegraph print anything that this idiot Fisher says, and he clearly is an imbecile of the highest order. If the club moved to Nene Park we would be financially doomed in a matter of months so its a no go for SISU to get their filthy mits on the 30 million they need to recoup.
It just makes me so angry though for this complete tool to put the fans through it. I agree we cant afford the current rent but for the sake of everyone he needs to start being the buisnessman he purports to be and sort out a deal, rather than acting like the unproffessional clown that he is coming accross as.
How will they purchase the lease, they are potless?Why would they wind up a company once they'd covered all loans and fee's? Surely a sell on would be more profitable ...
The long lease is probably also much more worth with a viable football club as tenant.
Would be dependent on how long it takes to get a sale Godiva.:thinking about:
Why would they wind up a company once they'd covered all loans and fee's? Surely a sell on would be more profitable ... club has no value though
The long lease is probably also much more worth with a viablethat would be profit making without big debts to parent company wouldnt it football club as tenant.
Who's saying they're trying to Buy it.
Do you think they have a cat in hells chance after this Debacle.
The process is to Knock it over and gain for peanuts ,whats not to get.
Yes with a viable club it would be worth more but if it still made losses what would you do if your belief was money was king and had no passion for the club, but had a charge over its assets...... maybe keep it going to sell the lease interest then say "it doesnt work we have to shut it down" ? Ok then could sell the assets on but that isnt going to raise much. These people have no compunction about maximising the return then chopping anything that brings that down. I didnt say they would i said they could, maybe they would sell the club but who would buy it with the debts we have?
The club should increase ticket prices by £4 for non season ticket holders and away fans, that would bring in the additional £200k in the remaining 12-13 home games.
That way the council and Higgs don't get shafted and TF gets the level of rent he wants. Everyone's a winner.
thats why i put the original post as i did BSB though. They get hold of ACL in SBS&L not in CCFC. That means that any loans in SBS&L get paid but the debts in CCFC remain where they are. The club effectively still owe SBS&L 10's of millions but the SISU investors loans will have been repaid largely if not totally
Who's saying they're trying to Buy it.
Do you think they have a cat in hells chance after this Debacle.
The process is to Knock it over and gain for peanuts ,whats not to get.
Just about the most sensible summary of this pathetically insulting situation, contrived by the sisu clowns.
For a start....
1. They are disagreeing over a difference of rent , somewhere in the region of £100k per year (approx)........so how much would it cost to 'move' to Nene park.....? A damn sight more
2. If they can fill the ground, with season ticket holders plus a few more, they lose out on approx 4000 * £15 = £60k per home match
3. Half the season ticket holders demand a refund = 2500* 0.5**£300 =£375k
Total no brainer, pathetic posturing by fisher, and I for one am totally insulted that he thinks we, as CCFC fans, can't see this.
Yes with a viable club it would be worth more but if it still made losses what would you do if your belief was money was king and had no passion for the club, but had a charge over its assets...... maybe keep it going to sell the lease interest then say "it doesnt work we have to shut it down" ? Ok then could sell the assets on but that isnt going to raise much. These people have no compunction about maximising the return then chopping anything that brings that down. I didnt say they would i said they could, maybe they would sell the club but who would buy it with the debts we have?
Funny how people are calling TF an imbecile etc. but realistically it isn't a viable option, anyway, there are better options locally (Nuneaton). This is a scare tactic, and for people to take it in and treatit with such seriousness, they are the imbeciles.
We aren't moving out of the RICOH.
Wouldn't even need to do that-also included in the £400k was full access to matchday revenue, which over a year would contribute a fair bit (six figures) in itself.
The deal offered is decent tbf, I'll admit that, but at the time we got offered 50% the majority said we should've took it*, 4-5 months later they offer 67%, more uproar... If the trend continues we could get a deal that suits CCFC, don't we all want the best deal for CCFC?
Serious question - if the renegade tactics work, and we get 300k, 300k backdated to 8months ago and 100% match day revenue (this is an example). Would you rather, with hindsight, take the current deal, or the new improved deal?
*at this point I said no, don't take, they'll reduce it even more, which they have, and I'm going to predict they'll reduce it even more.
I'd rather we not have to resort to all the pathetic and unprofessional tactics TF has seen fit to employ.
It which case it's a pretty poor scare tactic.
Nene Park = 6500 capacity
Bedworth Oval = highest attendance in non league 5127
May as well go up the road
We won't be moving there. It's posturing and a bargaining tool.
Haven't time to look up the rest
But I assure you said those comments.
I know this was about Nene, but this was your stance regarding us moving at all.
wtf, have we gone back in time.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?