They didn't keep the rebate quiet, people knew about it it just wasn't reported.
I have no idea how much has left, neither do you.
Yes, I am saying they have paid it into the Escrow.
Now they just need to get the amount confirmed and then it can be released by whoever the Escrow is with.
It isn't being naive, it has been paid into the Escrow hasn't it? Just because I am not getting angry calling them wankers and saying "Just leave SISU".
Yes, I am saying they have paid it into the Escrow.
Now they just need to get the amount confirmed and then it can be released by whoever the Escrow is with.
It isn't being naive, it has been paid into the Escrow hasn't it? Just because I am not getting angry calling them wankers and saying "Just leave SISU".
Do you know that 300k was paid when they are trying to say it is 500k?
Does it make sense that they are trying to say that 500k was paid and they don't want to pay anything twice????? so they only put the 90k in to make it up to 590k?
Wasnt it enough to keep the fl.Happy?
You don't know how much, neither do I. I really don't care as long as the fl are happy with it
Wasnt it enough to keep the fl.Happy?
You don't know how much, neither do I. I really don't care as long as the fl are happy with it
I thought the FL meeting is on 6th June and they haven't commented yet?
That is not proof of payment, how naive are you?
I thought the FL meeting is on 6th June and they haven't commented yet?
Do you know that 300k was paid when they are trying to say it is 500k?
Does it make sense that they are trying to say that 500k was paid and they don't want to pay anything twice????? so they only put the 90k in to make it up to 590k?
Who paid it into the escrow Otium or Appleton ?
How much was it then, Astute? You seem fairly confident.
For Nick..
It wasn't the full amount. We know this. Otherwise they would have said. So as usual we are left to work out the truth for ourselves.
Why do they say that 500k was paid by others when it was only 300k? My guess would be 90k to go with the 500k that they make out that was paid by others.
Would you like to take a guess and reason for that guess?
No idea, have you?
How much was it then, Astute? You seem fairly confident.
I wonder if Higgs or the council owed £590,000 to the club and it was discovered the club then had secured £300,000 from PWKH and Lucas what the reaction would be?
We know how much it was. However much they have collected from the <400 season ticket buyers....
Because the 500k was negotiated down to 300k, which means the guaranteed amount is paid, that being 500k, its just their spin, no matter which way you look at it the 500k is paid.Why do they say that 500k was paid by others when it was only 300k? My guess would be 90k to go with the 500k that they make out that was paid by others.
Because the 500k was negotiated down to 300k, which means the guaranteed amount is paid, that being 500k, its just their spin, no matter which way you look at it the 500k is paid.
For the figures it is 500k that dosnt have to be paid! It was cleared even tho it was only 300 paid.How could 500k have been paid when only 300k was paid? :thinking about:
For the figures it is 500k that dosnt have to be paid! It was cleared even tho it was only 300 paid.
Get the debt recovery companies after you, you owe 500, but cant afford that and you offer a 300 lump sum, they accept it. Your 500 debt is cleared even tho you only paid 300.
How could 500k have been paid when only 300k was paid? :thinking about:
OMG. It is SISU looking for a reason not to pay 590k. That 300k was for non payment of rent. The 590k was for more reasons.
OMG. It is SISU looking for a reason not to pay 590k. That 300k was for non payment of rent. The 590k was for more reasons.
OMG, wouldn't want ACL to lose out on any money would we?
OMG, wouldn't want ACL to lose out on any money would we?
Astute seems to know the reason the Football League arrived at the figure and it is separate from the £300,000
More like I don't want our club to have another season fucked up by SISU playing silly buggers and not paying their debts and taking the piss again. So what is wrong with having the 590k in that account and get a rebate if the FL agrees with them instead of risking more sanctions from the FL?
I suppose you can always blame someone else if it comes to that.
The football league didnt come up with the figure. Paul Appleton came up with the figure during his dealing of the administration. The only thing the league stated was that for CCFC to continue trading once the CVA was rejected then it would need to honour the amount offered by Appleton after the liquidation process. Since the figure is a dividend it makes no odds what amount they have been paid from elsewhere.Astute seems to know the reason the Football League arrived at the figure and it is separate from the £300,000
nothing wrong with david Icke really he just had an aversion to crosses when he played for us. If its in an Escrow then the FL will be satisfiedSeems like they've played by the book in this instance, according to FL instruction.
However the validity of FL instructions holds as much weight as David Icke and his relationship to the big man in the sky...
WM
By your comment you seem to know that it was only about the rent. The 300k was only about the rent. The 590k must now not be anything to do with the cancellation of the rental contract and a couple of other things now :facepalm:
Just like we are only playing in Northampton because of the rent.....sorry pie money.....sorry rent again.......sorry freehold.......sorry unencumbered freehold.
The original agreement saw the pair agree to guarantee a combined £500,000 if the club failed to fulfil its financial obligations to ACL.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?