We may be at cross purposes .Wingy, I don't think this is correct. By region, China's mortality rates range from 1.4% to 3.6% overall. What's interesting to me is the 0.2% mortality rate in Germany, as they are also a country that has undertaken a large amount of testing for the virus, and which increases the denominator when calculating mortality rates. The UK Gov't own estimate is a 1% mortality rate, which is close to that for Swine flu. Italy's mortality rate is currently 2%. As has been recognised, just as important, if not more, is the % infected.
Appreciate that, but I was pointing out that the constant abuse he/the government gets on here isn’t necessarily reflective of the wider population.
I’ve got a mix of mates (with various political persuasions) and haven’t heard many moans, not because I think anyone thinks the governments approach has been perfect, but because they understand these are unprecedented times
Believe there is a list available but also been told by someone who is on that list that her family doesn’t count as only her job is on the list so unless both parents are on the list or you’re a single parent your children can’t go into school still.So he hasn’t said who counts as protected workers. Thanks mate
Any chance on a graph to back this up mate ?Guys. You didn’t have coronavirus last year. If you did we’d currently be in the middle of a mass outbreak as opposed to the start. One person restarted the outbreak in Korea, similarly our good tracking suppressed the first outbreak here. You weren’t running around Cov with coronavirus believe me, it genuinely was man flu.
The first 100 is the same as the next 400. And so on. It flattens out even when the cases go up by hundreds a day. They then use this to say how ours is shooting up yet the others are not. But that is not the reality.
Thank you. Always good to have someone that understands how to read a graph and what a log scale is!You can mention what you want. Half of this thread is people arguing about the graph so pretty sure it can be mentioned!
Yes, that's how a log scale works. It will flatten out while cases are going up by hundreds a day further up the curve BUT if the increase continues to be exponential it will continue to be a straight line. If the curve begins to flatten you might still have hundreds of cases per day but if you're further up the scale those hundreds might be a small percentage and so it will mean the growth rate is slowing. No matter how high up the scale you are eventually you the gradient will get shallower and level off to a horizontal line once there are no new cases/deaths.
Wingy, I don't think this is correct. By region, China's mortality rates range from 1.4% to 3.6% overall. What's interesting to me is the 0.2% mortality rate in Germany, as they are also a country that has undertaken a large amount of testing for the virus, and which increases the denominator when calculating mortality rates. The UK Gov't own estimate is a 1% mortality rate, which is close to that for Swine flu. Italy's mortality rate is currently 2%. As has been recognised, just as important, if not more, is the % infected.
Nah it's all about graphs now."I don't think this is correct" then supplying a reasonable explanation? That's not how it works here, son. You're supposed to reply with dripping condescension and then spend your time telling people the other person is an idiot and sneering at every post they make.
Thank you. Always good to have someone that understands how to read a graph and what a log scale is!
I shall now remove myself from tethers end
Nah it's all about graphs now.[/QUOT
Good God
Me too.I'm going for tea, not waiting to see this hand grenade go off.
Are you not supposed to stay indoors for 14 days?Feeling a bit better at the moment. Still got a cough but it’s not a dry cough now. Went for a walk round the block with my lad on his scooter. Knackered me out but I feel like it did me good. Didn’t see a single car driving about.
Almost had thoughts of having a beer a minute ago but I won’t.
Are you not supposed to stay indoors for 14 days?
We don't test the vast majority so will never know how bad it is.How come only 66 more cases please?
We were told they were testing 7500 todayWe don't test the vast majority so will never know how bad it is.
? It's gone up by about 600 since yesterdayHow come only 66 more cases please?
If you're believing this stuff Pete maybe someone else should do the meetings with Joy and Duggins (insert some kind of banterish emoji).We were told they were testing 7500 today
8360 tests since yesterday's figure, results are usually a couple of days behind, so those will likely be part of Saturdays figuresWe were told they were testing 7500 today
Feeling a bit better at the moment. Still got a cough but it’s not a dry cough now. Went for a walk round the block with my lad on his scooter. Knackered me out but I feel like it did me good. Didn’t see a single car driving about.
Almost had thoughts of having a beer a minute ago but I won’t.
Sorry was looking at incorrect data thanks? It's gone up by about 600 since yesterday
Yesterday 2,626
Today 3,269
Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
8360 tests since yesterday's figure, results are usually a couple of days behind, so those will likely be part of Saturdays figures
Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
It’s a throat swab mate not a rectal examination.I must remember to sort out my dangleberries if I am going for a corona test
It’s a throat swab mate not a rectal examination.
It all depends on what cases are recorded, which depends on which people are tested. UK are only testing people admitted to hospital which, by definition will be the patients who are most ill. The most ill are more likely to die. People who are less ill stay at home are not being tested. The mortality rate for the UK based on reported cases will be artificially high than is the actual case for all those infected.Yep, hence based on recorded cases.
Shame, I could have killed two birds with one stone.It’s a throat swab mate not a rectal examination.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?