Does it not make you just a tiny bit curious as to how little money actually change hands in the deal?
(We don't even know if Wasps have paid cash for the shares. I would usually assume they did, but I won't be surprised if they got some sort of a payment plan).
Why isn't the loan paid out? Surely the council would have insisted the loan be paid out immediately? If not to avoid the coupling between loaning £14m to a hedge fund while not having money to avoid huge cuts on public service, then at least to avoid the risk of ACL going bankrupt in the future and have to write off the remaining part of the loan.
But cash flow aside - Bringing the club back adds value to the deal. What would the price be had the club stayed away?
I'm not saying it was right or wrong to sell to Wasps by the way. There are clearly many arguments for and against.
You must have an opinion, even journalists are allowed an opinion
See my response to Tony - cash flow might(!) have been a deal breaker.
But you said my post was inaccurate - I would have hoped you offered some facts, not opinions.
The Wasps thing won't last. Coventry has never been a rugger city and I don't think it will be long before crowds are down to around 7000 (excluding freebies). And there is little money to be made these days from conferences and concerts. I reckon Wasps will have major financial problems within the next 5 years. They won't be here for 250 years IMHO. Basically the Ricoh now has two sporting clubs that are both financially unviable. Their joint losses could probably be reduced thru a merger but I don't think the combined entity could run at a profit which means that a merger is unlikely.
I think our only chance of sporting success is to get some benefactor who is willing to burn money, like the owner of Leicester. No sane person would ever invest in a football club in order to turn a profit.
Isn't that how it works if people say you are wrong rather than they disagree?Ahhh. You want facts to counter you're opinion
There are a few that could have been called very pro-CCC/Higgs over the whole saga, such as Chiefdave, Duffer, James Smith, who(though always well argued) were very vociferous in their defence.
Since the whole Wasps saga has come about they've come to the realisation that all wasn't maybe as painted by the main protaganists and have looked at the whole thing more objectively, not as a "Sisu" or "ACL/Higgs/CCC" 100% black and white issue.
Fair play to them for that, shown that their views on franchising, supporting local clubs and communities etc are genuine and not just thrown out to make some sort of point.
Wonder why some can't look at things in the same manner.
Coventry and the surrounding area is definetely Rugby territory. Neil Back, Garforth, Duckham , Grewcock, Cockerill
Coventry and the surrounding area is definetely Rugby territory. Neil Back, Garforth, Duckham , Grewcock, Cockerill
I'm trying to find an accurate statement in your post. I suspect that I could be looking a long time.
Well, one obvious point is that if Wasps needed CCFC at the RA for their business plan to work then Wasps would have required the licence to be more than 2 plus 2.
Yes I'm sure they'll all be sat around laughing about how many teams they've managed to have a negative impact on.as to the advert, suspect Wasps will be smiling, less than one month after the first fixture and rivals are already having their noses put out of joint.
Maybe a Sting in the Tale yet! I can't believe Ann Lucas and CCC could ever lie, especially as most on here have continually defended them but blamed the owners for everything!
Personally I'm still laughing.
I don't know how anyone can read that Q&A at the end of the Observer article and not be fuming.
To me if CCC didn't have something to hide you'd see straight answers to simple questions.
As for claiming the match against Leinster will bring millions into the city what a joke. What evidence do they have to support that. Of course if one Wasps match brings in millions how much was lost to the city by us playing a season in Northampton? How much more will be lost if the unthinkable happens and we end up moving out of the city on a permanent basis.
And to top it all the money has come out of council funds, so essentially it is taxpayers money that has been used. Another case of, if we're being charitable, misleading statements from CCC. The less charitable may say it is another outright lie.
Surely they would know months in advance if Coldplay were going to play though?
.. or a skilled negotiator able to play a bad hand and win ?
My tuppence to this thread....Coldplay are fucking awful...
Oh how fashionable!
I think the words you were looking for Samo were 'factually correct'!
SISU rent boys all, paid off by their new PR firm.
I think the words you were looking for Samo were 'factually correct'!
Who told you they are awful weeman? The bloke off Buzzcocks?
I know a fella that thinks the Beatles are awful. Opinions are like arseholes...everybody has one.
My eardrums told me Samo. Like you alluded to, all about opinions.
Anyone who names their kid 'Apple' though....
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
As reinforced by Leicester feeling the need to pay money for their advertising hoarding!
Oh so its not about the music? Its about your'e opinions on naming children.
Maybe ACL should have taken a leaf out of SISU's books and not filed the accounts on time? So ACL have won a game of poker CCC/HIGGS - people foreget if they had not stepped in then the Ricoh would not have been built and we would of been homeless a lot sooner. oOr maybe pay a high rent on HR would have been OK? Unfornunately we will nevr know now.
At least AL has come out and fessed up. Have the other side done that? Did I miss it?
Maybe ACL should have taken a leaf out of SISU's books and not filed the accounts on time? So ACL have won a game of poker CCC/HIGGS - people foreget if they had not stepped in then the Ricoh would not have been built and we would of been homeless a lot sooner. oOr maybe pay a high rent on HR would have been OK? Unfornunately we will nevr know now.
At least AL has come out and fessed up. Have the other side done that? Did I miss it?
Jesus Samo...you're reading far too much into this...I think Coldplay are crap, that's all and was trying to add a little lightheartedness to the proceedings.
Chill out sweet-pea...
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Hey man, this a thread about council scumbags, you brought up coldplay! I just think its silly shit that's hip to say... Until those in the limelight choose the next whipping boys. Grow a mind of your own weeman.
I find them a bit bland myself, but then again my musical tastes are mostly trapped in the 80's like a prehistoric fly trapped in amber.
You do understand its an elected role don't you? She receives expenses not a salary
We did of course take up our option to buy back Highfield Road *after* the agreement was made to transfer responsibility for the Ricoh build to CCC.
I'm afraid to say there was.That's not strictly true though is it.... Saints had to provide a stadium with a minimum capacity to meet the Heineken Cup criteria. At no point was their ever serious dialogue about moving to MK
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?