Council and Sky Blues in court tomorrow (27 Viewers)

chiefdave · May 14, 2014

The tone of the judges summing up, well as far as you can tell from twitter, and a couple of his other comments seem to indicate he things SISU were wasting everyone's time. Can we read into anything the fact they wanted so many documents. Could that be an indication they don't have what they need and wanted to see as much as possible to try and find some evidence to support their claim. I would have thought if they knew of an issue they could take a more targeted approach and say we want that specific document.

wingy · May 14, 2014

covcity4life said:
wingy are you a ccfc fan or a council fan?

never seen you this happy when cov 3 up(although that might be because we will lose such a lead more often than not)

Like KOK I'm just trying to make light of something none of us want ,want this over ,and when that judge decides in a months time It should be .

i have my views and trust the Judge In the next event ,whatever they are I will base my final judgement aligned to those ,sorry for winding up but we're all guilty ,even you.

Kingokings204 · May 14, 2014

I would love to know the costs of these legal bills just out of interest and if sisu lose badly in JR then costs will be put to them for wasting ccc time I suspect. I wonder how their investors feel about their spending in the uk courtrooms.... May as well put 30k in the premium bonds.

Sick Boy · May 14, 2014

martcov said:
? Who's defending the Council at all costs? They seem to be doing that quite well themselves.

No other supporters in the Football League would be gunning for their own football club like some do on this forum.

Based on this forum, CCFC supporters currently have the kind of club they deserve.

wingy · May 14, 2014

chiefdave said:
The tone of the judges summing up, well as far as you can tell from twitter, and a couple of his other comments seem to indicate he things SISU were wasting everyone's time. Can we read into anything the fact they wanted so many documents. Could that be an indication they don't have what they need and wanted to see as much as possible to try and find some evidence to support their claim. I would have thought if they knew of an issue they could take a more targeted approach and say we want that specific document.

Maybe it isn't there ,maybe they know they can't win ,possibly always have .

TheRoyalScam · May 14, 2014

'Application to submit Miss Seppala's 110 page statement and 1,000 pages of illustrations dismissed by judge...'

I had to smile at this one 110 pages of fairy stories about big bad councillors preventing her getting possession of the Ricoh Castle, with some crayon drawings of ogres, dragons and princesses!

covcity4life · May 14, 2014

wingy said:
Like KOK I'm just trying to make light of something none of us want ,want this over ,and when that judge decides in a months time It should be .

i have my views and trust the Judge In the next event ,whatever they are I will base my final judgement aligned to those ,sorry for winding up but we're all guilty ,even you.

your not winding me up mate, i just asked in case you were one of those council zealots.

either side can win 10-0 as long as it gets ccfc home

Sick Boy · May 14, 2014

covcity4life said:
either side can win 10-0 as long as it gets ccfc home

It seems that this isn't really the main aim of most, it seems to me that they are more interested in the council.

Kingokings204 · May 14, 2014

Sick Boy said:
It seems that this isn't really the main aim of most, it seems to me that they are more interested in the council.

No I don't think this is the case I think fans want the truth and the right decision. The evidence seems to suggest that lies with ccc that's all SB. Not council fans. I believe if the council were mainly at fault and no doubt they have a little blame in this case but if it was clear to see then we all would be council haters for sure.

martcov · May 14, 2014

Sick Boy said:
No other supporters in the Football League would be gunning for their own football club like some do on this forum.

Based on this forum, CCFC supporters currently have the kind of club they deserve.

I think you are confusing the club, which we all support, with a Hedge fund - which currently own the club. I want a solution which is good for the club - which may or may not be good for the current owners. The Club comes first.

bigfatronssba · May 14, 2014

Why was todays case CCFC vs CCC when the Judicial Review will be Sisu vs CCC?

Grendel · May 14, 2014

martcov said:
I think you are confusing the club, which we all support, with a Hedge fund - which currently own the club. I want a solution which is good for the club - which may or may not be good for the current owners. The Club comes first.

And how does the stance of "don't let sisu get the Ricoh for cheap" help the club?

Terry Gibson's perm · May 14, 2014

TheRoyalScam said:
'Application to submit Miss Seppala's 110 page statement and 1,000 pages of illustrations dismissed by judge...'

I had to smile at this one 110 pages of fairy stories about big bad councillors preventing her getting possession of the Ricoh Castle, with some crayon drawings of ogres, dragons and princesses!

I look forward to reading this statement as to why she wants this arena as well as the one she plans to build in Narnia is she trying to build a collection of them?

stupot07 · May 14, 2014

So who won then?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors

covmark · May 14, 2014

Sick Boy said:
No other supporters in the Football League would be gunning for their own football club like some do on this forum.

Based on this forum, CCFC supporters currently have the kind of club they deserve.

Hate to say it, but I fully agree

Terry Gibson's perm · May 14, 2014

stupot07 said:
So who won then?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors

The lawyers as always.

olderskyblue · May 14, 2014

covmark said:
Hate to say it, but I fully agree

you agree that you have the club you deserve?

Grendel · May 14, 2014

covmark said:
Hate to say it, but I fully agree

Yep if the cost of getting rid of sisu is the end of the club most of the arseholes in here will be celebrating.

wince · May 14, 2014

Yep if the cost of getting rid of sisu is the end of the club most of the arseholes in here will be celebrating

the clubs finished in Northampton anyway

oldskyblue58 · May 14, 2014

Just a question but this case was brought by ARVO, SBS&L and CCFCH. CCFCH is now a shell dormant company to be wound up ........ how is it CCFC QC etc? The football club has not brought this action against CCC, neither CCFC nor Otium are listed as plaintiffs as far as I know

stupot07 · May 14, 2014

oldskyblue58 said:
Just a question but this case was brought by ARVO, SBS&L and CCFCH. CCFCH is now a shell dormant company to be wound up ........ how is it CCFC QC etc? The football club has not brought this action against CCC, neither CCFC nor Otium are listed as plaintiffs as far as I know

Perhaps that's just simon Gilbert saying it as it's easier to understand on twitter?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors

bigfatronssba · May 14, 2014

Grendel said:
Yep if the cost of getting rid of sisu is the end of the club most of the arseholes in here will be celebrating.

If sisu are to be believed Coventry will never have a professional football club again anyway.

Why would anyone support that?

Snozz_is_god · May 14, 2014

Sick Boy said:
No other supporters in the Football League would be gunning for their own football club like some do on this forum.

Based on this forum, CCFC supporters currently have the kind of club they deserve.

People aren't gunning for their football club at all, they're gunning for SISU. A lot believe like myself that the council winning the JR could see the end of SISU and a return of the club back to the Ricoh eventually.

Up the Council & SISU out

bigfatronssba · May 14, 2014

oldskyblue58 said:
Just a question but this case was brought by ARVO, SBS&L and CCFCH. CCFCH is now a shell dormant company to be wound up ........ how is it CCFC QC etc? The football club has not brought this action against CCC, neither CCFC nor Otium are listed as plaintiffs as far as I know

Also, could CCFC have legally passed these documents onto Sisu for the JR?

wingy · May 14, 2014

oldskyblue58 said:
Just a question but this case was brought by ARVO, SBS&L and CCFCH. CCFCH is now a shell dormant company to be wound up ........ how is it CCFC QC etc? The football club has not brought this action against CCC, neither CCFC nor Otium are listed as plaintiffs as far as I know

Anything to do with Costs awarded ??

Sick Boy · May 14, 2014

Snozz_is_god said:
A lot believe like myself that the council winning the JR could see the end of SISU and a return of the club back to the Ricoh eventually.

Up the Council & SISU out

Based on what?

'Up the Council' - about sums it up really, doesn't it?

skybluetony176 · May 14, 2014

torchomatic said:
Glad it wasn't accepted in that case. I think it's important the JR is heard asap.

Amen to that.

DaleM · May 14, 2014

Grendel said:
Yep if the cost of getting rid of sisu is the end of the club most of the arseholes in here will be celebrating.

No one at all would be celebrating if CCFC went . After your secret meeting with Labovich , do you think they will play their last spiteful card if the JR doesn't go their way and liquidate CCFC along with all their debts OR put it up for sale and try to at least get something back .

If say SISU get the Ricoh , which by the way I would like them to as long as there are covenants in place protecting CCFC, how much better do you think it would be for the club or how much would Sisu load it with debt to make a quick buck and fuck off into the sunset laughing their nads off ?

fernandopartridge · May 14, 2014

Sick Boy said:
Based on what?

'Up the Council' - about sums it up really, doesn't it?

Embarrassing.

The Gentleman · May 14, 2014

Grendel said:
And how does the stance of "don't let sisu get the Ricoh for cheap" help the club?

I know, but does the stance of "let them have the Ricoh for a very lowly (compared to previous) rent whilst they negotiate a new deal" help the club? certainly compared to playing at Sixfields. Remind me again who said no to this and therefore hinder the club?

lewys33 · May 14, 2014

People are missing the key point here.

If I wrote a 110 page statement that was "dismissed" I would be PISSED!!

covcity4life · May 14, 2014

if they go back on rent with a view to negotiating it will push back our hopes of ccfc owning a ground by years.

ccfc needs to move forward, we cant keep being bitches to rent

lewys33 · May 14, 2014

covcity4life said:
if they go back on rent with a view to negotiating it will push back our hopes of ccfc owning a ground by years.

ccfc needs to move forward, we cant keep being bitches to rent

I dont agree with that. You base the rent deal on negotiations happening within the year, if not proceed with the new stadium and rent at the Ricoh while that happens. Much better than Sixfields.

skybluetony176 · May 14, 2014

Sick Boy said:
No other supporters in the Football League would be gunning for their own football club like some do on this forum.

Based on this forum, CCFC supporters currently have the kind of club they deserve.

I think most people support the team not the regime. Or does that rule only count as a justification for attending suxfields?

covmark · May 14, 2014

fernandopartridge said:
Embarrassing.

It's worse than embarrassing.

Council and Sky Blues in court tomorrow (27 Viewers)

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Super Moderator

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Super Moderator

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

CCFC Finance Director

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

New Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Super Moderator

Well-Known Member

New Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Users who are viewing this thread

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency