Chris Anderson (1 Viewer)

Liquid Gold · Sep 18, 2016

Does nobody get the impression that London Wasps want the legals dropped because they fear something? If not why would they give a shit.

skybluetony176 · Sep 18, 2016

Deleted member 5849 said:
Alexander Stadium.

Can't see that happening either NW. Isn't it ran by the labour run Birmingham City Council? Surely a quick word in their ear from a neighbouring labour run city council would put an end to that?

Grendel · Sep 18, 2016

Liquid Gold said:
Does nobody get the impression that London Wasps want the legals dropped because they fear something? If not why would they give a shit.

They couldn't give a shit - it's a PR statement that automatically resonates with the masses.

Ian1779 · Sep 18, 2016

peeler said:
I'm sure Wasps would end up giving them the same deal as they currently have on a year by year basis.
What Wasps won't do is negotiate a 20-25 year deal, with greater access to match day revenues while there is 'background legal noise' .

Why would Wasps give CCFC something that they got for basically fuck all. The legal noise is an excuse to not negotiate.

Anyone that thinks Wasps are going to give us revenue access need to lay off the glue sniffing.

skybluetony176 · Sep 18, 2016

Grendel said:
Oh dear you seem a tad confused old boy. That's a CET article and it's generally relating to a quote from some chap from wasps.

We can go one by one through the many wasps "interpretation" of events and future happenings if you want - shall we?

Or better still why don't you e mail the fellow and ask him the proposed 20 year deal and the outlines of the deal. In particular ask him what the rent would be in say year 3 of said arrangement?

Can you then post that on here?

Out of interest where are you getting that the club only wanted another 2 + 2 year deal story from?

chiefdave · Sep 18, 2016

Broken Hearted Sky Blue said:
Told you yesterday nobody picked up on it

Wonder if that's where it has actually been picked up from or if there are others who have inside information, if it turns out to be true of course.

Sky Blue Kid said:
I said TM liked CA but he wasn't getting backing from SISU

Do you think that TM is lying when he says the budget is not noticeably different to last year and that he couldn't complete deals with his targets as they went to championship clubs?

SkyBlue_Bear83 said:
I'm not trying to scaremonger but I reckon this means more shit to follow.

That was my thought. Although he could just have realised its an impossible job and be fed up with constant abuse.

oucho · Sep 18, 2016

I had a pint with Anderson last year, not long after his appointment. I asked him how, as someone with no experience in running an organisation (he is an acaedmic) he was going to be able to run a club like CCFC. He didn't seemed frazed by the challenge. But now, on the basis of the Ops Director job vacancy that's being advertised, it would seem that the club have realised that they do indeed need someone with experience to run the club on a day to day basis; being a nice guy and nice guy and a stats geek isn't enough - just like on the pitch, we need and experienced leader to run the show.

peeler · Sep 18, 2016

Grendel said:
Oh dear you seem a tad confused old boy. That's a CET article and it's generally relating to a quote from some chap from wasps.

We can go one by one through the many wasps "interpretation" of events and future happenings if you want - shall we?

Or better still why don't you e mail the fellow and ask him the proposed 20 year deal and the outlines of the deal. In particular ask him what the rent would be in say year 3 of said arrangement?

Can you then post that on here?

You know exactly what is out there in the public domain. So I'm not going to give you anymore time.
Oh btw I'm ten times more likely to believe a quote from Wasps than I am from SISU or any of the pro-SISU shite that you come out with.

Deleted member 5849 · Sep 18, 2016

skybluetony176 said:
Can't see that happening either NW. Isn't it ran by the labour run Birmingham City Council? Surely a quick word in their ear from a neighbouring labour run city council would put an end to that?

The point being... there are lots of options, that aren't always the 'obvious'. How about Welford Road? Or maybe MMM could come to a deal to temporarily expand Webb Ellis Road? Maybe we could expand the difference slightly and sub Sixfields for SIxways?

If the will were there for our owners to move, they would. We've seen that, haven't we.

Gaz71 · Sep 18, 2016

Deleted member 5849 said:
Only Walsall actively distanced themselves.

There are also options such as here:

I'd prefer to hope we don't get to test it, rather than confidently assuming it won't happen again...

At least it's got a grassy hill

Deleted member 5849 · Sep 18, 2016

peeler said:
I'm ten times more likely to believe a quote from Wasps than I am from SISU

As long as that's 10 times zero then you're not mad.

Otherwise...

chiefdave · Sep 18, 2016

peeler said:
Oh btw I'm ten times more likely to believe a quote from Wasps

Like the one about them moving back to London?

Grendel · Sep 18, 2016

peeler said:
You know exactly what is out there in the public domain. So I'm not going to give you anymore time.
Oh btw I'm ten times more likely to believe a quote from Wasps than I am from SISU or any of the pro-SISU shite that you come out with.

Given that every time Nick Eastwood clicks his fingers - you spread your legs - that is hardly a surprise.

skybluetony176 · Sep 18, 2016

Deleted member 5849 said:
The point being... there are lots of options, that aren't always the 'obvious'. How about Welford Road? Or maybe MMM could come to a deal to temporarily expand Webb Ellis Road? Maybe we could expand the difference slightly and sub Sixfields for SIxways?

If the will were there for our owners to move, they would. We've seen that, haven't we.

I think there is will if it's an easy option. Something as simple as going to B instead of A. When we get into having to do something time consuming and requiring investment, such as paying and erecting temporary stands, catering facilities and toilet facilities I can't see them being interest. We've also seen that with shops, programs and tickets. It's not just money they don't want to invest. It's time also.

stupot07 · Sep 18, 2016

peeler said:
I'm sure Wasps would end up giving them the same deal as they currently have on a year by year basis.
What Wasps won't do is negotiate a 20-25 year deal, with greater access to match day revenues while there is 'background legal noise' .

Wasps won't give us greater access to revenues anyway. Whatever they give with one hand will be taken away with the other in any new deal.

Wasps will want to tie us down as long as possible because it will help with gaining a stadium sponsor, short term deals are no good for them. In fact Steve B from the trust posted on here they wasps wanted a long term deal and we only wanted another 2+2, and suggested that was the reason talks broke down.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

italiahorse · Sep 18, 2016

Grendel said:
Well that's bollocks because CCFC wanted a 2 year extension and were told to piss off

They got it

Grendel · Sep 18, 2016

italiahorse said:
They got it

After this agreement ends.

italiahorse · Sep 18, 2016

Grendel said:
Well they've got a year to figure it out and as long as that 35 mile restriction is lifted im sure options are available.

There won't be as many travelling next time.

stupot07 · Sep 18, 2016

skybluetony176 said:
Out of interest where are you getting that the club only wanted another 2 + 2 year deal story from?

Steve B from the trust posted it on here.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Deleted member 5849 · Sep 18, 2016

italiahorse said:
There won't be as many travelling next time.

They'll just need to find a place that embraces the possibility of league football, get the locals to turn up in droves with the offer of free tickets and flags.

Grendel · Sep 18, 2016

skybluetony176 said:
Out of interest where are you getting that the club only wanted another 2 + 2 year deal story from?

I heard from a source but then someone else said it on here....

italiahorse · Sep 18, 2016

Grendel said:
Show me evidence that says the 20 - 25 year deal was what was being negotiated.

The club wanted a 2+2 extension as I understand and that's the reason talks fell down.

The impasse was huge

This is tripe with bells on.
CA words say differently.

italiahorse · Sep 18, 2016

Grendel said:
I heard from a source but then someone else said it on here....

As I said .... Tripe

sw88 · Sep 18, 2016

No loss. We've clearly gone backwards in many ways under his leadership.

Perhaps he should write a new book about our stats under him!

Games played
Players signed
Players sold
Pieces of land bid for
Number of ignored tweets!

Grendel · Sep 18, 2016

stupot07 said:
Steve B from the trust posted it on here.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Indeed and I'd already been told the proposal and the clubs stance from a source and that source said 2 and 2 was the clubs stance.

stupot07 · Sep 18, 2016

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Moff · Sep 18, 2016

letsallsingtogether said:
I heard this the other day.
Will have to wait and see if it is
Didn't want to post it on here due to the usual abuse when you start a rumour post.

To be fair, most people tend to take on board the inside info you hear, as generally their is substance to it. I think its those that say a mate told them down the pub so it must be true that usually get the stick.

Moff · Sep 18, 2016

peeler said:
Good point, basically they have nowhere to go. Who in there right mind would work with them.

Someone else just motivated by money?

Skyblueweeman · Sep 18, 2016

Deleted member 5849 said:
Alexander Stadium.

It's an old pic though. I've got a client who are based in a new stand based on the right of the track.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Deleted member 5849 · Sep 18, 2016

Skyblueweeman said:
It's an old pic though. I've got a client who are based in a new stand based on the right of the track.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Indeed. Makes it even more suitable now there's a stand the opposite side, eh.

Grendel · Sep 18, 2016

italiahorse said:
This is tripe with bells on.
CA words say differently.

So the head of the Sky Blue Trust is a liar?

Lol. Keep digging.

italiahorse · Sep 18, 2016

Grendel said:
So the head of the Sky Blue Trust is a liar?

Lol. Keep digging.

The Sky Blue Trust are shit don't forget or have you changed your mind ?

ccfcway · Sep 18, 2016

and yet another thread decends into the same old......

Grendel · Sep 18, 2016

italiahorse said:
The Sky Blue Trust are shit don't forget or have you changed your mind ?

So do you think Steve was lying when he heard the same as my "tripe" Italia?

The interesting thing is you spout a lot of bullshit and pass it of as fact

When some suggestion that your beloved Wasps are implicated in being less than honest you literally start to shit yourself. Why?

Anyway here is a question - have you met Mr Eastwood, Mr Armstrong and the Finance Director (whose name I have forgotten) - have you engaged in conversation Italia?

Buster · Sep 18, 2016

Don't think you lot can see the wood for the trees. SISU arnt contemplating being here after the legal are over ( even though they are prepared to sit it out ) . To commit to a contract at the Ricoh would handicap an incoming buyer and limit the potential . No new ground just noise . No ground move cus of damage to brand image , which is all we have left. Joy is looking for a way out without hurting her reputation any more . Next twelve months will be interesting

Chris Anderson (1 Viewer)

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Deleted member 5849

Guest

Well-Known Member

Deleted member 5849

Guest

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Deleted member 5849

Guest

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Chief Commentator!

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Deleted member 5849

Guest

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Users who are viewing this thread

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency