Yes I do read properly.Do you ever read posts correctly?
I can't see past his phone hacking full stop but if I think he's right I'll say so.
Do you only agree with someone based on whether you like them?
Who are these 'better people' you're referring to?
You say the same as myself but have a go at my posts when I say the same.
Victim complex? Here we go again.I don’t recall having a go at you? Whatever I’m not here to feed your victim complex.
Yes I do read properly.
You can't see past his phone hacking full stop unless he says what you agree with.
Better people? Would take a lot to be worse. Or are you saying everyone is in praise of the Tories and nobody says anything bad about them?
Victim complex? Here we go again.
I suppose this isn't having a go. The line thrown about frequently.
How far back would you like me to go?
Not me on that one.Which I said at the time but most on here said he was doing the right thing. Now they say differently.
Saying that you can never see someone past a certain thing they have done in the past and then comparing them with someone who the only thing they have done wrong is come from a different political party is a good comparison.Are you mad?
What you suggesting is because I don't like the man I should disagree with him when I think he's right about something?
Same ad when I occasionally agree with a Tory minister. Are you saying I shouldn't because I don't like them or normally disagree with them? Fucking hell!
I agree. One of the rare ones on here who has been consistent.Not me on that one.
So. If Piers Morgan said 2 + 2 = 4 would you deliberately disagree with him and say it equals 5 just because you don’t like him?Saying that you can never see someone past a certain thing they have done in the past and then comparing them with someone who the only thing they have done wrong is come from a different political party is a good comparison.
If I can't get past something someone has done or said in the past I won't keep quoting them on anything.
Saying that you can never see someone past a certain thing they have done in the past and then comparing them with someone who the only thing they have done wrong is come from a different political party is a good comparison.
If I can't get past something someone has done or said in the past I won't keep quoting them on anything.
So. If Piers Morgan said 2 + 2 = 4 would you deliberately disagree with him and say it equals 5 just because you don’t like him?
Have I? I don't post on here much anymore. Mostly because of the double standards. When I look and catch up these days he gets constantly quoted.I don't keep quoting Piers Morgan.
Others do. When his detractors pipe up I just offer my opinion that on this matter I think he's right.
Youre done more to keep his name alive in this thread than anyone.
So when I say it equals 4 you disagree with me (even though you didn’t) but once Piers Morgan says it equals four it equals four. Double standards.I think we both know the answer to that!!
So what have his detractors said?
Do you ever read posts correctly?
I can't see past his phone hacking full stop but if I think he's right I'll say so.
Do you only agree with someone based on whether you like them?
Who are these 'better people' you're referring to?
I agree. One of the rare ones on here who has been consistent.
I can only guess you're responding to obtuse. I've put him on ignore now thank christ.
I have read it. Read lots of pages in one go when on catchup. He has been getting lots of praise the last couple of weeks.Read the thread.
Here we go with the Tory thing again.
I never have a good word for the Tories but it gets ignored. I say what is wrong with Labour and you would think I have said something badly wrong about someone's religion. Most on here either go into defence mode or go on the attack. Then in later posts they make out they agree with me but don't link it to a post of mine.
Work that one out.
I have read it. Read lots of pages in one go when on catchup. He has been getting lots of praise the last couple of weeks.
So what has been said against him?
I can only guess you're responding to obtuse. I've put him on ignore now thank christ.
If you think clapping the NHS every week is a bit over the top ...
Coronavirus: Pentagon planning flyovers of Blue Angels, Thunderbirds
Isn't as simple as that despite agreeing with something someone has done/said, you can still think they are a c**t for hacking a dead girls phone? Or am I missing something blatantYes I do read properly.
You can't see past his phone hacking full stop unless he says what you agree with.
Better people? Would take a lot to be worse. Or are you saying everyone is in praise of the Tories and nobody says anything bad about them?
Isn't as simple as that despite agreeing with something someone has done/said, you can still think they are a c**t for hacking a dead girls phone? Or am I missing something blatant
If you think clapping the NHS every week is a bit over the top ...
Coronavirus: Pentagon planning flyovers of Blue Angels, Thunderbirds
What is that cup doing to that plate!?
They’ve been chatting with Tobias Elwood then...If you think clapping the NHS every week is a bit over the top ...
Coronavirus: Pentagon planning flyovers of Blue Angels, Thunderbirds
Anyway normally, I'd just leave things but, is Matt Hancock auditioning for the comedy circuit?!?
It's one of the finest bits of trolling I've seen in recent times!If he is - it’s likely he’s unaware of it.
1 in 3 in hospital.People stay at home until really bad. Most suffer in silence or hardly show any symptoms if any.
Like Russell Slades City teamYou are very consistent to be fair
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?