i can't believe everyone prefers clarke to christie!
i though for the majority of last season christie was class!
quicker than clarke, a better tackler than clarke, better in the air than clarke, better on the attack than clarke, more two footed than clarke, less clumsy than clarke. Just an all round better player IMO
All of your comparisons are correct if you switch the names around. Clarke is the better full back by a country mile. Christie is perceived to be better as he makes runs forward and is quick, however this means positionally and defensively he isnt at a good level yet. Much the same argument as with Hussey, going forward good but going backwards poor.