What type of test was it?I got my test result 6 hours after taking it, then got my vaccine the following day, results come Back pretty fast now, but also I'm not a NHS employee so. Maybe thats why I got a fast test.
Residual infection rate is so high though that the rate of growth can be lower yet still show far more daily cases?Can anyone Square the circle around the r rate .
Which was estimated at 2.5 3 last April?
My employer has given me a key worker letter. As we provide back office services to the NHS they class the entire org as key workers.FFS
Primary schools in England still 'rammed' with pupils, say heads
Warnings that schools may have to stay closed for longer, as more parents claim key worker statuswww.theguardian.com
Shit !! Hope he's on the mend soon evo.My best mate has just called an ambulance as he's taken a turn for the worse with covid... This is the 8th day for him so far... He was ok felt a bit groggy but his breathing has gone to pot today
I got my test result 6 hours after taking it, then got my vaccine the following day, results come Back pretty fast now, but also I'm not a NHS employee so. Maybe thats why I got a fast test.
How much for a vaccine?
2x for £4 or 3x for a Pfizer.
Sent from my I3113 using Tapatalk
Thought there was a reference to 75 k recently.68k new cases, is that record?
Work for NHS, so top, but 0 health issues.Which priority group are you?
IdkWhat type of test was it?
Work for NHS, so top, but 0 health issues.
Typo, my bad will go back and correct it.You just said you didn't work for it?
No idea what I was trying to put but corrected itYou just said you didn't work for it?
81k by specimen date on 29th DecemberThought there was a reference to 75 k recently.
Might have been around a miscount or adjustment though .
Ricoh has been busy today apparently.
That's a PCR test, maybe they can analyse them in the UHCW path labIdk, I was told I needed to get tested before i had my vaccine, shoved it down my throat and up my nose, got my results then got my vaccine.
It isn't vague. It is very simple.All H&S is vague as fuck innit? They’d have to prove they’ve taken all reasonable precautions I’d guess. I’ll be honest without a union legal team behind me I wouldn’t try it, but that doesn’t mean it’s not right.
There is no need for it at all. It puts pressure on us that we could do without. Anyone who is or lives with anyone who is classed as at risk have been told to stay at home and not come to work. The same for anyone who has any sort of symptoms. They have to stay away for 14 days. But we still have the capacity to produce enough for everyone and also have a safety stock.I don't know what it is about bog roll that makes it such a prime candidate for panic buying.
Production must have been 'ramped up' to make millions of bottles that wouldn't normally have been made.Surely it was known vials would be needed regardless?
Why wasn't production of them ramped up?
It isn't vague. It is very simple.
So to put it into simple terms....it is cost against amount of protection given. Anything dangerous in any way isn't allowed. Everything must be risk assessed. You wouldn't be expected to pay 100k to stop someone scratching their finger but if there is a slight risk of losing a finger it is a different matter. Then it comes down to availability of funds/finding a solution. A solution is using an SWP..safe working practice.
So you don't understand what dangerous means?That sounds pretty vague.
To get down to 1k a day would be an achievementWas thinking a while back I wonder when the uk will have its first day of no recorded cases, not going to be 2021 is it....
Unless it's properly enforced, what's the point? When the 'stay at home' lockdown was done here earlier this year if you went outside without reason you'd be fined.A lot of people are just out and going about there business if they are going to lockdown they should do it properly. On my walk I walk through a trading estate that has a personal training unit on it and for the last three days I have Either seen people hanging around by the back door or leaving the area looking sweaty.
Probably 2023.Was thinking a while back I wonder when the uk will have its first day of no recorded cases, not going to be 2021 is it....
So you don't understand what dangerous means?
If every time you crossed the road there was a good chance of getting hit by a car something drastic would have to change. That is dangerous. But you don't frequently get hit by a car but there is still a chance of it happening. So the choices are make drastic changes, use different methods like pedestrian crossings or accept the risk.
And this is where the cost comes into it. You wouldn't put pedestrian crossings on every road. You put them where they are needed the most. But it doesn't eliminate all risk.
Surely it will be never?Was thinking a while back I wonder when the uk will have its first day of no recorded cases, not going to be 2021 is it....
Would you expect a small company to pay 100k to take away a risk? Would you expect a worldwide company that makes billions a year to spend 100k to take away the same risk?Understanding a term and quantifying it are two different things. Dangerous is a relative subjective term. As is “drastic” “costly” “good chance”.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?