Coronavirus Thread (Off Topic, Politics) (4 Viewers)

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Are you being serious?

It shows Johnson has acknowledged Cummings and his nonsense is well in the past

Will be well received by the majority in the country and boost the government poll ratings - him vs that oily weirdo shadow health bloke? No contest

Well yes he left because of Cummings’ interference so presumably he has had assurances he will have a freer hand.

One question for you G, how do you think it will go down with the half of the Tory membership that has a problem with brown leaders?
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Well yes he left because of Cummings’ interference so presumably he has had assurances he will have a freer hand.

One question for you G, how do you think it will go down with the half of the Tory membership that has a problem with brown leaders?

Who cares Tory members would fill a phone booth
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
Fuck off with the conspiracy theory absolute bullshit - I‘m not & never have been you moron - pathetic,just because I don’t want to live in fear like you
Lazy response
You haven't got a clue. The NHS was overwhelmed:

It had to create thousands of extra ICU beds
It had to redraft other clinical specialities to look after critically ill patients,
It had consultants doing nursing shifts
It's now got a significant backlog of people waiting for treatment
Thousands of people with undiagnosed cancer

Comparing today with a catastrophic situation doesn't mean today is any good.

I tend to agree that it is time to go back to normal but it's only a few weeks to get second jabs to a chunk of the population. It's not as if the current restrictions are any thing that can't be lived with for a bit longer, let's be honest.

I take it that you, like saddlebags has had both of your jabs
 

COV

Well-Known Member
You haven't got a clue. The NHS was overwhelmed:

It had to create thousands of extra ICU beds
It had to redraft other clinical specialities to look after critically ill patients,
It had consultants doing nursing shifts
It's now got a significant backlog of people waiting for treatment
Thousands of people with undiagnosed cancer

Comparing today with a catastrophic situation doesn't mean today is any good.

I tend to agree that it is time to go back to normal but it's only a few weeks to get second jabs to a chunk of the population. It's not as if the current restrictions are any thing that can't be lived with for a bit longer, let's be honest.

I take it that you, like saddlebags has had both of your jabs

Doubt it, the jabs are only for people over 18
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
You haven't got a clue. The NHS was overwhelmed:

It had to create thousands of extra ICU beds
It had to redraft other clinical specialities to look after critically ill patients,
It had consultants doing nursing shifts
It's now got a significant backlog of people waiting for treatment
Thousands of people with undiagnosed cancer

Comparing today with a catastrophic situation doesn't mean today is any good.

I tend to agree that it is time to go back to normal but it's only a few weeks to get second jabs to a chunk of the population. It's not as if the current restrictions are any thing that can't be lived with for a bit longer, let's be honest.

I take it that you, like saddlebags has had both of your jabs

Can I mention the ‘W’ word at this point?
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
Are you being serious?

It shows Johnson has acknowledged Cummings and his nonsense is well in the past

Will be well received by the majority in the country and boost the government poll ratings - him vs that oily weirdo shadow health bloke? No contest

Poor leadership to let him become so influential and defend his Barnard Castle breach.
 

Saddlebrains

Well-Known Member
You haven't got a clue. The NHS was overwhelmed:

It had to create thousands of extra ICU beds
It had to redraft other clinical specialities to look after critically ill patients,
It had consultants doing nursing shifts
It's now got a significant backlog of people waiting for treatment
Thousands of people with undiagnosed cancer

Comparing today with a catastrophic situation doesn't mean today is any good.

I tend to agree that it is time to go back to normal but it's only a few weeks to get second jabs to a chunk of the population. It's not as if the current restrictions are any thing that can't be lived with for a bit longer, let's be honest.

I take it that you, like saddlebags has had both of your jabs


Saddlebrains. Hope this helps FernandoAlonso
 

baldy

Well-Known Member
You haven't got a clue. The NHS was overwhelmed:

It had to create thousands of extra ICU beds
It had to redraft other clinical specialities to look after critically ill patients,
It had consultants doing nursing shifts
It's now got a significant backlog of people waiting for treatment
Thousands of people with undiagnosed cancer

Comparing today with a catastrophic situation doesn't mean today is any good.

I tend to agree that it is time to go back to normal but it's only a few weeks to get second jabs to a chunk of the population. It's not as if the current restrictions are any thing that can't be lived with for a bit longer, let's be honest.

I take it that you, like saddlebags has had both of your jabs

Yep I have…I work in a hospital so had both of mine months ago
 

Skybluefaz

Well-Known Member
Surely catching COVID off your child is a concern?
Personally, not really although I appreciate it will be for some. Cos someone tested positive in my sons year on Friday he's already missed out on his final football tournament of the season, he'll miss out on swimming with school every day this week which was already rearranged. He's back to online learning which means I've got to manage that and my own work this week. Plus he'll miss two further football training sessions and shouldn't really leave the house. He's tested negative on a lateral flow yesterday. It feels like there should be a better way to manage it. Maybe some of that 37 billion quid could have stretched to a more effective way to manage Covid-19 in schools rather than sending everyone home.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Personally, not really although I appreciate it will be for some. Cos someone tested positive in my sons year on Friday he's already missed out on his final football tournament of the season, he'll miss out on swimming with school every day this week which was already rearranged. He's back to online learning which means I've got to manage that and my own work this week. Plus he'll miss two further football training sessions and shouldn't really leave the house. He's tested negative on a lateral flow yesterday. It feels like there should be a better way to manage it. Maybe some of that 37 billion quid could have stretched to a more effective way to manage Covid-19 in schools rather than sending everyone home.

Well being honest if we are to ‘live with Covid’ we should be letting schools function as normal and treating someone off with it the same we do as any other illness. What we’re doing right now isn’t really teaching
 

Nick

Administrator
The provision is always there in cases where both parents cannot WFH.

Other members of the workforce aren’t your enemy

I'm not saying they are.

Just when I am having to take days off to help teach my child I don't have the privilege of somebody doing my job for me.

It's just not as simple as "close all the schools". We need to learn to live with it rather than lock the country down every time.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
I'm not saying they are.

Just when I am having to take days off to help teach my child I don't have the privilege of somebody doing my job for me.

It's just not as simple as "close all the schools". We need to learn to live with it rather than lock the country down every time.

Primary schools can and should stay open, they aren’t the main drivers of infection and the children are less able to handle remote learning.

Teaching remotely is harder and a bigger ball ache so it’s not like I’m suggesting it lightly. My wider point is we should be fully unrestricting schools so none of it is needed and we don’t have half in half out
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
This may be a stupid question as I don't have kids but what do you do in the school holidays or when your kids are off school sick?

plan I assume as you know it’s happening - reality is we can’t just keep closing schools at unscheduled times
 

Nick

Administrator
This may be a stupid question as I don't have kids but what do you do in the school holidays or when your kids are off school sick?

Use holiday or grandparents who also use holiday to spend time with her. Doesn't leave much left for all the other times.

She has had about 3 days off sick in about 7 years of being at school so sickness isn't an issue.

Everything is planned and worked around for holidays.
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
I'm not saying they are.

Just when I am having to take days off to help teach my child I don't have the privilege of somebody doing my job for me.

It's just not as simple as "close all the schools". We need to learn to live with it rather than lock the country down every time.

Who pays your wages if you're ill with covid?
It's catch 22
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Who pays your wages if you're ill with covid?
It's catch 22

It isn’t really - it’s the same who pays if you’ve got flu and can’t go in - that’s not an argument - you don’t close businesses if someone in has Covid
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Fair play, pretty impressive that you manage to plan when your kids are going to be sick :sick:

Thats an emergency scenario though isn’t it - it’s not the case of being sick is it it’s closing schools so every child who is perfectly well can’t go into school which is absurd
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Thats an emergency scenario though isn’t it - it’s not the case of being sick is it it’s closing schools so every child who is perfectly well can’t go into school which is absurd

At the moment large numbers who are perfectly well can’t go in because of one case in their year group. What I’m saying is if we are really concerned about that system then scrap it so children do not have to isolate or distance or close them altogether for the last few weeks so infections can fall.

Pretty much every teacher I work with wants to either have full normality or to go remote until the end.
 

Nick

Administrator
At the moment large numbers who are perfectly well can’t go in because of one case in their year group. What I’m saying is if we are really concerned about that system then scrap it so children do not have to isolate or distance or close them altogether for the last few weeks so infections can fall.

Pretty much every teacher I work with wants to either have full normality or to go remote until the end.

I agree. It's way over the top.

No point closing now, then we close again in Sept / Oct. Rinse and repeat.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top