Could have had Liverpool at Home (2 Viewers)

Como

Well-Known Member
Well 35 miles away.

That would have been interesting.....
 

@richh87

Member
I would have hated that. Some people would go to ShitFields to see it.

I'm delighted we haven't had a big team at home this year.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 

Como

Well-Known Member
Mainly for the amount of crap that would have posted on here.

On a more positive note it would have given many the ideal opportunity to protest against SISU in front of a large media audience.

How would tickets for the hill have been allocated, must be a lot of other issues.

Would banners have been allowed in like Arsenal?
 

letsallsingtogether

Well-Known Member
I have a season ticket on the hill so I would have been alright.:D and we allow any banners
Mainly for the amount of crap that would have posted on here.

On a more positive note it would have given many the ideal opportunity to protest against SISU in front of a large media audience.

How would tickets for the hill have been allocated, must be a lot of other issues.

Would banners have been allowed in like Arsenal?
 

ccfcway

Well-Known Member
Mainly for the amount of crap that would have posted on here.

On a more positive note it would have given many the ideal opportunity to protest against SISU in front of a large media audience.

How would tickets for the hill have been allocated, must be a lot of other issues.

Would banners have been allowed in like Arsenal?

lets say we got Liverpool at Home, that would still have meant only 6,000 cov fans tops, despite any "NOPM" chat.

Another reason why the move to Northampton is crazy, even if fans supported SISU and wanted to go on a weekly basis, they wouldn't be able to due to the size of the place
 

Como

Well-Known Member
NOPM would have been on the hill, presumably that would not count for the official attendance.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top