www.reuters.com
Complete bollocks. His opinion based on nothing that’s never been peer tested against a tsunami of evidence to the contrary from almost every virologist in the world that has been peer tested.
So you already know he’s a crank yet you still chose to believe him.
The guy who won the Nobel prize for his coding? Why would you believe him over those who are experts in the actual area in question?
You should discredit wherever you you read this from simply for the fact that claims he’s a director of Pfizer. He isn’t. If they can’t even get a basic like that correct why would you entertain believing it.
That’s the same Michael Levitt. One thing of note, he won the Nobel prize as part of a team. The others don’t share his view. If you’re using his prize to legitimise his in peer tested opinion then you have to apply the same logic to the others who won it with him, then the sensible thing to do would be to make a simple calculation of weight of numbers which tells you that the majority of his team think he’s wrong, therefore he’s wrong.
Like I said. The rest of the team that won that prize don’t share his opinion. Weight of numbers tell you he’s wrong.
Pharma science is science. The clue is in the title.
The guy has nothing of substance. All he has is a misunderstood opinion that falls down with a minuscule amount of questioning. He’s absolutely a crank and you really don’t have to look into his opinions very hard to understand that.
And then the Nobel committee will become part of the woke elite or something and previously strongly held beliefs about the opinions of one Nobel winner will be dropped in favour of something else.
Made that point. The rest of the team that won it with him also don’t share his opinion having listened to peer proven evidence.
Do you apply this to everything or just covid vaccines?
I’ll take that as a no then. So basically 3 discredited scientists that fly in the face of convention with unverified, un peer tested opinions not based on actual facts trump hundreds if not thousands of scientists, many of who are actual experts in the relevant fields, many of whom will have Noble prizes for their work.
That is a huge stretch any way you look at it. The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation donated $53,501 to factcheck.org. RWJF holds stock in J&J.
You've seen it all before because everybody is sick of your shit.
This isn't some moral victory mate. You're endangering other people because of some bullshit you've read online you're not qualified to understand.
With respect I’ll take the advice of my daughters consultant with 40 years of medical experience thanks.
