Because our growth rate is only a bit slower than there’s. We’re on track for a thousand cases 2 days slower than they were and that’s before you account for numbers of tests.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I don’t know why people are arguing about whether he said 80% will get it or whether he thought 80% was a worst case at the end of the day it’s all a fucking guessing game - no one knows the final number and no one knows what the final mortality rate will be.Coronavirus may spread to 80% in UK and kill 1% of infected, but 'probably less'
It didn’t say very worse case scenario it said may be 80%
Partly cause it’s a huge amount of people that’s all but I totally agreeI don’t know why people are arguing about whether he said 80% will get it or whether he thought 80% was a worst case at the end of the day it’s all a fucking guessing game - no one knows the final number and no one knows what the final mortality rate will be.
He said it was his top level planning. You're doneCoronavirus may spread to 80% in UK and kill 1% of infected, but 'probably less'
It didn’t say very worse case scenario it said may be 80%
No we are not the first reported cases were not that far apart and Italy reported its first case 6 days before France - also the real rate on Italy is clearly higher chart the deaths to cases in the two countries and see what you conclude
So 1% of 48000000 is only 480000
so that’s ok SHIT
I don’t know why people are arguing about whether he said 80% will get it or whether he thought 80% was a worst case at the end of the day it’s all a fucking guessing game - no one knows the final number and no one knows what the final mortality rate will be.
You hear top level planning as the very very worse case scenario. I’m not sure that’s what he said but ok. What do you mean I’m done? It’s not a fuckin gameHe said it was his top level planning. You're done
Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
Top level planning is 80% he thinks it will be less and hopefully much less. Still significant numbers of people will die earlier than they would have.Don't be such a drama queen. Nobody has any idea how many are likely to be infected.
Top level planning is 80% he thinks it will be less and hopefully much less. Still significant numbers of people will die earlier than they would have.
Top level planning is 80% he thinks it will be less and hopefully much less. Still significant numbers of people will die earlier than they would have.
You're done in this argument. I.e. stop saying they said 80 percent of the uk will get the virus. It was never said. End ofYou hear top level planning as the very very worse case scenario. I’m not sure that’s what he said but ok. What do you mean I’m done? It’s not a fuckin game
Yes, commonly used to display exponential growth rates.
White Mental Hospital Room Interior 3d Stock Illustration 276804251
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That owner will increase the blood pressure of the under 70s fans wanting to see their team play. Plus he must have money to burn.Accrington owner seemingly threatening to not play their next few games:
EDIT: We play them in 16 days.
It’s the maths. I like stats but have my limits. Hence padded cell. Not a dig at you!?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It’s the maths. I like stats but have my limits. Hence padded cell. Not a dig at you!
Pretty much like that here normally, bit of a postcode lottery.Well when the country is having to literally choose who lives or dies based upon the resources available, maybe it won't be stupid. That is the reality here now.
The 14 days is an overestimate based on the fact some have extended to 11 days - 96% is in the 7 day bracket
I piss where I want and won't use the bar.
Well when the country is having to literally choose who lives or dies based upon the resources available, maybe it won't be stupid. That is the reality here now.
Yes but if you say it’s exaggerated and make a misguided comparison to the normal flu you might sound smart and reasonable.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yeah I'm scratching my head also over this because as you say, the rate in China is supposed to be falling. Yet 24m has been touted, presumably thats for the UK and not world wide?Look, China has a pop of 1.4 bn. How many cases (infected, not deaths) to date? 80,793, with the rate reported to be slowing. Sense of proportion required. Over 1k deaths each mth from seasonal flu.
There is a very good reason for that.Johnson looks out of his depth to me. Rabbit in the headlights springs to mind.
Course and I could have said may rather than willLook, China has a pop of 1.4 bn. How many cases (infected, not deaths) to date? 80,793, with the rate reported to be slowing. Sense of proportion required. Over 1k deaths each mth from seasonal flu.
I do that most games!And hold your breath for 90 minutes, so yes you'll be fine .
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?