I think you are right on the timing but you know I just don’t trust the government not to totally drop the bollock on this. Just look at the narrative in the papers and on the TV in the last few days... it’s there for a reason. A plan has to include a vaccination schedule, staggered return and a guarantee that safety will be paramount. Otherwise we’ll be discussing this again in Lockdown 5 at the end of the year, after killing a lot more people because they didn’t get this last bit right.
Only 20000 infections though so numbers coming down rapidly which is good
Reminded that Chris Whitty said we’d have done well if we reach 20000 deaths so five times as many, is that terrible or criminal or just bad luck?
It was Whitty and why?neither and I thought it was Ferguson not Whitty
neither and I thought it was Ferguson not Whitty
It’s got to be hasn’t it?Deaths caused by criminal negligence
Brown is very popular in Scotland
It’s got to be hasn’t it?
So what spread bollocks about it not being effective?Marketing what? They're going to use it with millions of their own people
It was Whitty and why?
I mean, let's be honest, none of it is going to be classed and criminal.
Question asked now about 20000.
Appallih tragic loss of life - need to work together
no answer or responsibility taken at all
It won’t be Hill, I know that, it doesn’t mean that it isn’t
In a normal country this is totally correct. But here, there is no one to ask the questions. The opposition won’t even do it for fucks sake.I will be amazed if Parliament lasts for the full term after this pandemic is over. Tough questions will need to be asked all around.
Sorry it was Patrick VallanceWell
UK coronavirus deaths could reach 7,000 to 20,000: Ferguson
UK deaths from the coronavirus could rise to between about 7,000 and 20,000 under measures taken to slow the spread of the virus, Neil Ferguson, a professor at Imperial College in London who has helped shape the government's response, said on Sunday.www.google.co.uk
well it isn’t or every leader in Europe will be in the Hague - it will be a big courtroom
It won’t be Hill, I know that, it doesn’t mean that it isn’t
In a normal country this is totally correct. But here, there is no one to ask the questions. The opposition won’t even do it for fucks sake.
Not for me.
Agree to disagree then.
No one said it wasn’t effective.So what spread bollocks about it not being effective?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?