D
Proof of Covid Vaccination needed for NEC
It is NEC policy for anyone attending an event, unless they are exempt, to show proof of covid vaccination before entry.
The card you received when you were vaccinated will be accepted as proof.
More effort than going for a vaccine, mind you!How many people still have those cards?
How easy are they to fake? (very)
Its a mess. The government guidelines for events are that vaccine passports should be checked as a requirement of entry and that masks should be worn but as they've removed any legal requirement it's now down to individual events & venues. So its not being applied by everyone as we know.Yet how many people go to one football match at Elland Road every other week?
gov.uk said:We expect and recommend that members of the public continue to wear face coverings in crowded and enclosed spaces where you come into contact with people you don’t normally meet.
gov.uk said:The Government is urging nightclubs and other venues with large crowds to make use of the NHS COVID Pass, which shows proof of vaccination, a recent negative test or natural immunity as a means of entry.
This is a common complaint from music promoters. With no mandated system in place its left for each promoter to decide how they enforce the guidance. You can't insist on people using a secure vaccine passport app for example when the government don't make that a legal requirement.How many people still have those cards?
How easy are they to fake? (very)
I just saw this. He isn't a chemist, he's a biophysicist. Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, et al. you know, the people you listen to? They are are chemists.
I just saw this. He isn't a chemist, he's a biophysicist. Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, et al. you know, the people you listen to? They are are chemists.
Peer reviewed by who? Certainly not by the free thinkers. They've all been discredited, remember.
Boo fucking hoo you're calling troll. Can't have an opinion that goes against your sychophantic bleating?
There you go! See, you're making progress already.
Erm, okay.
No, he's not a virologist, you idiot. But he's now the closest thing we had to Professor Luc Montagnier. Have you heard of him? He was (yet another) discredited and defamed physicist. His crime was daring to talk about ADE on live TV. You know ADE don't you, you plum? That's when the body fails to use its natural immune system to halt a virus because another immune system has taken over.
But he has lost his credibility among the flock (that's you by the way). Just imagine his "peers" no longer hold him in esteem because he goes against narrative the pharmas are pushing. In this climate, anything peer reviewed is questionable.
You're the fucking dangerous one.
Ha ha. You're "funny"
If you’re serious then wow, just wow. “Free thinkers” what even is a free thinker?
People DO take the word of..... Just IMO other people (meaning you) are too gullible/lazy/sycophantic or just blind stupid to question anything that's said.
Maybe you are taking the word of virologists. So am I. The virologists that I listen to have been discredited (after leading their respective fields for decades) What we have left are the virologists who go with the same narrative as you do. That's all. And that's dangerous unless checked.
Are you happy with this?
The CDC say you’re not counted as fully vaccinated until a full 14 days have passed since your second injection in the case of Pfizer or Moderna, or 14 days after your first dose of Janssen, despite the fact that over 80% of deaths after the vaccines occur in this window.
How very convenient.
The fuck you on about?Are you happy with this?
The CDC say you’re not counted as fully vaccinated until a full 14 days have passed since your second injection in the case of Pfizer or Moderna, or 14 days after your first dose of Janssen, despite the fact that over 80% of deaths after the vaccines occur in this window.
How very convenient.
I'm a free thinker, the moon is made of cheese, prove me wrong sheeple!
Immediately, your first sentence is bullshit, and I think you know this. The rest is rhetoric related to the first sentence.
As straight forward as that hey? Nothing else you want to add? (ahem) cycle threshold?
If you’re serious then wow, just wow. “Free thinkers” what even is a free thinker?
Immediately, your first sentence is bullshit, and I think you know this. The rest is rhetoric related to the first sentence.
if i say so? it's how vaccines work. there is no other angle on thisJust looking out for my family and protecting them from people who
If YOU say so. You believe what you want. But as long as other people are aware of the other angle to this, and not simply following on blindly. I don't really have much else to enlighten YOU.
If I may say so, with a statement like that, you are a very good representation of someone who has zero idea of the Covid facts.
also a much bigger chance of giving it to othersSomeone who’s got a much bigger chance of dying from covid
He’s more free from thinking than free thinking.If you’re serious then wow, just wow. “Free thinkers” what even is a free thinker?
He’s more free from thinking than free thinking.
Just relaying facts
Two thirds of people who die in car crashes are wearing a seatbelt. That doesn’t mean seatbelts don’t work. Seatbelts are worn by over 90% of people in vehicles. Less than 10% account for a third of RTA deaths.Are you happy with this?
The CDC say you’re not counted as fully vaccinated until a full 14 days have passed since your second injection in the case of Pfizer or Moderna, or 14 days after your first dose of Janssen, despite the fact that over 80% of deaths after the vaccines occur in this window.
How very convenient.
I might regret this but...Are you happy with this?
The CDC say you’re not counted as fully vaccinated until a full 14 days have passed since your second injection in the case of Pfizer or Moderna, or 14 days after your first dose of Janssen, despite the fact that over 80% of deaths after the vaccines occur in this window.
How very convenient.
There you go again with your Brown Shirt talk. Like fucking sheep. Dangerous. Are you too thick to consider other opinions for yourself? smfh
That doesn’t need to be mutually exclusive. He’s both.i am liking his arguing that the basic premise on how vaccines work is a big pharma lie angle
he is either a wum or a weirdo
Woooosh!
it means that the CDC are manipulating the numbers to fit the narrative. Don't you see it?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?