shmmeee
Well-Known Member
Yes, perhaps instead of spending c£40m on funding losses of a mediocre squad over the last 7 years, they should have spent another £60-70m and took a proper punt, albeit probably failing. At least we could look back on the last 7 years and say "hey oh, we may be £100m+ in debt but at least we took a punt...."
Instead of spending £50m in 7 years and taking the club down, why not, say, £30m in 3 years and try and take the club up?
The end result will probably be the same if we didn't go up to when Sisu get bored here.